krahooligan
Well-Known Member
i broke 30 MPG on my way to San diego the other day. 45 miles. some traffic. yay fuel economy.
Sponsored
If you read the manual it explains the difference. The computer is average fuel economy based on time. It averages a bunch of instantaneous outputs rather than continuously calculating the distance travelled over the amount of fuel burned since last reset. The difference is minor but it does exist.Anybody ever bother to manually check the mpg the old fashioned way? You may be surprised at what you find. The computer is almost always a bit optimistic. I've tracked my mpg in my GT over 4 tanks and The computer is always higher. Seeing variances between as little as .3 all the way to a whole 4mpg difference. Most of them were 1-3mpg off per tank of gas.
My Normal commute is mostly city, so I usually land in the 15-17 mpg range. That's with heavy A/C and seat cooler usage though.
There is a name for that: JimmyTwoTimes drivingu guys getting 24+ mpg are still shocking me. you guys must not go past 15% throttle and always below 3k rpms or something.
Wonder why this is. I know that the computer will be taking readings at a set sampling rate, and the sensor will be calibrated but there will be some variation with different sensors. I wondered if the sampling rate or lack of proper calibration is causing most of the discrepancy. If it has a low sampling rate (to save power, or something else) then many of the throttle stabs may be missed by it and it will become more inaccurate the more you stab rather than smoothly apply the throttle. One could reason, if this was the case, the higher the mileage that you get, the more accurate it would become. Second is lack of accuracy of the sensor, which would lead to inaccuracy across the board, or would be affected more by environment or other fixed factors then driving behavior. I guess without some detailed analysis, we will never know...If you read the manual it explains the difference. The computer is average fuel economy based on time. It averages a bunch of instantaneous outputs rather than continuously calculating the distance travelled over the amount of fuel burned since last reset. The difference is minor but it does exist.
That is really a moot point...i'd challenge everyone bragging here to post their lifetime mpg with the car.
2k or less.There is a name for that: JimmyTwoTimes driving![]()
I've just rolled over 1000 miles in a GT convertible. In mostly stop-and-go commuting traffic in the hilly Bay Area, I get around 14 MPG, and I am not driving it hard. I saw 20 MPG once on its single road trip up the coast, but that was with the top down, all four seats and the trunk filled and various slow stretches to enjoy the scenery. Perhaps one day I will see the mythical 25-30 MPG...one can only dream.