Sponsored

Cobra99

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2020
Threads
5
Messages
238
Reaction score
252
Location
Canada
Vehicle(s)
Too Many
LOL. You have point, but I don't think that's where he was coming from.

Ford basically sent an old engine design and a regular mustang to multimatic. that's the credit ford gets.

Multimatic gets all the credit for the GTD being the GTD.
Fair enough. I know Multimatic gets a lot of credit, but say nothing about Ford scream ignorance. A lot of the tech come from the racing program. I bet the same for GM.
Sponsored

 

robvas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2023
Threads
15
Messages
3,494
Reaction score
3,282
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
2011 GT
Other than bringing in Multimatic for the GT & GTD, I’m not sure that Ford outsources much of their engineering. Manufacturing of parts, yes, but almost all OEM’s do that.
Roush has traditionally done a lot of work for Ford, especially aftermarket and racing programs (not saying they did anything on the GTD, though)
 

MAGS1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2020
Threads
96
Messages
11,322
Reaction score
18,547
Location
Somewhere in Middle America
First Name
Mark
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT
Roush has traditionally done a lot of work for Ford, especially aftermarket and racing programs (not saying they did anything on the GTD, though)
They have, although they’re kinda like Shelby these days. Just bolt on some parts and a tune. But they’re starting with a completed Ford car, that Ford did the engineering on and that Ford wrote the software for. The amount of R&D and engineering they’re doing is very minimal compared to the car that Ford provided them with.

GTD (and even more so the GT before it), gets to Multimatic as a blank shell. From there, both teams worked to come up with basically a race car for the street. Multimatic brings its racing experience/expertise and Ford brings its team of engineers (that also likely have racing experience) for the street piece of it. And the money, Ford is the one with the deep pockets here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OX1

13GetThere

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2019
Threads
1
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
1,255
Location
Kentucky
First Name
Lynn
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT Premium PP2 Magnet Grey
I keep hearing about GM and Ford. What about that other car company Stillaintus?
 

9secondko

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
2,264
Reaction score
1,410
Location
Irvine, ca
Vehicle(s)
2003 cobra
I keep hearing about GM and Ford. What about that other car company Stillaintus?
They pooped the bed and are now cleaning it up. They sort of carved out a niche with fat sloppy cars that had huge power. And then they threw it in the trash can. Now that that experiment is over, If they can get their chassis teams in order, they are a force. Their engine tech is killer. Imagine a new high displacement hemi with turbos. yikes. Probably looking at 1500+ hp. but if they don't offer a lighter sports car or a new Viper type (likely midengine this time around) Ford and Chevy have nothing to worry about.
 

Sponsored

Hack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Threads
86
Messages
12,804
Reaction score
8,215
Location
Minneapolis
Vehicle(s)
Mustang, Challenger
Ford isn't known for it's engineering, it out sources it. Gm does almost all of their own engineering. I like Ford and have owned nothing but Ford or GM. Sure they helped, but, I don't look at it as a Ford, I see it as a Multimatic. Nothing wrong with that, but the credit goes to Multimatic for me.
According to online sources, most automobile manufacturers outsource engineering. Most of the outsourcing is items like brakes, seats, wiring harnesses and other peripherals. Obviously Brembo and Recaro are examples, as well as the fancy DSSV shocks that are patented by Multimatic and built exclusively by them and used on high performance GM vehicles. The major brands do the integration of those components, and that is true for Ford as much as GM. Both companies employ 150,000+ engineers full time.

Apparently in 2025 Ford Vice Chair John Lawler said IC engines are not a major brand differentiator and Ford would be outsourcing them. With attitudes like that in the board room, it's no wonder Ford hasn't made anything I want to buy in the last 5 years.

For all the carbon fiber in it, the GTD design is way too heavy. And apparently it's also way too expensive to build. To the point where the pricing is completely non-competitive. I don't think it's unfair to even say the price is a joke. It's beyond silly.

My expectation is that Ford engineers did the design work of the GTD and Multimatic does the build. It makes sense that Multimatic has employees more suited to this type of low volume build compared to Ford. I believe the main failure point on the GTD was Ford. Frankly I don't see the GTD as a success with its current weight, price and powertrain.

New product development engineering can be totally handcuffed by management, marketing and accounting, though. I would lay odds that this happened with both the S650 and GTD. All S650 Mustangs should have shared the transaxle architecture and costs. A redesign of the chassis where the back half of the bodies in white for the GTD didn't have to be cut out probably would have gotten the GTD weight down as well.
 

9secondko

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
2,264
Reaction score
1,410
Location
Irvine, ca
Vehicle(s)
2003 cobra
Be interesting to see where the new grand sport c8 fits in this conversation.

all new v8 and another model with the v8 plus electric. I they’re really going for it.

I can see a new Camaro coming out with this same combo.

and that should drive ford to develop new v8 engines and go for it as well.
 

OX1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Threads
5
Messages
411
Reaction score
230
Location
Jackson NJ
Vehicle(s)
86 Capri 5.0 Turbo, 17 Fusion Sport, 21 GT500 CFTP
LOL No! I can speak my mind like anyone else on here. Not bashing Ford, just giving props to the correct company. The 5.2 wasn't designed for the GTD, it is just used in it. I like GM and Ford, that doesn't mean that I think that they are infallible.
Sorry, but this statement "Ford isn't known for it's engineering, it out sources it. Gm does almost all of their own engineering" Does not sound like it's describing ONLY the GTD.
 

Sponsored

geep81

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2018
Threads
57
Messages
1,390
Reaction score
1,414
Location
Cleveland OH
Vehicle(s)
2020 GT Premium
haters gonna hate. Car looks awesome. Has likely 800 hp. Ford will sell every single 1 of them. For 100k name something better
Big Mustang and Ford fan here.

A comparable BMW M car with AWD is gonna dust this thing at the strip and on the street for the same price is my guess. (it won't sound or look nearly as good doing it)
 

Franky16

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2025
Threads
8
Messages
131
Reaction score
105
Location
Hurricane ut
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
23 MACH 1
Big Mustang and Ford fan here.

A comparable BMW M car with AWD is gonna dust this thing at the strip and on the street for the same price is my guess. (it won't sound or look nearly as good doing it)
yeah but you have to wear a skirt and a flat billed hat to drive a bmw
 

OX1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Threads
5
Messages
411
Reaction score
230
Location
Jackson NJ
Vehicle(s)
86 Capri 5.0 Turbo, 17 Fusion Sport, 21 GT500 CFTP
Big Mustang and Ford fan here.

A comparable BMW M car with AWD is gonna dust this thing at the strip and on the street for the same price is my guess. (it won't sound or look nearly as good doing it)
Street yes, but strip?? (with some bolt ons). Pretty easy to get power out of Predator.......



Supposedly "75 grand" worth of engine/mods??

 

PVAMT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Threads
19
Messages
313
Reaction score
263
Location
Raleigh NC
First Name
Pete
Vehicle(s)
2016 GTPP Deep impact blue / silver stripes, red pinstripes
Vehicle Showcase
4
 








Top