The component should’ve been proven before it was marketed, sold and installed.To demonstrate that it can be driven without emitting excess pollution.
Watch out, you're gonna trigger all the libtards in this thread
Yes, it is tax-payer dollars, but it's dollars being spent by those wanting the dispensation to use parts other than OEM. Those wanting special treatment will need to pay for this concession. I would.The component should’ve been proven before it was marketed, sold and installed.
Your example boils down to using tax payers dollars at state vehicle emission testing lanes to determine if company XYZ’s catalyst passes.
If there is no wiggle room in the law, then this is what will happen. People will make their own exhaust and none will have the ability to pass an emissions test.Guess the EPA is gonna ban welders and exhaust piping next? Cause someone might still run catless and just do it themselves. Gotta cover all them angles, if the government wants to run every aspect of our lives, they better seize those next.
USDA, FDA,There's no need for the govt to police manufacturers.
This times million. Only fools think that deregulation of any kind is for their own good or "freedom" - unless they're running the corporations which who the deregulation is for. And everyone else gets the short end of the stick which recently TX residents had a chance to experience... I'll have no doubt they're still believe that deregulation is good because a famous politician told them so.Manufacturing is driven by greed, given the choice manufactures will always chose the path of least resistance to increase the bottom line.
This greed is the exact thing which will police substandard manufacturers. If the consumer knows they'll be tested, then he'll go out of his way to choose a manufacturer which produces a quality product. Substandard products which do not do an effective job will be exposed in short order. Fostering competition is good for the consumer.Manufacturing is driven by greed, given the choice manufactures will always chose the path of least resistance to increase the bottom line.
Greed and substandard manufacturing remind me of the Ford Pinto.This greed is the exact thing which will police substandard manufacturers.
This is not a genuine argument. By these criteria, competition would never be allowed because some form of risk will always exist.Greed and substandard manufacturing remind me of the Ford Pinto.
Competition didn’t do much for the dead or injured consumers who fell victim of the Ford Pinto.
Fostering competition is good but only after safety and health risks are full mitigated.
The government agencies we speak of exist because of violations committed against the consumer.