Sponsored

GT350 Intake Dyno..ENJOY!

Laztug

Wanna run dyno slips bro?
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Threads
25
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
287
Location
COTUS
Vehicle(s)
Calling out OKC #1 spot after axle back install.
[ame]

Intake looks great!
 

Dnasty5.o

New Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2016
Threads
0
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
Miami,FL
Vehicle(s)
2012 Mustang GT
Hey I'm curious to know If this IM and TB setup may work on my 2012 5.0??
 
OP
OP

sandeale

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
356
Reaction score
335
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium PP
Sure would, only thing to keep in mind is that the 2015 intake ports are larger than the 12 (youd have more exposed cylinder head in the runner, not sure how much) and you'd also have to lock the cmcvs open
 

Sponsored

rabbit_eater

This place makes me itch.
Joined
May 13, 2015
Threads
8
Messages
132
Reaction score
74
Location
Redlands, CA
First Name
Colin
Vehicle(s)
Triple Yellow '15 GT PP
I'm sure this was covered elsewhere but I have a question regarding using this manifold. Does this hook up to the factory IMRC controls and still utilize the dual-runner capability of this manifold? If not, it seems there would still be some low-end torque gains left on the table...
 

dev1360

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
672
Reaction score
317
Location
STL
Vehicle(s)
DIB 2016 S550
From my understanding, IMRCs lay flat at WOT. Regardless of RPM
 

rabbit_eater

This place makes me itch.
Joined
May 13, 2015
Threads
8
Messages
132
Reaction score
74
Location
Redlands, CA
First Name
Colin
Vehicle(s)
Triple Yellow '15 GT PP
From my understanding, IMRCs lay flat at WOT. Regardless of RPM
Still my daily-driver so the part-throttle torque is something i'd like to keep. Good point though, didn't consider the dyno graph implications. I had assumed they switch over at a certain rpm.

Those 6,000+ rpm gains are truly impressive though, considering the car didn't have longtubes
 

Sponsored

dev1360

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
672
Reaction score
317
Location
STL
Vehicle(s)
DIB 2016 S550
DD here for me too. I want as much part throttle torque as I can get. And I don't quite have VMP cash lol
 

rabbit_eater

This place makes me itch.
Joined
May 13, 2015
Threads
8
Messages
132
Reaction score
74
Location
Redlands, CA
First Name
Colin
Vehicle(s)
Triple Yellow '15 GT PP
DD here for me too. I want as much part throttle torque as I can get. And I don't quite have VMP cash lol
Hah same man. It's pretty amazing that this manifold showed no losses anywhere in the band, just straight gains where it counts. This is certainly going on my list. I need to be ready for when those '16 Camaro SS's hit the streets! :headbang:
 

mustangflanagan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 22, 2015
Threads
31
Messages
455
Reaction score
62
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2015 mustang gt
Alright first and foremost please excuse my disgusting car, but the dyno was my priority today.

The shop I went to has a notoriously low reading dyno (look at that tq..whew!), but it is a tuning tool, and my baseline and this run were done on the same dyno, using STD correction for both runs so as to keep as much consistency as possible.

What size injectors were recommended

Runfile 4 (baseline):

Steeda Restrictorless intake
X pipe
replaced stock mufflers with magnaflow (stock exhaust pipe)

Runfile 2:

Same as above with addition of GT350 IM and Throttle Body

running a Lund FF tune, but both runs were on 93

Here's the video:

[/URL][/IMG]

Here's the Sheet:

[/URL][/IMG]

Thats a peak to peak gain of 36 whp and a 56 whp gain at my current peak of 7500 rpm (thought I had it set to 7600), you will notice the car still making power so once I up the ante to 7800-8000 rpm the gains will be even more substantial.

You will notice no losses any where but gains across the board of 5-10 hp until 6k, so with that said this car needs longtubes to further utilize this manifold.........anyone want to donate or possibly sponsor a set (catted, as I do have emissions testing yearly here) so we can continue this research project...let's get this going...lol

All previous photos relating to this manifold are located at

http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39204&page=6


Some Installation notes:

[/URL][/IMG]

The Red Circle is showing the Changes made to the hose that comes stock on the GT350 manifold, it has to be lengthened and I added a 90 to help it sit more square with the port on the CAI.

The yellow circle is showing the new vacuum feed for the Brakes, instead of going into that cluster on the stock manifold, you need to connect the vacuum feed for the brake booster directly to the manifold port

The blue square is showing the purge valve wiring, I just undid the harness and pulled as much wiring as possible to ease the tension.

The orange square towards the back is showing the CMCV solenoid connectors, upon manifold removal you will see the harness that attached to the back of the manifold originally, and notice that these wires exit the harness on the drivers side, again I undid the harness wrap and pulled the wiring back over to the passenger side again to ease tension on the wiring.

What I forgot to highlight was on the bottom of the CAI tube where a vacuum connection exists for the stock manifold, this is no longer needed with the gt350 so I just pulled the connector out and plugged the port on the intake tube.
What size injectors were recommended
 
OP
OP

sandeale

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
356
Reaction score
335
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium PP
Still up 8n the air but typically 47lb are the recommended injector for n/a
 

S550bluegt

Active Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2015
Threads
2
Messages
37
Reaction score
8
Location
Toronto, Ontario
First Name
Anthony
Vehicle(s)
2015 mustang gt perf pkg m6
Hey I'm curious to know If this IM and TB setup may work on my 2012 5.0??
Considering there is more clearance above the engine in the 2011-2014 models as well as the majority of engine changes are internal I would assume it would fit just as well and function. Physically the heads are the same the only differences are port size (minimal) and cams, which give more valve lift than 2011-14 models. My 2 cents.
Sponsored

 
 








Top