Possible 350 performance numbers.....

[Trappen]

My guess for 0-60 is slower than light but faster than me.

Sponsored

 

[bpracer]

0-60 in 3.14159265359 seconds

 

[Trappen]

0-60 in 3.14159265359 seconds

Is that there apple pie I smell?

 

[CANTWN4LSN]

Is that there apple pie I smell?

Knew someone would take the bait.:cheers:

 

[Trappen]

The geek is real with me.

 

[mattlqx]

The more likely scenario is that they use published performance figures to tweak the vehicles in the game, but if they're not published, they just guess. Using "like" cars for which they do have numbers, they could come up with rudimentary estimates to program into the game.

Driving the car in the game is actually a little disappointing compared to other models, but perhaps I spent too much time racing Formula Fords in the game.

 

[Hughespj47]

0-60 in 3.14159265359 seconds

Come here and I'll give you a pie to the face!:clap2:

 

[Boss Man]

I'll take a stab/guess.... I hope I'm wrong and it's a bit quicker.

0-60 mph = 3.9 secs
1/4 mile in 11.9 secs

Guessing the same but I don't think it will be any quicker. Needs to be quicker than the new SS.

 

[stanglife]

ATS-V is 464/445 at @3760lbs
0-60 4.0
1/4 12.2

The ATS-V has a broader tq curve, for sure but there's potential for the GT350 to surprise. Wouldn't you crap if it ended up something like 3.7 and 11.7??

 

[derpington]

ATS-V is 464/445 at @3760lbs
0-60 4.0
1/4 12.2

The ATS-V has a broader tq curve, for sure but there's potential for the GT350 to surprise. Wouldn't you crap if it ended up something like 3.7 and 11.7??

I'm probably going to crap at some point, regardless.

 

[wproctor411]

1/4 mile 11.7 sec.
0-60 3.6
top speed 186mph.
my guess, we need a pool

Those could be R times.

 

[Hack]

ATS-V is 464/445 at @3760lbs
0-60 4.0
1/4 12.2

The ATS-V has a broader tq curve, for sure but there's potential for the GT350 to surprise. Wouldn't you crap if it ended up something like 3.7 and 11.7??

I think the GT350 engine and chassis could be capable of faster than 4.0, but the current gearing is not set up for fast 0-60. Right now first tops out in the 50s mph, which means you aren't getting the benefit of no shifts between 0 and 60, and you also aren't getting as much torque multiplication off the line as you could have with steeper gears. I get it; the car is set up for the road course, not for 0-60 times.

With gear and a tire, you could make the car super fast 0-60. You might not even need a tire. Changing the gearing might slow the car down on some road courses, though (more shifting).

 

[65Terdlingua]

I think the GT350 engine and chassis could be capable of faster than 4.0, but the current gearing is not set up for fast 0-60. Right now first tops out in the 50s mph, which means you aren't getting the benefit of no shifts between 0 and 60, and you also aren't getting as much torque multiplication off the line as you could have with steeper gears. I get it; the car is set up for the road course, not for 0-60 times.

With gear and a tire, you could make the car super fast 0-60. You might not even need a tire. Changing the gearing might slow the car down on some road courses, though (more shifting).

A lower gear ratio to allow the car to get to 60 in first would actually mean a little less torque off the line.

 

[ohtobbad]

Those could be R times.

thats what I am getting and would be very happy with those numbers
from an untouched production car:cheers:

 

[Trackaholic]

A lower gear ratio to allow the car to get to 60 in first would actually mean a little less torque off the line.

Since he said it would mean more shifting on the road course, he's talking about a shorter ratio, which would mean more torque multiplication.

-T

Sponsored