Angrey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2020
- Threads
- 104
- Messages
- 2,794
- Reaction score
- 2,984
- Location
- Coral Gables
- Vehicle(s)
- 2016 GT350
Hey, all I know is, you're not trapping 175 mph on a 3900 lb car + driver with normal P1X limited.
A crude calculator assuming the driver is 100 lb female would mean a 3975 lb car + driver to trap 175 mph in the 1/4 mile would need nearly 1500 rwhp.
Procharger's own literature rates the P1X max CFM to be 1275 cfm and a max of 950 horsepower.
Something is fishy here. I'm not questioning that the car could trap 175. But either A) it weighs less than 3875 or B) It's making way more steam than a "normal" P1X that you and I could buy makes (maybe both).
If this keeps up, I'm going to start putting Procharger in the same camp as the ESS exaggerists.
I'm open to the idea of wild outcomes, but something isn't adding up here.
A crude calculator assuming the driver is 100 lb female would mean a 3975 lb car + driver to trap 175 mph in the 1/4 mile would need nearly 1500 rwhp.
Procharger's own literature rates the P1X max CFM to be 1275 cfm and a max of 950 horsepower.
Something is fishy here. I'm not questioning that the car could trap 175. But either A) it weighs less than 3875 or B) It's making way more steam than a "normal" P1X that you and I could buy makes (maybe both).
If this keeps up, I'm going to start putting Procharger in the same camp as the ESS exaggerists.
I'm open to the idea of wild outcomes, but something isn't adding up here.
Sponsored