Sponsored

A long post about long time issues with cam correlation codes. (Carnage pics)

HKusp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
2,875
Location
Hampton, Md.
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
As the title says, I have been fighting cam correlation and timing codes for almost the entire time I have had the built engine back in the car. I mentioned in another thread (that I kind of hijacked, sorry OP) that I was having this issue and noted what we thought had happened. It turns out that after many months of searching and trying to solve the issue, we may have finally stumbled upon it.

Some background: I broke a ring land a few years ago, and had a built shortblock done with stock new block, stock new crank, Manley 11:1 Pistons, and H-tuff rods, all ARP hardware everywhere, etc. We gapped it for boost. I had the original heads refreshed, with new Ford valves, and PAC springs. I re-used the Cams, but upgraded the cam cap hardware to ARP as well. A few friends, some professional mechanics and shop owners, and myself put the engine in.

After we got it up and running, I kept having issues with boost building in the crank case and blowing out the gasket between the oil pan and the block. I tried venting boost to atmosphere, and replaced the oil pan gasket, to no avail. I then bought PBH's metal Gen1/Gen2 oil pan conversion. Once I had that installed, it seemed to solve the pressure oil leak issue which was great! Then a few weeks later I started having random low oil pressure when running semi high RPM's under load. I called PBH and asked if there could be an issue and they said they have TONS of those pans out there and if there was an issue they would have heard about it. They said it COULD be something they haven't heard of but they doubted it. So I replaced oil pump gears, oil filter housing and sending unit 3 times. No luck. Kept having somewhat random low oil pressure at higher RPM's. I kept driving the car, and trying not to beat on it too hard while this was going on, though I probably shouldn't have.

I have had the front of the engine off and re-timed this car 4 times now and every time the cam correlation codes would come back. When I built the engine, I used FRPP phasers, chains, sprocket, tensioners and guides, so I was pretty sure it wasn't them. We eventually replaced every solenoid, checked continuity on the ENTIRE harness, started with a new cam sensor, replaced it with another new one, both from Ford, no aftermarket junk, still cam codes. Just bought all new FRPP phasers, chains, guides, and upgraded to Boss 302 tensioners. Had a new, stock oil pan put back oil to hopefully address the low oil pressure issue that I suspect was caused by the PBH pan. Put it all back together and cam correlation codes cam back, but no low oil pressure, so partial success.

Had a mobile tech from Ford look at the car and he said there has got to be a mechanical explanation for this and he suspected the cams themselves. He was right. He mentioned when he looked at the heads with the cam covers off without anyone saying anything to him about it, "This engine had an intermittent low oil pressure situation, didn't it?" Yes, yes it did... He said there are teflon rings under the cam caps at the very front where it bridges between the two cams. They were missing. It helps keep oil up in the top of the heads and oils the cams.

When the cams were in neutral, 3 valves were starting to open on the drivers side intake cam, and three on the passenger side exhaust cam. As you may or may not know, these cams are hollow and the lobes are pressed on. They CAN move. They're NOT supposed to, but they can if conditions like low oil pressure occur. (Go figure) So long story not short cams are trashed, heads are trashed, so I had to get a new (to me) set of heads and cams from a 2019 with about 50K miles on them. We are in the midst of the swap this week in the evenings. we are going to re-use the PAC springs and ARP hardware, but nothing else from the old heads. I will report back if this ends up being the solution. One thing for sure, is, the car needed cams and heads replaced.

Teflonringspic.jpg


Camspic001.webp


Camspic002.webp


Camspic003.jpg


Camspic004.webp


Camcappic.jpeg
Sponsored

 

Whitedevil95

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2019
Threads
55
Messages
1,057
Reaction score
882
Location
Temecula, CA
First Name
J.P.
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mach 1 HP
What what a crazy turn of events there. Hoping for the best after the swap!
 

robvas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2023
Threads
15
Messages
3,492
Reaction score
3,281
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
2011 GT
Where does the blame lie for the missing Teflon rings?
 

J17GT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Threads
9
Messages
838
Reaction score
739
Location
IL
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT PP
Damn…how many times did you want to set it all on fire? Glad it’s figured out as it’s no fun chasing issues and you can’t enjoy the car. We’ve all been there if you do this hobby long enough!
 

EFI

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 19, 2015
Threads
65
Messages
5,287
Reaction score
4,732
Location
Masshole central
Vehicle(s)
5.Br0
Sorry I can't be of any help here, but don't you just love it when you go all out and build an engine to the gills and it becomes even less reliable and more prone to issues than a stock one?

I personally have learned my lesson, hopefully you get something out of your experience and you get back to having a reliable engine.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
HKusp

HKusp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
2,875
Location
Hampton, Md.
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
Sorry I can't be of any help here, but don't you just love it when you go all out and build an engine to the gills and it becomes even less reliable and more prone to issues than a stock one?

I personally have learned my lesson, hopefully you get something out of your experience and you get back to having a reliable engine.
Where does the blame lie for the missing Teflon rings?
Me. I was the one who handled the cams. I had no idea there are supposed to be those rings. I removed the cams myself. I don't remember seeing them. I certainly don't know how they went missing, other than there was a decent amount of time between removal and re-install so maybe someone at my buddies shop handled them and knocked them off. I have no idea. It's just a very expensive (time-wise, and certainly money-wise) lesson, I guess.
 
OP
OP
HKusp

HKusp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
2,875
Location
Hampton, Md.
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
Damn…how many times did you want to set it all on fire? Glad it’s figured out as it’s no fun chasing issues and you can’t enjoy the car. We’ve all been there if you do this hobby long enough!
A lot!!!
 

robvas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2023
Threads
15
Messages
3,492
Reaction score
3,281
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
2011 GT
Me. I was the one who handled the cams. I had no idea there are supposed to be those rings. I removed the cams myself. I don't remember seeing them. I certainly don't know how they went missing, other than there was a decent amount of time between removal and re-install so maybe someone at my buddies shop handled them and knocked them off. I have no idea. It's just a very expensive (time-wise, and certainly money-wise) lesson, I guess.
Ahh that feeling sucks. At least you'll never make that mistake again!
 
OP
OP
HKusp

HKusp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
2,875
Location
Hampton, Md.
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
Now the bitch of it is getting on the header studs to get them off to remove the heads. It's very very tight in there and we're on the drivers side. The passenger side is worse..

20250520_202816.jpg


20250520_202824.jpg
 
Last edited:

engineermike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Threads
31
Messages
6,188
Reaction score
6,450
Location
La
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10
... He said there are teflon rings under the cam caps at the very front where it bridges between the two cams. They were missing. It helps keep oil up in the top of the heads and oils the cams.
I could be wrong, but I don't think this is correct. At least not on the intake side. The teflon rings are there on the exhaust cam, front journal only. The reason they are there is because they prevent "control oil" from escaping through the bearing clearance rather than moving to the phaser. The exhaust cam phasers work by routing control oil back and forth through passages in the journal that lead to the phasers. If the oil leaks out of the bearing clearance, you don't have control of the phaser.

In the following pic, you can see shiny strips in the head journal where the teflon strips ride. Again, this is exhaust only. The grooves are there for the control oil, one groove for advance and one for retard. The intake journal has no shiny strips.
1747789192252-di.jpg


The following pic is the front cam journals. You can see the teflon strips in the exhaust cams only, that coincide with the shiny strips in the head above.
1747789302960-gb.webp


If the strips are missing, you'll just lose control of the exhaust cam phasers.
 

Sponsored
OP
OP
HKusp

HKusp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
2,875
Location
Hampton, Md.
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
I could be wrong, but I don't think this is correct. At least not on the intake side. The teflon rings are there on the exhaust cam, front journal only. The reason they are there is because they prevent "control oil" from escaping through the bearing clearance rather than moving to the phaser. The exhaust cam phasers work by routing control oil back and forth through passages in the journal that lead to the phasers. If the oil leaks out of the bearing clearance, you don't have control of the phaser.

In the following pic, you can see shiny strips in the head journal where the teflon strips ride. Again, this is exhaust only. The grooves are there for the control oil, one groove for advance and one for retard. The intake journal has no shiny strips.
1747789192252-di.jpg


The following pic is the front cam journals. You can see the teflon strips in the exhaust cams only, that coincide with the shiny strips in the head above.
1747789302960-gb.jpg


If the strips are missing, you'll just lose control of the exhaust cam phasers.
Yes, you and I have chatted about this. I am going to see what's what on this new set.
 
OP
OP
HKusp

HKusp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
2,875
Location
Hampton, Md.
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
I could be wrong, but I don't think this is correct. At least not on the intake side. The teflon rings are there on the exhaust cam, front journal only. The reason they are there is because they prevent "control oil" from escaping through the bearing clearance rather than moving to the phaser. The exhaust cam phasers work by routing control oil back and forth through passages in the journal that lead to the phasers. If the oil leaks out of the bearing clearance, you don't have control of the phaser.

In the following pic, you can see shiny strips in the head journal where the teflon strips ride. Again, this is exhaust only. The grooves are there for the control oil, one groove for advance and one for retard. The intake journal has no shiny strips.
1747789192252-di.jpg


The following pic is the front cam journals. You can see the teflon strips in the exhaust cams only, that coincide with the shiny strips in the head above.
1747789302960-gb.webp


If the strips are missing, you'll just lose control of the exhaust cam phasers.
Mike is correct. That guy was full of shit. I just confirmed those rings are just on the exhaust cams, not the intake and they were in tact on the old cams, so that was not the reason for the failure. The damaged heads are off the block and the PAC springs are on the heads that are going back on the car. We're on the downhill side of getting this thing back together. It's just finding time and the weather cooperating because the car is in @HAVOC_5.0 's driveway, not my garage.

20250605_201134.jpg


20250605_201137.jpg


20250605_201141.jpg


20250605_201152.jpg


20250605_201156.jpg


20250605_212301.jpg


20250605_212250.jpg
 

HAVOC_5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2023
Threads
4
Messages
536
Reaction score
790
Location
Maryland
First Name
Phil
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT
This car is going to be the death of me…

On a side note, the Mobile Tech that I had come out to look at the car can only go off of the information provided to him by the Books provided by Ford. Of course, all the catalogs are wrong (had a similar issue saying that my Vin had a 2 bolt starter but for sure, my car was a 3 bolt, as well as other issues with hardware as well).

The plus side to all of this is that we are on the downhill now. I want Jason to get his car back as quickly as possible. Just hard to juggle a full time career, my kid, upcoming wedding in August, and little to no extra time. We’ll get there buddy!
 

Whitedevil95

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2019
Threads
55
Messages
1,057
Reaction score
882
Location
Temecula, CA
First Name
J.P.
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mach 1 HP
Damn so does this mean there is still no known reason for the failure?
 

HAVOC_5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2023
Threads
4
Messages
536
Reaction score
790
Location
Maryland
First Name
Phil
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT
Damn so does this mean there is still no known reason for the failure?
My only thoughts on this are the following:

1. Seeing a Timing Event when the cams are supposed to be in the Neutral Position indicated a Camshaft Failure.

2. The PBH Oil Pan and Pickup Tube debacle. While it may have seemed okay, not having the pickup tube fully engaged and slightly loose, MAY have caused the Oil Pressure Issue.

Regardless, multiple issues found, through lots of time and money, and hopefully this is the rest of the problems and no more are found.
Sponsored

 
 








Top