Sponsored

Oil Separator Necessity??

badass03ragtop

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Threads
8
Messages
360
Reaction score
56
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT, 2003 GT 'vert, 1973 Fastback
Don't flame me if this has been addressed before. I looked and couldn't find an answer.

Is there a valid reason to put this on a stock car? I mean, is the Coyote that bad?? I didn't ever worry about this before adding forced induction to my cars. There, the pressures developed warranted it. I just don't see it with a stock engine, with low compression, etc. Maybe on an EB because of turbo, but that's it.

Someone please educate me if I'm missing something here.
Sponsored

 

Asharus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Threads
24
Messages
3,508
Reaction score
643
Location
Boca Raton, FL
First Name
Angelo
Vehicle(s)
2018 Challenger Scat Pack
my 2011 wrx that was making over 100 more hp than it was stock didn't need one. a lot of guys ran them though. i thought of it as a fad. but i see guys here running it on their NA GTs. i have no idea why.
 
OP
OP

badass03ragtop

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Threads
8
Messages
360
Reaction score
56
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT, 2003 GT 'vert, 1973 Fastback
my 2011 wrx that was making over 100 more hp than it was stock didn't need one. a lot of guys ran them though. i thought of it as a fad. but i see guys here running it on their NA GTs. i have no idea why.
Exactly my point.. I've modified a lot of engines over the years, and until adding forced induction to me '03, never used one. Those builds include other FI applications as well as high compression motors.
 

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
Don't flame me if this has been addressed before. I looked and couldn't find an answer.

Is there a valid reason to put this on a stock car? I mean, is the Coyote that bad?? I didn't ever worry about this before adding forced induction to my cars. There, the pressures developed warranted it. I just don't see it with a stock engine, with low compression, etc. Maybe on an EB because of turbo, but that's it.

Someone please educate me if I'm missing something here.
The Coyote is really not a low compression factory motor. At least I don't think it is.

I can't answer your question other then the fact when looking at the amount of oil collected after 1500 miles of driving, seems worth it to me.
 
OP
OP

badass03ragtop

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Threads
8
Messages
360
Reaction score
56
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT, 2003 GT 'vert, 1973 Fastback
I've had zero oil loss over 1000 miles.

I've only considered 12:1 and higher to be high compression, so the Coyote's 11:1 is just about there, but not quite...
 

Sponsored

Grimace427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
6,467
Reaction score
1,702
Location
NoVA
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang 5.0
Just pulled the intake manifold from my 2011 Coyote and looking at the intake ports and valves they are spotless after 33,000 miles. I don't think a catch can is necessary.
 

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
Just pulled the intake manifold from my 2011 Coyote and looking at the intake ports and valves they are spotless after 33,000 miles. I don't think a catch can is necessary.
Great to hear!!
 

phunk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Threads
23
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
304
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
'15 GT-PP
I never put catch cans in my cars, no matter what. Just more clutter for the engine bay. They are popular because they are an inexpensive and easy modification.

People get a sense of gratification when they see the oil that has accumulated over time. But the math says that divided up among the 10's of millions of combustion cycles that have taken place over this time, the amount of oil going into the chamber with air/fuel would probably be measured on the molecular level. no supporting data here, just guesstimating.
 

Grimace427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
6,467
Reaction score
1,702
Location
NoVA
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang 5.0

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
We need to help you clean that engine...LOL!!

Thanks for posting pictures. Good to see. Looks like I just saved myself $200 bucks :).
 

Sponsored
OP
OP

badass03ragtop

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Threads
8
Messages
360
Reaction score
56
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT, 2003 GT 'vert, 1973 Fastback
We need to help you clean that engine...LOL!!

Thanks for posting pictures. Good to see. Looks like I just saved myself $200 bucks :).
Thanks for the pics. Not going to spend the money.

BTW, jusdging from your pics, I see you live where sand is a problem also.... Hate that shtuff... Gets into everything.
 

Nataphen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
302
Location
DFW
Vehicle(s)
2013 Mustang GT
Agreed, it's a waste of money. Switched to a Boss IM on my 2013 GT at about 56,000, and the stock IM was totally clean. OCCs aren't necessary for these cars at all when they're NA at least.
 

Budwise

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Threads
31
Messages
625
Reaction score
157
Location
Austin, TX
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP
It depends on the conditions in my opinion. For every person who has pulled their intake and found it squeaky clean there's another who found an oil film on everything.
 

AdrianMAK

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Threads
50
Messages
1,216
Reaction score
326
Location
Miami, FL
Website
www.makperformance.com
Vehicle(s)
2015 TY Mustang GT Premium
 








Top