TURTL3
Well-Known Member
That's a good point in also highlighting how the Mustang could have beat both low end Camaro offerings by using the EB and 3.7 as two sides of the same coin. For example,This was a sad thing to watch, too. I think it was an excellent engine that was suddenly a bastard step-child. I miss that startup sound in the mornings...not that sound is everything, but the 2.3 just can't match it.
Level 1 (entry): Base V6, V6 performance pack
Level 2 (mid): EB base, premium, perf pack, premium performance pack
Level 3 (top): Every trim under the sun
I feel like between level 1 and 2 you've got a V6 that offers an interesting value proposition and with a performance pack, would offer up a really great value as a budget sports car. No premium packs, just base and performance.Level 2 gives you more torque, better fuel economy and more premium features. Level 3 speaks for itself. At that point, you've offered a better value than GM at every level. I wonder how many Camaro RS owners would be in a Mustang instead if they could at least get a performance pack. The GT is king of course, but I can't help but feel like Ford fumbled their lower level trims and instead of resoundingly kicking GM's ass, they left the door open a bit. I think GM beefing up their turbo offering is proof that they will try to make up ground in that segment.
Sponsored
It was a hideous AMC looking pile of rusted orange shit, but it was all I had and the horse was on the grille. I had lots of fun with that car. It's a generational thing that is exacerbated by guys who grew up in the 70's/80's like myself that had to see muscle cars get neutered and turn into square boring piles of shit. A cool car is a cool car. When a guy in at GT350 or Vette pull up, I don't feel they are looking down on me. If they do, I just laugh at their bald spot and corrective lenses 