Sponsored

SCCA CAM-C Thread

TeeLew

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Threads
12
Messages
3,151
Reaction score
2,392
Location
So Cal
First Name
Tim
Vehicle(s)
Honda Odyssey, Toyota Tacoma, 89 GT project, 2020 Magnetic EB HPP w/ 6M
To an extent, yes. Too much and it'll just load the tire too quickly.

I do run a coupler spacer between the main and helper. Eibach SPACER250, and the Hyperco CS100 helper.
Interesting. I wonder what this is telling us? Whatever it is, it's more than just an issue of roll couple.
Sponsored

 

Brian@BMVK

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Threads
7
Messages
957
Reaction score
975
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT - Sold
Interesting. I wonder what this is telling us? Whatever it is, it's more than just an issue of roll couple.
The rear does have fairly good camber gain, so limiting overall squat via spring (to an extent) can keep the contact patch larger/more consistent. It could be that and a combination of how much anti-squat is built into the integral link design.
 

TeeLew

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Threads
12
Messages
3,151
Reaction score
2,392
Location
So Cal
First Name
Tim
Vehicle(s)
Honda Odyssey, Toyota Tacoma, 89 GT project, 2020 Magnetic EB HPP w/ 6M
The rear does have fairly good camber gain, so limiting overall squat via spring (to an extent) can keep the contact patch larger/more consistent. It could be that and a combination of how much anti-squat is built into the integral link design.
Do you know anti-squat numbers? Do they change significantly through the travel? Is bump steer an issue? If it were a strut rear, I could see camber loss in roll as issue, but unless the camber gain is really through the roof, I'd be surprised if that's the issue, specifically because common static settings seem to be relatively high.

It's not a big deal, just more of a curiousity.
 

Brian@BMVK

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Threads
7
Messages
957
Reaction score
975
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT - Sold
Do you know anti-squat numbers? Do they change significantly through the travel? Is bump steer an issue? If it were a strut rear, I could see camber loss in roll as issue, but unless the camber gain is really through the roof, I'd be surprised if that's the issue, specifically because common static settings seem to be relatively high.

It's not a big deal, just more of a curiousity.
There definitely is bump toe. How much of that and anti-squat I am behind on getting plotted...
 
Last edited:

TeeLew

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Threads
12
Messages
3,151
Reaction score
2,392
Location
So Cal
First Name
Tim
Vehicle(s)
Honda Odyssey, Toyota Tacoma, 89 GT project, 2020 Magnetic EB HPP w/ 6M
@boardkat ran a base EB/V6 bar before, which is in the ballpark of what you're looking for. He settled on stock GT PP bar though when it was still an autocross focused car, as have I. 22.2 mm vs the 24 mm you have now. It's still a very significant difference. I know that the base GT bar is 21.7 mm, also. The base EB/V6 is smaller still but I don't remember the size.
20mm is the V6 bar I've found. I'm going to give it a run next time out. In talking with Maier about the Fontana surface, he commented that the grip is low enough you have to basically put a rain setup on the car. Well, this is kind of doing that, although if it were really raining, I'd be unhooked.
 

Sponsored

Dana Pants

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Threads
11
Messages
964
Reaction score
967
Location
Burlington MA
First Name
Dana
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP1
Rain setup you say...Never heard of it.

Rain tires and the rain driving line I am aware of because cars accelerate and stop better than they turn in the rain.
 

TeeLew

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2020
Threads
12
Messages
3,151
Reaction score
2,392
Location
So Cal
First Name
Tim
Vehicle(s)
Honda Odyssey, Toyota Tacoma, 89 GT project, 2020 Magnetic EB HPP w/ 6M
Rain setup you say...Never heard of it.

Rain tires and the rain driving line I am aware of because cars accelerate and stop better than they turn in the rain.
Well, it's a thing.

In the same way driving is biased towards longitudinal grip, the car is biased for it. It's fairly impressive how little braking grip is lost in the wet. Cornering grip goes straight into the toilet, so you soften everything up to slow the tire loading rates (disconnecting both ARB's is common). Drive traction is also limited, so anything you can do to improve hook up on exit is a big deal.

I wasn't fighting drive traction problems, but I was carrying too much speed on entry, sliding wide in the middle & delaying throttle application while I waited for the thing to recover from my stupidity. I ran the exact same speed with the rear bar on & off, I just did it in different ways.
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,722
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
This ^^^

Tire grip (mu) is not only sensitive to how much vertical load it's seeing (a static snapshot in time), there's also some sensitivity to how fast the load transfer is applied (the whole video).

I think the reason for softening the setup in the wet is analogous to when drag racers have to fix a case of "hitting the tires too hard" on launch.


Norm
 

strengthrehab

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Threads
74
Messages
1,181
Reaction score
441
Location
Houston
First Name
Ken
Vehicle(s)
2016 DIB Base GT with PP
Had an event yesterday to warm-up for the Texas National Tour. I scored 3/7 in class losing to two great drivers. I had a quicker run later in the heat, but it was during a double run and was dirty. That run would have been barely in 2nd or barely in 3rd. The guy who won was driving a ZL1 Camaro. My co-driver actually ran about 0.8 seconds quicker with a run that would have won the class, but he was just testing the car to prepare for the tour so not in class.

This was the first event since upping the front spring rate from 325 to 560 (with softening the front bar).

Overall, the car is setup perfectly thanks to @Brian@BMVK.

 

SteveW

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2015
Threads
8
Messages
700
Reaction score
271
Location
Columbia Gorge area
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP
Had an event yesterday to warm-up for the Texas National Tour. I scored 3/7 in class losing to two great drivers. I had a quicker run later in the heat, but it was during a double run and was dirty. That run would have been barely in 2nd or barely in 3rd. The guy who won was driving a ZL1 Camaro. My co-driver actually ran about 0.8 seconds quicker with a run that would have won the class, but he was just testing the car to prepare for the tour so not in class.

This was the first event since upping the front spring rate from 325 to 560 (with softening the front bar).

Overall, the car is setup perfectly thanks to @Brian@BMVK.
The car looks so flat and hooked up! Hope you do great at the Tour!

Brian been meaning to ask if you've tried similar front spring rates on your car yet?
 

Sponsored

strengthrehab

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Threads
74
Messages
1,181
Reaction score
441
Location
Houston
First Name
Ken
Vehicle(s)
2016 DIB Base GT with PP
10 competitiors next weekend. Tied with CS for biggest class.
 

strengthrehab

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Threads
74
Messages
1,181
Reaction score
441
Location
Houston
First Name
Ken
Vehicle(s)
2016 DIB Base GT with PP
Just as an FYI for you folks.

I got word today with Tire Rack and Bridgestone confirmation that the RE71R production has ended without a replacement in the works for the states. The RE71RS is now being produced for the Asian market, but no word on release in the US.
Sponsored

 
 




Top