5.0 Dyno Chart Compilation

[Karrottop009]

2018 Mustang GT
Tremec Magnum XL
4.09 rear end
Lund E85R
Steeda closed airbox
VMP Twin 69mm
Cobrajet manifold
Comp Cams Stage 2 NSR (non thumpr)
Comp .600 lift beehive spring kit
Kooks 1 7/8 long tubes with green cats
X-pipe
Borla S-type axle back

Dynojet read 108F, would guess a DA of 2000-3000. Notice the graph is plotted with time, not rpm. My last dyno was 3 years ago in roughly same conditions but different dynojet. Made 434/394 with just x-pipe and muffler delete at that time. Gains down low are unreal, so torque comes in like a Camaro. Going to put a Borla resonator because it is way too loud right now...

Sponsored

 

[deanm11]

2018 Mustang GT
Tremec Magnum XL
4.09 rear end
Lund E85R
Steeda closed airbox
VMP Twin 69mm
Cobrajet manifold
Comp Cams Stage 2 NSR (non thumpr)
Comp .600 lift beehive spring kit
Kooks 1 7/8 long tubes with green cats
X-pipe
Borla S-type axle back

Dynojet read 108F, would guess a DA of 2000-3000. Notice the graph is plotted with time, not rpm. My last dyno was 3 years ago in roughly same conditions but different dynojet. Made 434/394 with just x-pipe and muffler delete at that time. Gains down low are unreal, so torque comes in like a Camaro. Going to put a Borla resonator because it is way too loud right now...

Thank you for sharing, not a lot of dynos with cams and/or CJ manifold out there. Great news that the mid range didn't get hit with the CJ/cam setup. The 4.09s are eating some power. I have the same Kooks w/ std. cats and S-type but knew I needed to tone it down so I have a Magnaflow 12469 center muffler/resonator that I put on when I installed the Kooks. I'll post here in a minute - I'm "FBO' without CJ, no cams on pump "E72" - 471/426 SAE. The "FBO E85 is 500rwhp", certainly through a reasonable exhaust is not realistic.

You should ask the shop for the 'run files' If the RPM pickup was working you can re-graph against RPM. And display unadjusted power AND SAE power. Your printout is 'STD' which is also conditions adjusted or a standard 'DA'. The unadjusted would be lower and reflective of the temp you mention. SAE will be about 10 lower than STD.

 

[deanm11]

2020 Mustang GT Base
10r80
3.55 Ecoboost donor rear
Pump "E72" (tested)
hptuners tuned by me
Steeda closed air box
Kooks 1 7/8 with standard cats
Magnaflow 12469 mid muffler/resonator
Ported stock manifold and throttle body
Dyoned on 275-40-17 Nitto drag radials
QA1 carbon fiber driveshat, DSS LH 800hp axle

471/426 SAE

Overall, the car is a beast on the street. With torque reduction reduced/removed (not reflective in dyno here) and all the FBO/Ethanol power, it's a totally different animal than when I drove it home from VA to NJ last fall.

Car trapped 125.94 but only 11.47 with 1.91 60ft in May. Dyno/tuning from a few days ago here. I picked up almost 10hp in the racing power range above 5000rpm from the tuning session.

SAE shown with graph showing correction levels.

The green line run is shown to show the correct approximate low-end power.. my ending tune reflects that, which the red peak hp graph does not. I was doing a lot of A-B tuning on the dyno and didn't have the time to pick the best through the rpm range while the dyno rental clock was running... so my final run (which also ran out further in rpm) doesn't reflect my best results and final tune below 4000rpm.

The final graph shown in a zero in of my off the street baseline to last run, zeroing in above 5000rpm where this run does reflect my final tune. The pickup was a little from another a couple degrees of timing (to about 29.5-30.5) and from tweaking cam timing. My analysis shows moving shift points higher than my current 7400rpm would not be fruitful.

The owner of the shop says he runs 10-15hp low at this power level to other dynojets. I don't claim this is the case necessarily but just for full disclosure. He has a heavier drum than most to handle the higher hp cars he traffics in; I'm not sure why the adjustment in the dynojet software would be off necessarily. To show how the run is impacted by heavy drum mass, for example, my entire run was about 15 seconds - with a standard mass drum it would be under 10. I've known and used this shop back to the 90s.

 

[carguy231]

At the wheels:
Power: 546 at 6840-rpm Torque: 518 at 4350-rpm

Edlebrock E-Force Stage 2 50-state legal kit for 91-octane pump gas. Comes with legal tune, fuel pump, injectors, plugs, hoses, belt, idler, CAI and SCT BDX scan tool.
DynoJet at GTR High Performance in Rancho Cucamunga, Kalifornia
85+ degrees, dry as a bone.
Dyno thru all gears, three pulls.

I'm pretty pleased for an out-of-the-box baseline on my daily driver that will also pass SMOG.

I don't know what the actual boost is set for from EB with the kit's pulley. I really need a boost gauge. The other thing I did not check was whether the 'track only' setting was activated to shut off the traction control, etc.. This is probably on 'normal' setting.

More info in signature.

 

[bnightstar]

2017 GT EU Spec only mod is K&N Drop in filter.

 

[Wernerj18]

2015 PP mt82 paxton 2200sl. Could've got 600 if I let him rev higher lol. Told the tuner to stop after increasing timing once to save my clutch. 80 some degrees and 80% humidity. It lost connection for a second during the pull. That's why the torque graph is funky.

 

[NightmareMoon]

2016 Mustang GT, 72k miles on the odo.
Mods - Stock (only K&N panel filter and a slightly lighter flywheel, stock headers and midpipe, Roush AB)
93 octane, Dynojet
85 degrees, low humidity, 500ft altitude, 5w30 oil.

So this is a 'before' chart for a baseline before mods coming soon. Pretty happy to hit even ~408 rwhp in this near-stock car with +70k hard miles.

 

[cahouston]

My 2020 first dyno is at the end of this thread just now. I am stock with Borla S-type but you had active exhaust. I am down 17hp to your #s, but what is more interesting and a puzzle to me is how your car just doesn't drop off at the top end.

I end the run at about 300 torque, you keep climbing to shut-down with +50 torque, though probably at lower rpm than me. Do you know what rpm you shut-down when your run stopped pulling at about 155mph? My run went to 163mph with a short-ish tire. Stock PP1 tire is +1" at 27.66" to me and thus less gearing which should mean a higher mph. If your stock calibratoin allowed pull to 7400rpm, you have a theoretical 172mph as I did. I believe my 163mph must be about right with the converter unlocked. The math indicates your run would have stopped at around 7000-7100rpm if you have a similar to my 5% converter slip

I'm sorry for such a delayed response. I missed this. My car is on the stock PP1 wheels/tires, has 3.55 gear, and was dynoed in 7th gear. I believe the run ended just under 6700 rpm due to the stock limiter. I don't have the run file so I used a calculator to approximate the RPM from the speed, rear gear, trans gear ratio, and tire height. That is probably why the HP is still appearing to climb and torque hasn't dropped off as much as yours as a lot changes past the 7000 RPM mark on an otherwise stock tune.

 

[karpetcm]

2019 Mustang Gt A10. Tuned E85, JLT Intake and AWE Touring Catback. Dynojet. 75 ambient Temps run done in 6th gear. SAE Corrected Numbers. 443 RWHP 410 RWTQ best numbers.

 

[deanm11]

2019 Mustang Gt A10. E85, JLT Intake and AWE Touring Catback. Dynojet. 75 ambient Temps run done in 6th gear. SAE Corrected Numbers. 443 RWHP 410 RWTQ best numbers.

Very nice, thank you for sharing. If your runs were in 6th, you are a bit lower than you'd get running in 7th. No tune? If you go with longtubes and tune, you should hopefully pick up 20-30+hp/torque over a wide range. (compare to my runs above). I wonder why the Air/Fuel is showing ratios that are correct for regular gas, not E85..

 

[karpetcm]

Very nice, thank you for sharing. If your runs were in 6th, you are a bit lower than you'd get running in 7th. No tune? If you go with longtubes and tune, you should hopefully pick up 20-30+hp/torque over a wide range. (compare to my runs above). I wonder why the Air/Fuel is showing ratios that are correct for regular gas, not E85..

Thank you . I revised it to say Tuned e85 but you have to be tuned to run e85 i would not dare to run it without a datalog tune. Takes time to dial it in right. He said he wont do it in 7th due to hitting the top speed limiter and he would do it in 6th so not sure. On the a/f wasnt sure why it was showing on point with 91/93 cars were on my cars speedo im low 8's a/f at wide open throttle. That was strange to me as well.

 

[Flyhalf]

Thank you . I revised it to say Tuned e85 but you have to be tuned to run e85 i would not dare to run it without a datalog tune. Takes time to dial it in right. He said he wont do it in 7th due to hitting the top speed limiter and he would do it in 6th so not sure. On the a/f wasnt sure why it was showing on point with 91/93 cars were on my cars speedo im low 8's a/f at wide open throttle. That was strange to me as well.

1:1 is 7th many dynojet owners swpaped to the new software which goes in red error for max speed reached.
Also fyi apperently btw old and new software there can be up to 3% reading difference (12-15whp)

 

[Flyhalf]

SAE vs STD filter on dynojet =15 whp difference

Ps. Headers didnt add that much more to the catback. (Maybe 3whp) but more tq (20 ish)

 

[karpetcm]

SAE vs STD filter on dynojet =15 whp difference

Ps. Headers didnt add that much more to the catback. (Maybe 3whp) but more tq (20 ish)

very nice numbers, your torque is definitely improved especially over my car those headers did a good job. I told myself if i hit SAE 450whp for the mods i have ill be happy. At 443 in 6th gear pull I'm ok with that. Is what it is. When i get a chance to take it to the track i wanna see if she can run ok. Hoping for 12-12.1 at 118-119mph.

 

[Flyhalf]

very nice numbers, your torque is definitely improved especially over my car those headers did a good job. I told myself if i hit SAE 450whp for the mods i have ill be happy. At 443 in 6th gear pull I'm ok with that. Is what it is. When i get a chance to take it to the track i wanna see if she can run ok. Hoping for 12-12.1 at 118-119mph.

443 is great on 6th.
I never did a 1/4mile
Only roadcourse. But i wanna try !!

Sponsored