Sponsored

Is the Ford Performance Track Pack Really Worth It?

Taylor1234

Active Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2018
Threads
5
Messages
41
Reaction score
3
Location
Jacksonville
First Name
Taylor
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
Hey Guys,

So Im starting the build on my 2018 GT PP. Ive had the full blown race cars in the past and dont think I can just tear this thing apart and essentially trash the car. I do, however, want to have a well balanced fun car at the track. This is not my daily driver, but will still drive it on the weekends occasionally. Ive looked at a few different coil over options along with the For Performance Track Handling Package. It seems that this would suit my needs, but I worry that I won’t see much of a difference with this being a PP. Is that the case or is this package actually a good kit? Im not worried about a stiff ride and will be running Hoosier R7’s along with Hawk DTC-70’s or comparable brake pads at the track. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Sponsored

 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
15,010
Reaction score
8,921
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
OP
OP

Taylor1234

Active Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2018
Threads
5
Messages
41
Reaction score
3
Location
Jacksonville
First Name
Taylor
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
I like what he said and can completely appreciate that. Im trying to avoid making the same mistake I made last time which was assuming that since the spring rates are stiffer and that sway bars are thicker, the car will handle better. In the beginning, my Miata was like a skateboard on the track. It had zero body roll, but I couldn’t roll over on to the tires, pre load suspension, or anything. It was fast, until it broke loose. How do you feel your car compares or holds up to others on the track?
 

Bluemustang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2015
Threads
149
Messages
3,897
Reaction score
2,264
Location
Maryland
First Name
Ryan
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Base GT

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
15,010
Reaction score
8,921
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
I like what he said and can completely appreciate that. Im trying to avoid making the same mistake I made last time which was assuming that since the spring rates are stiffer and that sway bars are thicker, the car will handle better. In the beginning, my Miata was like a skateboard on the track. It had zero body roll, but I couldn’t roll over on to the tires, pre load suspension, or anything. It was fast, until it broke loose. How do you feel your car compares or holds up to others on the track?
This doesn't have that problem. It is less than half the stiffness of a lot of the popular, high-dollar coilover options, but still ~50% stiffer than stock (which is quite soft). It lets the tires work, it's not track-only stiff. Breakaway is progressive and smooth, and the stiffness is more than adequate for camber control and transitional response.

It has fared well against those with much stiffer cars. @J.P.B. has a really nice track review.
 

Sponsored

Roadway 5.0

Strassejager
Joined
Dec 19, 2016
Threads
57
Messages
1,483
Reaction score
1,780
Location
New York - USA
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2016GT PP 6MT
Vehicle Showcase
1

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,721
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
The SP083 springs are roughly the same stiffness as GT350R springs, and that car comes with tires that are at least technically "R compound". The resulting wheel rates / suspension frequencies in a 3600+ lb car aren't all that high, nothing I'd consider 'skateboard-y'.


Norm
 
OP
OP

Taylor1234

Active Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2018
Threads
5
Messages
41
Reaction score
3
Location
Jacksonville
First Name
Taylor
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
Thanks for all the responses. This definitely helps to clear things up and points me in the right direction.
 

808muscle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
298
Reaction score
120
Location
Lahaina HI
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Premium Whipple, 2006 GT Blown and cammed
I have the Ford Competition Track shocks and struts kit with BMR performance springs and swaybars. Car handles so much better than stock and with the whipple kit the car doesnt squat on its ass like it did when stock. I have nothing negative to say about any of these mods other than the front swaybar is a bitch to install. LOL
 

Sponsored

TheLion70x77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2019
Threads
7
Messages
170
Reaction score
103
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Performance Package
While I haven't tried the SP083 / FP Track damper combination yet, some food for thought (my next upgrade):

GT350R Track Pack Spring Rates: 240 lbs-in Front, 920 lbs-in Rear, F/R Ratio is 0.261

SP083 Spring Rates: 250 lbs-in Front, 980 lbs-in Rear, F/R Ratio is 0.255

Darn those are close! FP Track Dampers ARE GT350 valving. Pairs ideally with Steeda Bump Steer and Roll Center Correction Kit and either their spherical Tension Link bearings OR their Higher Durometer Tension Link Bushings (which i'm running now). Steeda's extended height ball stud lateral links are set to correct geometry for a 7/8" drop in ride height which is EXACTLY what the ride height drop of the SP083's and Steeda's Comp DR springs.

RC and Bump kit works well with stock PP struts an SP080's that I'm running now. Handling wise, I wouldn't lower my car without corrected geometry unless going to a much stiffer spring, but even then your still sacrificing geometry which optimizes tire contact patch. Case in point, the Ford Performance Track Suspension kit does NOT offer corrected geometry, but did you know GM offers a 1LE suspension Pacakge for 1SS owners? Guess what, they have extended ball stud lateral links in their package! Geometry matters as much as CG, ride frequency or any other aspect.

The ideal Track able Street Suspension setup for GT's:

1. SP083 Springs
2. FP Track Dampers OR Steeda Pro-Action Adjustable Dampers
3. Stock 22mm Performance Pack rear sway bar
4. BMR or any other 35mm 3 hole adjustable front sway bar (allows you to tune roll couple balance)
5. BMR CB05 or CB10 IRS lockout (cheaper than steeda's solution, weighs less and easier to install)
6. Ford Performance Spherical Bearings for outer end of the rear toe link (helps especially with power down traction)
7. MaximumMotorSports Caster / Camber Plates (cheaper than BMR's / Steedas but same specs)
8. Steeda Bump Steer and Roll Center Correction Kit (allows for ideal roll center and bump steer with SP083 or Comp DR springs)
9. Steeda Tension Links with BUSHINGS (higher durometer bushings, but not susceptible to debris like the open bearing), gives more on-center feel, sharper response (especially turn in) and better braking stability
10ish. APR Front Splitter if you do high speed cornering (increased down force will definitely help with traction and making the car feel planted, especially at higher speeds, but you increase drag)
11ish. Full Tilt Boogie Differential Cooler - it's one of only two options (Ford Performance), but half the cost of the FP option and the entire kit weighs only 12 lbs! Thermostat controlled pump. Either that or you run 75W-140 diff oil and some exhaust wraps to keep the diff from over heating which works for most but NOT all.
12ish. Air to Oil Cooler - Depends on how hard you push the car, for extended HPDE and an experienced driver, you probably should add an air to oil cooler. Otherwise follow the manual and just run 5W-30 for track sessions.

I have no issue with people adding RLCA bearings or opting for Spherical Bearings in the Tension Links, but I chose to avoid those changes because both are open bearings and susceptible to high wear rates from road salt, dust and debris. Unlike the Steeda high durometer bushing tension links and lateral link that uses a sealed ball stud. Their bump steer tie rod ends are open, however they do have cleaning wipers build into them unlike the open spherical bearings. I wasn't sure if I could find a proper seal for the open bearings to make them more durable in street use and I also wanted at least one point of compliance to avoid cracking any steel mounting points on hard impacts (aka pot holes).

And I can say this, the stock tension link bushings are SO soft I could literally push the end of the tension link up, down, left and right with two fingers a full 6 inches. So anyone saying the stock bushings binding has any meaningful impact ovbiously hasn't determined how little resistance there actually is in them. The steeda high durometer ones on the other hand required my whole hand to move half the distance, so they do add some bind, however it's still very minor compared to how much force the strut spring generates at ride height. Steering is just a smidge heavier, but I'm also running 275 Pilot Sport 4S tires in front (my 4 square summer setup) where I was running 255 Pilot AS3+ All seasons on stock PP wheels previously (my winter setup).

And I'm still on the soft SP080 springs and PP dampers, but am now running the higher durometer tension links and SB044 front sway bar (stock PP rear bar). The bind is pretty meaningless in the grand scheme of things, it's contributing a fraction of a percent to roll resistance and effective spring rates.

But the quite soft stock bushings do allow for some deflection, even if it's not huge that makes the car feel like it's never quite on center. I also noticed a little bit of road vibration in the floor and steering wheel now with the high durometer tension links (even more would be experienced with the spherical bearings over the bushings). The stock ones isolate any road feedback. The car feels more like my 1997 MX-5 M-edition, which had some pretty stiff springs and bushings stock. That car was very connected with the road and that was one of the trade off's is a little more road noise / refinement. Lastly, I didn't want to mess with pressing out the OE bushings or pay double for the tension links with spherical bearings already in them. But each his own, I have no issue with them, I just thought the higher durometer tension link bushings were better suited to my goals as are the stock RLCA bushings (which are also rubber bushings on the GT350). No need to change parts if I don't have to!

Avoid stiff rear bars, you'll end up with chronic over steer. Also the front roll couple has very little change between spring rates from BMR, so if you decide to try a softer spring setup first with stock struts (or want a little softer ride) and get the front to rear roll couple balance tuned in, stepping up to the SP083's will likely not require any more or less front bar.

Stock PP GT Front Roll Couple: 55.3%. Note that most track cars run around 60% front roll couple. Some a little more, some a little less depending on many other factors. Auto X is more extreme at 70~75% front roll couple (too much push for track)

Front Roll Couple SP080 / PP Strut / BMR 35mm Front Bar / PP 22mm Stock Rear Bar:
Soft BMR Bar Setting: 57.7%
Medium BMR Bar Setting: 59.4%
Stiff BMR Bar Setting: 60.9%

Front Roll Couple SP083 / FP Track Strut / BMR 35mm Front Bar / PP 22mm Stock Rear Bar:
Soft BMR Bar Setting: 57.3%
Medium BMR Bar Setting: 58.6%
Stiff BMR Bar Setting: 59.9%

As you can see, it's very close. See the attached excel sheet.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
OP
OP

Taylor1234

Active Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2018
Threads
5
Messages
41
Reaction score
3
Location
Jacksonville
First Name
Taylor
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
Thank you so much for sharing. I will admit, I got a little lost ready what you wrote, then really lost once I saw your spreadsheet. Very much impressed though and would love to learn as much as I can. I will continue reading over.
 

TheLion70x77

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2019
Threads
7
Messages
170
Reaction score
103
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Performance Package
I know, I post excessively. But I don't like leaving out important details :crackup:. Drives me bonkers :headbang: for some reason, I guess that's why I became an Electrical Engineer, because I"m excessively anal on details and love to tap into the potential of things and create new designs!

Maybe it's 500% overboard, but cars are expensive and complex. I don't like changing things I don't understand and when I do, I like to fully understand the impacts. Hopefully my efforts can help others make more informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes and unintended consequences.
 

Bluemustang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2015
Threads
149
Messages
3,897
Reaction score
2,264
Location
Maryland
First Name
Ryan
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Base GT
I know, I post excessively. But I don't like leaving out important details :crackup:. Drives me bonkers :headbang: for some reason, I guess that's why I became an Electrical Engineer, because I"m excessively anal on details and love to tap into the potential of things and create new designs!

Maybe it's 500% overboard, but cars are expensive and complex. I don't like changing things I don't understand and when I do, I like to fully understand the impacts. Hopefully my efforts can help others make more informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes and unintended consequences.
Dude, I love your analysis above. GREAT. I see this being very helpful to others on the forum. And I 100% agree on avoiding stiff rear sways, you will have bad oversteer. I found that out the hard way.

Are you planning a swap to SP083 or GT350R springs?
Sponsored

 
 




Top