Will Trump be impeached?

[Elvis66]

That could be taken the wrong way since you hear it every waking moment.

His liberal inbred theme song

Sponsored

 

[Elvis66]

No! Only when you are Elvis attempt to type! Heehee!

Hey Tony???...Trump just talk to me and says he wants to see you in his office.... You're fired..I guess they got enough transgender flight attendants at the airport.

 

[Weather Man]

When I read your posts, I hear the “Dueling Banjos” song in my head! Lolol

That's funny, when I read your posts I think TDS is just very sad to watch in action. I also see a guy advocating for the very people who want to end sports car ownership.

 

[Hack]

That's funny, when I read your posts I think TDS is just very sad to watch in action. I also see a guy advocating for the very people who want to end sports car ownership.

Not only that, but if you are liberal you should live in CA or NY. Then you can reap the benefits of living in a place with the liberal policies that you advocate.

Florida doesn't have any state income tax, @Tony T . What a terribly conservative place to live.

 

[94Mustang302ci]

Associated Press:
Attorney General William Barr declined to hold a press conference to clear President Donald Trump of wrongdoing in his phone call with the president of Ukraine, The Washington Post reported Wednesday.

People familiar with the matter told the Post that Trump wanted Barr to publicly state he had broken no laws when he pressured Ukraine’s leader to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, and his son during the July 25 phone call.

According to the Post, Trump put in a request for the press conference around Sept. 25. Around the same time, the White House released a summary of the call’s transcript that shows the president asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for a favor.

 

[Elvis66]

No! Only when you are Elvis attempt to type! Heehee!

Not only that, but if you are liberal you should live in CA or NY. Then you can reap the benefits of living in a place with the liberal policies that you advocate.

Florida doesn't have any state income tax, @Tony T . What a terribly conservative place to live.

Not only that, but if you are liberal you should live in CA or NY. Then you can reap the benefits of living in a place with the liberal policies that you advocate.

Florida doesn't have any state income tax, @Tony T . What a terribly conservative place to live.

Hey not all of that live in California are liberals... Definitely sucks I got to hide my weapons and and use watered down fuel and everything is overpriced and overrated.and mean hippies suck !!! But hey fuck you NYC!!

 

[Weather Man]

Associated Press:
Attorney General William Barr declined to hold a press conference to clear President Donald Trump of wrongdoing in his phone call with the president of Ukraine, The Washington Post reported Wednesday.

People familiar with the matter told the Post that Trump wanted Barr to publicly state he had broken no laws when he pressured Ukraine’s leader to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, and his son during the July 25 phone call.

According to the Post, Trump put in a request for the press conference around Sept. 25. Around the same time, the White House released a summary of the call’s transcript that shows the president asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for a favor.

Another steaming pile from the WP complete with sources familiar with and unnamed. Why would anyone quote that newspaper? They literally make shit up on the fly to suite their narrative.

 

[Weather Man]

 

[Tony T]

Do you want some cheese with your whine?

No, we’re not investigating Trump! We’re impeaching Trump!!

 

[Docscurlock]

Do you want some cheese with your whine?

No, we’re not investigating Trump! We’re impeaching Trump!!

No, we are not impeaching Trump we are railroading, tar and feathering him because he won't conform to the dems corruption like Bush did.

 

[Docscurlock]

Associated Press:
Attorney General William Barr declined to hold a press conference to clear President Donald Trump of wrongdoing in his phone call with the president of Ukraine, The Washington Post reported Wednesday.

People familiar with the matter told the Post that Trump wanted Barr to publicly state he had broken no laws when he pressured Ukraine’s leader to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, and his son during the July 25 phone call.

According to the Post, Trump put in a request for the press conference around Sept. 25. Around the same time, the White House released a summary of the call’s transcript that shows the president asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for a favor.

Funny, both Barr and Trump deny this ever took place.

 

[Tony T]

No, we are not impeaching Trump we are railroading, tar and feathering him because he won't conform to the dems corruption like Bush did.

Facts don’t lie! But Trump does daily.

You know how you can tell Trump is lying?

His mouth is moving...

 

[Weather Man]

Do you want some cheese with your whine?

No, we’re not investigating Trump! We’re impeaching Trump!!

No, not impeaching, just spraying manure.

A key Democratic witness against Trump admitted in congressional testimony last month that he was not part of the July 25 phone call between the U.S. and Ukrainian presidents, that he didn’t see a transcript or readout of it until late September when it was declassified and released, and that he has never even spoken to President Donald Trump.

William Taylor, the charge d’affairs of the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, told lawmakers in secret testimony two weeks ago that his opinions about an alleged quid pro quo demanded by Trump were formed largely from conversations with anti-Trump staffers within the diplomatic bureaucracy.

“[Y]ou’ve never spoken to Mr. [Rudy] Giuliani?” Taylor was asked.

“No, no,” he replied.

“Has anyone ever asked you to speak to Mr. Giuliani?”

“No,” Taylor said.

“And if I may, have you spoken to the president of the United States?” Taylor was asked.

“I have not,” he said.

“You had no communications with the president of the United States?”

“Correct,” Taylor said.

He also admitted he had never spoken to Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s chief of staff.

When asked who exactly he had spoken to about the brouhaha, Taylor confirmed that his only contacts about the matter were with John Bolton, the former national security adviser who was fired by Trump, Fiona Hill, Alexander Vindman, and Tim Morrison. Both Hill and Vindman are rumored to have been sources for the so-called whistleblower who filed a complaint against Trump in August.

Taylor also testified that his knowledge of the phone call between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymr Zelensky wasn’t first-hand knowledge.

“And this isn’t firsthand. It’s not secondhand. It’s not thirdhand,” Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., said to Taylor. “But if I understand this correctly, you’re telling us that Tim Morrison told you that Ambassador Sondland told him that the president told Ambassador Sondland that Zelensky would have to open an investigation into Biden?”

“That’s correct,” Taylor admitted.

Zeldin noted that the only reference to Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden in Taylor’s opening statement stemmed from that convoluted game of telephone. The New York lawmaker hammered Taylor for relying on third-hand information about the state of mind of an elected official to whom he had never spoken.

“So do you have any other source that the president’s goal in making this request was anything other than The New York Times?” Zeldin asked.

“I have not talked to the president,” Taylor said. “I have no other information from what the president was thinking.”

Under questioning from Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, Taylor also testified that the Ukrainian government wasn’t aware U.S. military funding had been temporarily suspended until late August, and then only after the information was leaked to the news media, meaning an alleged quid pro quo would have been impossible.

“So, if nobody in the Ukrainian government is aware of a military hold at the time of the Trump-Zelensky call, then, as a matter of law and as a matter of fact, there can be no quid pro quo, based on military aid,” Ratcliffe, a former federal prosecutor, said. “I just want to be real clear that, again, as of July 25th, you have no knowledge of a quid pro quo involving military aid.”

“July 25th is a week after the hold was put on the security assistance,” Taylor testified. “And July 25th, they had a conversation between the two presidents, where it was not discussed.”

“And to your knowledge, nobody in the Ukrainian government was aware of the hold?” Ratcliffe asked.

“That is correct,” Taylor responded.

Taylor also testified that he didn’t see any official readout of the July 25 phone call until it was declassified and released by Trump in late September.

“I did not see any official readout of the call until it was publicly released on September 25th,” he said.

 

[Docscurlock]

Facts don’t lie! But Trump does daily.

You know how you can tell Trump is lying?

His mouth is moving...

I've never heard that before.... Hey, how we doing on saving the world from global warming? I'm conserving gas and decided not to build a floating city of energy using, destruction causing, environment destroying vehicle of death for myself. Putting my money where my mouth is, turned my heat down to 64 degrees when I left the house this morning and will turn the heat down in the office to 64 tonight when I leave. I may plant a few pine trees this weekend too.

 

[Docscurlock]

“And this isn’t firsthand. It’s not secondhand. It’s not thirdhand,” Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., said to Taylor. “But if I understand this correctly, you’re telling us that Tim Morrison told you that Ambassador Sondland told him that the president told Ambassador Sondland that Zelensky would have to open an investigation into Biden?”

“That’s correct,” Taylor admitted.

Wow, that is definitely slam dunk proof of a quid pro quo, I think. Wait a minute, can anybody else follow this?

“So, if nobody in the Ukrainian government is aware of a military hold at the time of the Trump-Zelensky call, then, as a matter of law and as a matter of fact, there can be no quid pro quo, based on military aid,” Ratcliffe, a former federal prosecutor, said. “I just want to be real clear that, again, as of July 25th, you have no knowledge of a quid pro quo involving military aid.”

“July 25th is a week after the hold was put on the security assistance,” Taylor testified. “And July 25th, they had a conversation between the two presidents, where it was not discussed.”

“And to your knowledge, nobody in the Ukrainian government was aware of the hold?” Ratcliffe asked.

“That is correct,” Taylor responded.

I guess you lefties are right, a friend of a friend of a friend that has a cousin that works in the admin kinda said that Trump did something illegal. But the guy in the admin just cleans the urinals and thinks he heard this from someone who looked important because he had a suit on and carried a metal briefcase. This is worth putting the country on the brink of civil war for?

Sponsored