Sponsored

275/45/19 on 19x9.5?

greystang50

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2025
Threads
3
Messages
8
Reaction score
4
Location
Carrizo Springs Tx
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2020 mustang gt pp1
Ive been looking through all the threads and cant find anyone that has 275/45/19 on 19x9.5 wheels. The reason im curious is because I already lowerd my car with lowering springs and new shocks/struts and now im trying to get my fitment looking even. i have a 275/40/19x9.5 square setup currently and the front tucks in more…so I was wondering if 275/45/19 would affect the performance too much on the rear
Sponsored

 
OP
OP

greystang50

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2025
Threads
3
Messages
8
Reaction score
4
Location
Carrizo Springs Tx
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2020 mustang gt pp1
Seems like an odd size go with. Tire selection is limited

also 28.7" tall
I already have continental dws06 plus on the car and I saw they do have the same tires in 275/45/19, Im mostly worried about how much it would affect my ability to take turns
 

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
62
Messages
7,155
Reaction score
6,443
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP w/ Voodoo
Vehicle Showcase
1
Its an inch taller, so your rake will be 0.5” more extreme and I think thats going to me more distracting than any additional 0.5” of tuck. That much tire and rake will look like a drag car.

what does raising the rear do? I think raising the rear cg will make the car oversteer more entering corners and the rear will be more squirmy in general when cornering due to the taller sidewall the rear will feel less precise. Not entirely certain about the effects of rake because most people tune car car ride height with springnot tire diameter.

it probably doesnt handle great with the spring drop on the front axle anyway.

how crazy is the idea? Well its probably not the craziest, but it wont help the cornering. The car wont likely explode, but to be honest I dont know what tire diameter you can run before start to have firment issues in the rear. Someone else may know.
 

Sponsored

Mach 307

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2023
Threads
104
Messages
1,410
Reaction score
2,300
Location
Illinois
First Name
Alec
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang Mach 1 Premium HP – TR-3160 | 2008 Toyota Yaris Hatchback
I think looks good as is.
 

rxryanm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2019
Threads
12
Messages
672
Reaction score
890
Location
KY
First Name
Ryan
Vehicle(s)
2019 GTP PP1
What is it exactly you're trying to get even? Second pic looks pretty even to me.

If you buy a taller tire, that's only going to exacerbate how much it looks like the front is tucking.
 

kz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Threads
62
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
2,934
Location
West Chester, OH
Vehicle(s)
Mustangs & F150
Ive been looking through all the threads and cant find anyone that has 275/45/19 on 19x9.5 wheels. The reason im curious is because I already lowerd my car with lowering springs and new shocks/struts and now im trying to get my fitment looking even. i have a 275/40/19x9.5 square setup currently and the front tucks in more…so I was wondering if 275/45/19 would affect the performance too much on the rear
If your car is a manual, it will be really slow in a 1st and 2nd gear with that tall of the tire (in addition to what others wrote above) - it's already slow with 275/40R19.
 

robvas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2023
Threads
16
Messages
3,640
Reaction score
3,439
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
2011 GT
If your car is a manual, it will be really slow in a 1st and 2nd gear with that tall of the tire (in addition to what others wrote above) - it's already slow with 275/40R19.
Meanwhile we have people saying 1st is too short to use in the MT-82
 

kz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Threads
62
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
2,934
Location
West Chester, OH
Vehicle(s)
Mustangs & F150
Meanwhile we have people saying 1st is too short to use in the MT-82
Depends on the version - 2018+ (MT-82D4) has really tall gearing, especially 2nd with max speed on stock tire of 75mph or so (for 3.73 rear end ration which is the shortest)
2015-2017 was much shorter, 58 mph I think max speed in 2nd, same read end and tire.

With engine torque being the same, 2018+ just isn't really moving....
 

Sponsored
OP
OP

greystang50

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2025
Threads
3
Messages
8
Reaction score
4
Location
Carrizo Springs Tx
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2020 mustang gt pp1
If your car is a manual, it will be really slow in a 1st and 2nd gear with that tall of the tire (in addition to what others wrote above) - it's already slow with 275/40R19.
Its not manual
 

robvas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2023
Threads
16
Messages
3,640
Reaction score
3,439
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
2011 GT
Depends on the version - 2018+ (MT-82D4) has really tall gearing, especially 2nd with max speed on stock tire of 75mph or so (for 3.73 rear end ration which is the shortest)
2015-2017 was much shorter, 58 mph I think max speed in 2nd, same read end and tire.

With engine torque being the same, 2018+ just isn't really moving....
Agreed
 

CrazyHippie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2023
Threads
11
Messages
894
Reaction score
1,110
Location
Michigan
First Name
Craig
Vehicle(s)
2023 Mustang GT/CS
Its an inch taller, so your rake will be 0.5” more extreme and I think thats going to me more distracting than any additional 0.5” of tuck. That much tire and rake will look like a drag car.

what does raising the rear do? I think raising the rear cg will make the car oversteer more entering corners and the rear will be more squirmy in general when cornering due to the taller sidewall the rear will feel less precise. Not entirely certain about the effects of rake because most people tune car car ride height with springnot tire diameter.

it probably doesnt handle great with the spring drop on the front axle anyway.

how crazy is the idea? Well its probably not the craziest, but it wont help the cornering. The car wont likely explode, but to be honest I dont know what tire diameter you can run before start to have firment issues in the rear. Someone else may know.
I think that the increased diameter is only 0.54 inches. (5% of 275mm). I don't think that this much of an increase will affect handling much at all - maybe increase understeer a bit in corners which could be adjusted out. I actually think that it would look good on this car.
 

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
62
Messages
7,155
Reaction score
6,443
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP w/ Voodoo
Vehicle Showcase
1
I think that the increased diameter is only 0.54 inches. (5% of 275mm). I don't think that this much of an increase will affect handling much at all - maybe increase understeer a bit in corners which could be adjusted out. I actually think that it would look good on this car.
While certain tires may vary, the calculators say its a full inch diameter, that's +0.5" radius, so 0.5" lift under the axle and the tires goes up 0.5" into the fender.
 

MAGS1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2020
Threads
96
Messages
11,452
Reaction score
18,785
Location
Somewhere in Middle America
First Name
Mark
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT
I think that the increased diameter is only 0.54 inches. (5% of 275mm). I don't think that this much of an increase will affect handling much at all - maybe increase understeer a bit in corners which could be adjusted out. I actually think that it would look good on this car.
Nope, it’s an inch

IMG_2174.webp
Sponsored

 
 








Top