Spart
Well-Known Member
I will say one solution is to tighten everything up but enforce engine performance limits on the car till it’s fully warmed up. But that is like waving a red flag to a design problem inherent to the engine! But that could work. What a fuck up! And yes saying “fuck” is appropriate when the conditions warrant it!
I think this would be a good thing to have regardless of engine issues.Allowing water and oil temps to get into operating ranges is so much more critical on a motor capable of 7500 rpms. Jumping in cold car and going into the higher rpms to soon can be very detrimental to engine longevity. I bet quite a few people miss this pretty important (especially DOHC) step of owning a performance oriented engine.
My buddy's LC 500 has a DOHC 5.0L V8 with 470hp (sound familiar) and the car will slowly give you more and more redline as the engine warms. You can actually see the redline increase since the car has a digital cluster. Surely this wouldn't be difficult to implement with Ford's tech.
On my GT350, I'm always looking over at the oil temp gauge waiting for it to creep past 190. On cool days (car has an external oil cooler) it doesn't ever get there.
GT350's have piston slap issues also. Not sure whether the GT500 engines were known for it, the only example I've ever driven didn't seem to exhibit any piston slap.If this is indeed the cause I would imagine Ford decision makers may have at least for a while decided to absorb the more than a few actual bad engines. The sad thing is they would also have to implement the ''That's a normal noise'' answer to all the complaints that the service desk. I consider this a problem based on mass production cost cutting measures.
The outfit that previously handled the spray in liners for the GT500 and GT350 probably couldn't take on the large volume of work for a mass production engine so it was done on the cheap. Just speculation on my part.
My GT350 has piston slap during low-load situations when the engine is cold.
Sponsored