Will Trump be impeached?

[Docscurlock]

https://www.lawfareblog.com/must-impeachable-offenses-be-violations-criminal-code

Despite what Trump’s supporters say, however, the president can commit an impeachable high crime without violating the federal criminal law. To conclude otherwise would be to ignore the original meaning, purpose and history of the impeachment power; to subvert the constitutional design of a system of checks and balances; and to leave the nation unnecessarily vulnerable to abusive government officials.

https://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Impeachment/

Look under the column entitled "House Action/Charges". Lots of charges that were not defined federal/civil "crimes".
https://history.house.gov/Institution/Impeachment/Impeachment-List/

Did you write all that for me?

Sponsored

 

[GT Pony]

Did you write all that for me?

Read it and try to understand what impeachment is. Don't be trying to make up your own rules until Trump hires you into the SCOTUS and you can change the purpose of impeachment. I'm sure he'd be trilled if that happened.

And watch for that list to be updated to include Trump with an impeachment date of Dec 18, 2019.

 

[Docscurlock]

Well, like pointed out, there is differing opinions even with the scholars. Just read the updated history books, then we'll see (Dec 18, 2019). I've seem more info say he's been impeached than not, and to me the official vote count means he's impeached regardless of what happens after that.

Ask Billy Clinton what he did after impeachment, besides another intern. Nothing, it meant nothing to him. IT was a crock of shit then and it's a crock of shit now. Impeachment by the house (even if it is done right, which it appears it is not) was merely meant to pacify the knuckle dragging far left of the dem party and some of the most rabid members of the public. It appears it has made you happy. It will mean nothing in the end, history will repeat itself, Trump will likely be reelected, the dems will likely lose control of the house for 2 more years, Trump will continue the important job of stacking the courts with conservatives, our Republic will be safe for another generation. The fight will start over again with the election of another dem president in 5 years, they will shove more carp down our throats and the people will wake up again and say WTF. Hopefully by then I will be living in St. Martin and not caring anymore.

 

[GT Pony]

Ask Billy Clinton what he did after impeachment, besides another intern. Nothing, it meant nothing to him. IT was a crock of shit then and it's a crock of shit now. Impeachment by the house (even if it is done right, which it appears it is not) was merely meant to pacify the knuckle dragging far left of the dem party and some of the most rabid members of the public. It appears it has made you happy. It will mean nothing in the end, history will repeat itself, Trump will likely be reelected, the dems will likely lose control of the house for 2 more years, Trump will continue the important job of stacking the courts with conservatives, our Republic will be safe for another generation. The fight will start over again with the election of another dem president in 5 years, they will shove more carp down our throats and the people will wake up again and say WTF. Hopefully by then I will be living in St. Martin and not caring anymore.

Whatever Boomer ... are you done crying now? I'm sure Trump would like to "do a few more" too. Like I said, don't worry because Trumps clan has his back ... even if they have to break their oaths to do it.

 

[Docscurlock]

Read it and try to understand what impeachment is. Don't be trying to make up your own rules until Trump hires you into the SCOTUS and you can change the purpose of impeachment. I'm sure he'd be trilled if that happened.

And watch for that list to be updated to include Trump with an impeachment date of Dec 18, 2019.

By the tone of your remarks, you don't seem to think the impeachment of the President is a somber affair, didn't you get the note from Nancy? I understand if just for your own petty reasons, impeachment of Trump is a great day for you regardless, life will go on, trump will be president, you will still be you, and we most likely will have political stability and a good economy for 5 more years. That's all I want. If a dem president could offer that I would think of voting for them but mostly the left is full of immature child people who cry when they can't have their way and think that they are owed everything that they want.

 

[Docscurlock]

Whatever Boomer ... are you done crying now? I'm sure Trump would like to "do a few more" too.

I am too young to be a boomer, I already explained that to the other child I was debating. I wish I had a few interns, sounds like a cool gig to me.

 

[GT Pony]

By the tone of your remarks, you don't seem to think the impeachment of the President is a somber affair, didn't you get the note from Nancy? I understand if just for your own petty reasons, impeachment of Trump is a great day for you regardless, life will go on, trump will be president, you will still be you, and we most likely will have political stability and a good economy for 5 more years. That's all I want. If a dem president could offer that I would think of voting for them but mostly the left is full of immature child people who cry when they can't have their way and think that they are owed everything that they want.

Sure it's a somber affair ... it's just that you still haven't accepted the process nor have accepted that Trump has been impeached. If you haven't noticed I don't like people who are dishonest and try to use their power to benefit themselves. You should too, but obviously you really don't care what he does because you're brainwashed like a good follower should be. When Clinton was impeached I thought he abused his power too and should have been impeached. Doesn't matter to me if it's a Rep, Dem or Ind. Nobody in out gov't is above the law or should break their oath to operate per and protect the US Constitution. Do you?

 

[GT Pony]

I am too young to be a boomer, I already explained that to the other child I was debating. I wish I had a few interns, sounds like a cool gig to me.

You're not a Boomer and don't have a Twitter account ... shame, lol. Maybe that's one reason you don't understand the founders and the Constitution ... younger people seem to be losing grasp of morals, ethics, etc that it's all based on.

 

[watisthis]

I am too young to be a boomer, I already explained that to the other child I was debating. I wish I had a few interns, sounds like a cool gig to me.

People nowadays use the word boomer to mock people whose attitudes are stereotypically attributed to the baby boomer generation, i.e. close-minded or out of touch. I wouldn't expect you to understand that as you can't even comprehend reading citations. Alas, ok, boomer.

 

[Docscurlock]

Sure it's a somber affair ... it's just that you still haven't accepted the process nor have accepted that Trump has been impeached. If you haven't noticed I don't like people who are dishonest and try to use their power to benefit themselves. You should too, but obviously you really don't care what he does because you're brainwashed like a good follower should be. When Clinton was impeached I thought he abused his power too and should have been impeached. Doesn't matter to me if it's a Rep, Dem or Ind. Nobody in out gov't is above the law or should break their oath to operate per and protect the US Constitution. Do you?

It is not my fault that Nancy the Clown screwed up and forget to send the articles of impeachment to the senate like she was supposed to. She probably told Schiff to do it and he was getting the hair plucked from his nose and forgot. An unfinished impeachment is not an impeachment. I think Clinton did just as I would have done. "Did you get a BJ from your intern in the oval office while being a married man?" Uh- No, no I did not! Why would you impeach a guy over a simple hummer?

 

[Docscurlock]

You're not a Boomer and don't have a Twitter account ... shame, lol. Maybe that's one reason you don't understand the founders and the Constitution ... younger people seem to be losing grasp of morals, ethics, etc that it's all based on.

I have a twitter account now, it has opened up a whole new world of liberal imbeciles for me to make fun of. I already have 2 followers already, I am so proud.

 

[Docscurlock]

People nowadays use the word boomer to mock people whose attitudes are stereotypically attributed to the baby boomer generation, i.e. close-minded or out of touch. I wouldn't expect you to understand that as you can't even comprehend reading citations. Alas, ok, boomer.

I understand reading citations and footnotes just fine, I just try and be a little choosey where I look for info and Wiki whatever is not a reliable source. If you go through the previous posts you will see many uses of citations, footnotes and disclaimers from published material.


"Maybe that's one reason you don't understand the founders and the Constitution ... younger people seem to be losing grasp of morals, ethics, etc that it's all based on. "
Uh, I think GTPONY was talking about you here. I'm not especially young or naive. If my parents were boomers that would make me about _____ years old?

 

[watisthis]

I understand reading citations and footnotes just fine, I just try and be a little choosey where I look for info and Wiki whatever is not a reliable source. If you go through the previous posts you will see many uses of citations, footnotes and disclaimers from published material.


"Maybe that's one reason you don't understand the founders and the Constitution ... younger people seem to be losing grasp of morals, ethics, etc that it's all based on. "
Uh, I think GTPONY was talking about you here. I'm not especially young or naive. If my parents were boomers that would make me about _____ years old?

You literally used wiki citations in a discussion with me, where I then quoted from that same citation where you were wrong then you got upset. I would agree wiki itself is not a reliable source, however, its cited works are mostly based on common facts, I'm sure I could go through and find some that are disputed but that is why we use a mean of common fact and in our case, those citations were law sources. The thing is you either can't comprehend what you read or you just choose not to when it suits your argument and then proceed to tell me how much money you've made, lmao.

Yeah, read into it whatever you want, we already know you make assumptions based off of zero facts why stop now.

 

[GT Pony]

It is not my fault that Nancy the Clown screwed up and forget to send the articles of impeachment to the senate like she was supposed to. She probably told Schiff to do it and he was getting the hair plucked from his nose and forgot. An unfinished impeachment is not an impeachment.

More grasping ... there is no defined time frame when the articles of impeachment need to be given to the Senate for trial. Sorry the impeachment process has been complete - that's phase 1. You'd know that if you'd inoculating the virus.

I think Clinton did just as I would have done. "Did you get a BJ from your intern in the oval office while being a married man?" Uh- No, no I did not! Why would you impeach a guy over a simple hummer?

Guess you'll have to wait until your supreme smartness gets you into the oval office before soliciting hummers.

And people think Clinton and Biden are pervs ... And Trump and his two affairs while married ... oh yeah, that's fine because the does "good things". Sure, go with that filtered thinking.

 

[Weather Man]

Sponsored