thePill
Camaro5's Most Wanted
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2012
- Threads
- 37
- Messages
- 6,561
- Reaction score
- 699
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Vehicle(s)
- S550
The SS comes standard in 245/275 Run-Flats... Why advertise an optimal front/rear distribution (which isn't truly balanced anyway) when it fails on so many other levels.My point is more weight to the rear is better than in the front...and 50/50 is better than 5X/4X
Clearly L/R ratio matters but most of the time it's not much different between cars...at least not that i've seen. Comparing both is rather pointless and a simple consumer understands front to rear better.
You should read my other post Pill before ya start going on on a tangent
and wtf are you going on about runflats for??
The 20 inch wheels are a joke, it has to be. The 245's in the front aren't winning any races either and, a Run-Flat is not a performance tire period. The wheelbase is almost full size and the wheelbase:track is slightly better than the 2014 Mustang GT. What is a 50/50 weight distribution going to do to help us?
What happens to that distribution when I run on a 1/4 tank of fuel? I need to sit in it too...
Vehicles always have a driver's side bias, no car is balanced so no need to really mention it. Even at 50/50, 70% of your rear 50 is on the driver's side when your driving. That isn't balanced at all...
Sponsored