Will Trump be impeached?

[GT Pony]

Their marriage is not my problem, maybe they have an open marriage. This is 2019.

All of his marriages and been "open marriages" in his mind ever since he married his 1st wife. Would you be OK with your wife going out and cheating on you ... would you consider yourself in an "open marriage" at that point and shrug if off? Could be now that you think it's a cool thing to do because Trump has done it. Didn't know that having to pay off you're "open marriage" lover was part of being in an open marriage.

Sponsored

 

[GT Pony]

See, you can't even argue your facts without some type of derision to Trump or a conservative. It is impossible for you to look at this fairly. I have accepted your position as a partisan leftie, drop it will ya.

You can't even argue you're defense of a lying, cheating, adulterating con-man ... now you're all OK with "open marriage" because it fits - and you claim to be a follower of God's word, lol. I'm sure you're all for the way ol' Moscow Mitch will handle the "fair trial".

 

[Docscurlock]

Well, why do you think Trump stonewalled it? They wanted more people to testify ... what's unfair about that?

And there were some people that did come testify that were supporting his admin because they probably didn't want go possibly go to jail later down the road. Did you even watch the House hearings, or just lapping up the Faux News summaries while it was going on?

Here's typical flip-flopping smoke and mirrors from Trump.
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...ove-to-have-officials-testify-but-is-fighting

PS - He's impeached, and history will show that occurred on Dec 18, 2019.

I did watch them, did you? Was the Inquiry fair? Until then, no impeachment yet.

 

[Docscurlock]

All of his marriages and been "open marriages" in his mind ever since he married his 1st wife. Would you be OK with your wife going out and cheating on you ... would you consider yourself in an "open marriage" at that point and shrug if off? Could be now that you think it's a cool thing to do because Trump has done it. Didn't know that having to pay off you're "open marriage" lover was part of being in an open marriage.

Why do you keep bringing this up? How does this effect the fact that he has not been impeached until impeached properly?

 

[Docscurlock]

You can't even argue you're defense of a lying, cheating, adulterating con-man ... now you're all OK with "open marriage" because it fits - and you claim to be a follower of God's word, lol. I'm sure you're all for the way ol' Moscow Mitch will handle the "fair trial".

I'm not arguing his "innocence", I am arguing his lack of guilt if that makes you feel better.

 

[Docscurlock]

All of his marriages and been "open marriages" in his mind ever since he married his 1st wife. Would you be OK with your wife going out and cheating on you ... would you consider yourself in an "open marriage" at that point and shrug if off? Could be now that you think it's a cool thing to do because Trump has done it. Didn't know that having to pay off you're "open marriage" lover was part of being in an open marriage.

All of those things are above my pay grade to worry about, I didn't hire him to be my priest, marriage counselor or friend. What do anyone of these things have to do with Ukraine?

 

[Docscurlock]

I'm sure you're all for the way ol' Moscow Mitch will handle the "fair trial".

He can't set up the trial until there is an actual impeachment. We don't know it won't be fair until it is set up. Can we agree that it should be run like the House inquiry?

 

[GT Pony]

I did watch them, did you? Was the Inquiry fair? Until then, no impeachment yet.

Yes I did watch most of the hearings. It was as fair as could be without others coming to testify like they were asked/subpoena to do so.

Why do you keep bringing this up? How does this effect the fact that he has not been impeached until impeached properly?

Because he is impeached. How about a bet? If history does not show that he was impeached on Dec 18, 2019 then I'll delete my M6G account. If history does show that he was impeached on Dec 18, 2019 then you will delete your M6G account. How about it, if you're so sure then put your money on the line.

 

[Docscurlock]

Yes I did watch most of the hearings. It was as fair as could be without others coming to testify like they were asked/subpoena to do so.

​

Deal is a deal, you really think the inquiry was set up fair huh? Really? Ok you said it, I will say he was impeached. He was impeached.
(Do you truly think it was fair? Secret depositions, selective leaks, controlling the line of questioning, no counsel present)
Wait a minute, you just said it was as fair as could be, you tricky guy you.

Because he is impeached. How about a bet? If history does not show that he was impeached on Dec 18, 2019 then I'll delete my M6G account. If history does show that he was impeached on Dec 18, 2019 then you will delete your M6G account. How about it, if you're so sure then put your money on the line.

I would miss you too much

 

[GT Pony]

He can't set up the trial until there is an actual impeachment. We don't know it won't be fair until it is set up. Can we agree that it should be run like the House inquiry?

It should be conducted like the House wanted to conduct their hearing, which Trump stonewalled.

Take the bet if you're so sure he's not been impeached.

 

[GT Pony]

I would miss you too much

Come on ... if you're so sure then you should take the bet. What are you afraid of ... stonewalling now?

 

[Docscurlock]

It should be conducted like the House wanted to conduct their hearing, which Trump stonewalled.

Take the bet if you're so sure he's not been impeached.

So, conducted the way the House conducted their hearing? Ok, some secret depositions in the basement of the Senate that only McConnel can leak, no calling of any witnesses that the Dems ask for, limiting the scope of the dems questioning, limiting the trial to length and pervue that the Majority party set, the majority stopping questions that may go somewhere that the majority doesn't want to go, voting along party lines for every resolution, rule, over ruling the minority party on every point of order and finally a party line vote for acquittal.

You really want to live in that kind of country?

 

[Docscurlock]

Come on ... if you're so sure then you should take the bet. What are you afraid of ... stonewalling now?

No, I just don't want to take your bet. It is entertaining to debate your hypocrisy.

 

[GT Pony]

No, I just don't want to take your bet. It is entertaining to debate your hypocrisy.

You're afraid you'll lose ... wait, I know you'd lose, and so do you. You can always come back as a new member, lol.

 

[Docscurlock]

Yes I did watch most of the hearings. It was as fair as could be without others coming to testify like they were asked/subpoena to do so..

https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/29/schiff-directing-witnesses-not-to-answer-gop-questions/

Sponsored