- Banned
- #31
You're not supposed to sing the 'Uber Alles' version...exactly so either leave the PP1 alone or source one from the Mach1.
Chassis lean is a good thing (within reason). I don't get this 'flat-ride uber alles' stuff.
Sponsored
You're not supposed to sing the 'Uber Alles' version...exactly so either leave the PP1 alone or source one from the Mach1.
Chassis lean is a good thing (within reason). I don't get this 'flat-ride uber alles' stuff.
For reference, the HPP model has a 34mm FARB & 24mm RARB.I made that
Except I lost the screenshot I had so time to save it again haha
Lol @ figuring out how dampers work.The shear number of options these engineers come up with is pretty silly. Look at those front springs.
194 #/in
211 #/in
240 #/in
251 #/in
268 #/in
For sure there are at least this many others in the mix when you add the various versions of GT and Eco.
Those could easily be reduced to two, maybe a 220 & 270 #/in. If you wanted a softer spring for the 'daily' GT's, then maybe throw a 170 in the mix. They should spend a less time tinkering with meaningless spring rate changes and a little more time figuring out how dampers work.
You're less cynical than I am. My guess would be they have a ride and handling lead engineer on each variation of the car. That engineer wants to justify his position by spec'ing a slightly different rate than the next, but not so different that any negative comment about the car can be genuinely criticized or likely even felt. So everyone works prove they deserve a paycheck while staying in the box which some internal Alpha dog previously established.For the OEM, I'm sure they have some internal targets for ride frequency or body roll or something. Spec'ing a different shock valving or spring rate is not even a speedbump in their pipeline. They just don't need to share springs across vehicles for such a simple and known quantity part.
Having worked on legacy products, yeah, you need to color between the already established lines.You're less cynical than I am. My guess would be they have a ride and handling lead engineer on each variation of the car. That engineer wants to justify his position by spec'ing a slightly different rate than the next, but not so different that any negative comment about the car can be genuinely criticized or likely even felt. So everyone works prove they deserve a paycheck while staying in the box which some internal Alpha dog previously established.
I'm not very good at that. Admittedly, my approach has both positive and negative qualities.Having worked on legacy products, yeah, you need to color between the already established lines.
That wouldn't be a bad way to go. Don't be scared to try a slightly more aggressive bar. The 'R' bars would compliment stock springs IMHO.A lot of good information here. I have a stock base 2021 ecoboost and have added the GT350 strut tower bar. Going off the information on this thread, is the census to use the GT350 or GT350R sway bars if I am not looking to go crazy at a track but to add more steering feel for street use? I actually prefer the stock springs/dampers as my wife and I do a lot of highway driving in this vehicle city to city here in Texas. It is surprisingly comfortable.
I have an Eco, too. I'll give you my take. Try the BMR 35mm Front bar. It adds a bit of response to the front and flattens roll a small amount. I did not find it increased understeer. In general, Eco's have less understeer than V8 cars (lower nose weight). I haven't found that I need all that much rear bar. In fact, I moved from a 24mm to a 20mm RARB because I prefer the added rear grip. Keep in mind, my driving style has a lot to do with this choice, so what I call 'balanced' and what you call 'balanced' might be significantly different.A lot of good information here. I have a stock base 2021 ecoboost and have added the GT350 strut tower bar. Going off the information on this thread, is the census to use the GT350 or GT350R sway bars if I am not looking to go crazy at a track but to add more steering feel for street use? I actually prefer the stock springs/dampers as my wife and I do a lot of highway driving in this vehicle city to city here in Texas. It is surprisingly comfortable.
| Swaybar | Front Rate | Rear Rate | Front Wheel Rate | Rear Wheel Rate | ||||
| GT PP | 295 | 123 | 290 | 75 | ||||
| GT350 | 350 | 130 | 344 | 79 | ||||
| GT350R | 350 | 230 | 344 | 140 | ||||
| BMR soft | 377 | 200 | 371 | 122 | ||||
| BMR med | 439 | 289 | 432 | 176 | ||||
| BMR stiff | 501 | 378 | 493 | 230 | ||||
| Eibach soft | 372 | 198 | 366 | 120 | ||||
| Eibach med | 475 | 234 | 467 | 142 | ||||
| Eibach stiff | 515 | 285 | 507 | 173 | ||||
| Steeda soft | 280 | 0 | 170 | |||||
| Steeda med soft | 350 | 0 | 213 | |||||
| Steeda med stiff | N/A | N/A | ||||||
| Steeda stiff | 425 | 0 | 259 | |||||
| Pedders soft | 455 | 170 | 448 | 103 | ||||
| Pedders med | 492 | 197 | 484 | 120 | ||||
| Pedders stiff | 530 | 224 | 522 | 136 |
Are you sure he's OK with you posting that?from Brian's spreadsheet. He might have updates but there isn't another public source that I know of.
his spreadsheet was public when I cloned it. So...Are you sure he's OK with you posting that?