Sponsored

Whipple Mega Cooler

OP
OP

Whipple SC

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Jan 7, 2015
Threads
22
Messages
1,710
Reaction score
1,639
Location
Fresno
Vehicle(s)
2015 5.0
Pressure drop data?
Data logs from SCT X4, no cal changes, although there are huge spikes in the factory curve. Note that our calculations show less than 1.5psi drop at 550HP
MAP Compare_Stock_vs_IC.webp
Pre-TB Compare_Stock_vs_IC.webp
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
OP
OP

Whipple SC

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Jan 7, 2015
Threads
22
Messages
1,710
Reaction score
1,639
Location
Fresno
Vehicle(s)
2015 5.0
Ambiant Temp on the temp charts is always a good thing...
Pricing?
Piping?
Black coating option?
86deg F, dual 1hp air movers in front of IC.

$899 for the IC, hoses, clamps. Comes with 2 pre-formed silicone hoses to couple to stock piping.

No cross brace changes and no cutting. Black PC adds $100.
 
OP
OP

Whipple SC

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Jan 7, 2015
Threads
22
Messages
1,710
Reaction score
1,639
Location
Fresno
Vehicle(s)
2015 5.0
Wow... if ive ever seen a cash grab in the aftermarket this has got to be one of the worst. The end tank design is so squared off and tall that even if it has internal diverters to guide airflow upward its a huge waste of material. Input and outlet of this design also forces aftermarket charge pipes and to top it off the amount of air flow it blocks to the rad if anything hinders engine cooling. Just no..
This was developed for one of our very large partners. It was tested in Ford's wind tunnel and in no way varied engine cooling. The tanks do not require diverters with the large surface area and tapered tank. We tested with and without, it was no help.

This was not a cash grab, I think that's absolutely a slap in the face. This was developed for one of our partners, the program still hasn't taken off, therefore we are marketing ourselves. We invested in new fin type, not using Chinese off the shelf fin like many do. We CFD tested, tooled for new stamping and then testing in the real world with real results. We are also the only one that has a 50-state legal EO for our Stage 1, which you may not know, cost money.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

Whipple SC

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Jan 7, 2015
Threads
22
Messages
1,710
Reaction score
1,639
Location
Fresno
Vehicle(s)
2015 5.0
It's only 17 inches tall based on their spec sheet. 20x17.1x3. Literally only .1 inches taller than the levels intercooler (Strange that they have the kit size half an inch larger). I think their photos are just done in a way to make it look taller/bigger than it actually is. In reality all race intercoolers have most of their cooling done towards the bottom of the intercooler.
Levels height:
13340939_1178253368871659_787844138_o_1024x1024.webp

vs Whipple height:
Mustang_EB_R3.jpg

To be honest they are VERY similar.

It does note that it comes with the needed "adapters", so yes it'll need adapters for them to fit.
We didn't purposely make it .1" bigger, that's just where it ended up in our design. We feel confident our designed fin on the cold and hot side is superior to others, although this will be a small variance when surface area is similar.

But, our package is 50-state legal which means the guys in CA don't have to worry about being illegal and or taking the parts off to smog car.
 

Sponsored

Spykexx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2016
Threads
34
Messages
931
Reaction score
389
Location
Quad Cities, IA
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mach 1 VMP Odin, 2025 Mach-E
Haha I didn't mean it in a bad way towards you guys. He said it looked 24-30 inches tall, when it's not even close to that lol.

Just a suggestion [MENTION=13288]Whipple SC[/MENTION], you may want to clarify some of that in the first post. Will make new readers catch on to those questions and not have to ask them over and over.
 

Tucsonturbos

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Threads
13
Messages
148
Reaction score
25
Location
Tucson
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang ecoboost
This was developed for one of our very large partners. It was tested in Ford's wind tunnel and in no way to engine cooling vary. The tanks do not require diverters with the large surface area and tapered tank. We tested with and without, it was no help.

This was not a cash grab, I think that's absolutely a slap in the face. This was developed for one of our partners, the program still hasn't taken off, therefore we are marketing ourselves. We invested in new fin type, not using Chinese off the shelf fin like many do. We CFD tested, tooled for new stamping and then testing in the real world with real results. We are also the only one that has a 50-state legal EO for our Stage 1, which you may not know, cost money.
CFD graph would show a lot about whats going on for equal distribution of airflow and would definately love to see it because the squared nature of the end tanks and inlet/outlet placement baffles me. If you guys managed to equal out the flow through a stamped tank design vs a die cast then i would be amazed, lots of money saved and put use to the full core. Engineering is not my speciality but manufacturing and machining is. Didnt mean to come off as rude but i can be blunt when i type so i apologize.
Sponsored

 
 








Top