Sponsored

GT350 Intake Dyno..ENJOY!

OP
OP

sandeale

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
356
Reaction score
335
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium PP
The 5 to 8 ish hp/tq difference between the two runs in the bottom end I attribute to the dyno fudge factor....start to finish these runs were pretty much dead even

And it's possible that a full blown dyno tune could eek out a couple more for each setup but I'm positive the result would remain the same...the 5.0 motor doesn't need the 87mm tb...i would imagine a majority of the gains made from the PP2 package as tested by LMR is from the CAI and tune....Ford may even turn up the wick a little more in the tune to ensure the PP2 has a clear advantage over the PP1.....

Thinking about the PP2 from a business standpoint.....why redesign a new intake system for the gt when a ready made kit is already manufactured in house....but wait the TB end is larger, lets capitalize on that by pairing the correct size TB (also in house) for the CAI and charge even more......sorry im just playing devils advocate
Sponsored

 
OP
OP

sandeale

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
356
Reaction score
335
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium PP
That's a lot smaller than it looks...9 lb/ft and again a toss up because it disappears shortly after....at 4500 the stock TB produces the same size bump over the 350
 

GSLSE20B

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
1,005
Reaction score
289
Location
Fair Oaks , Ca
Vehicle(s)
16 SHADOW BLACK GTPP
At full load the gt350 is making more torque than stock below 3k , the only thing that would keep it from holding that lead when higher flow comes into the picture is loss of load at the upper rpm . Cam timing needs to be adjusted for the extra flow .
 

Gibbo205

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2015
Threads
156
Messages
6,673
Reaction score
2,217
Location
UK
Vehicle(s)
UK 2015 Mustang & BMW E46 M3
At full load the gt350 is making more torque than stock below 3k , the only thing that would keep it from holding that lead when higher flow comes into the picture is loss of load at the upper rpm . Cam timing needs to be adjusted for the extra flow .

My GT 350 IM, TB and CAI are due to be delivered next week, so I hope to get on the dyno to compare:

GT IM, GT TB, PMAS CAI vs GT 350 IM, GT 350 TB, GT 350 CAI, both setups tuned by Lund. :)

Cannot wait.
 

Sponsored

angermgmt14

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Threads
42
Messages
1,258
Reaction score
367
Location
Massachusetts
First Name
Dave
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Premium--Oxford White--A6
My GT 350 IM, TB and CAI are due to be delivered next week, so I hope to get on the dyno to compare:

GT IM, GT TB, PMAS CAI vs GT 350 IM, GT 350 TB, GT 350 CAI, both setups tuned by Lund. :)

Cannot wait.
Sub'd
 

bunk22

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Threads
11
Messages
116
Reaction score
29
Location
San Antonio
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium Auto
Lots of good stuff in this thread. I ordered my GT350 IM and tb spacer today. Now I have the six-speed auto premium package, 3.55 gears with a JLT, 1 3/4" long-tubes and off-road x-pipe. My local tuner is very good and seemingly keeps up with the latest tuning and he has tuned about a half-dozen 350 IM cars......HOWEVER, all manual. I dont want surging or a noticeable loss of low end tq; also doing the E85. We shall see what happens.
 

Lonmon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Threads
17
Messages
716
Reaction score
275
Location
Mid East US
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT 10spd Base
I have to agree that the gt350tb does have better throttle response. I don't even miss my pedal max at all. I also agree that any power gain or loss is pretty well a toss up until cams are introduced. Other then some initial cold start issues with it, for the money the gt350tb is worth putting on if you plan to upgrade further IMO.
 

Thoriniv

Active Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
26
Reaction score
7
Location
Fort Worth , TX
Vehicle(s)
2015 Magnetic GT
I've been driving my setup for a few weeks now with the GT350 IM , e85 race tune from Lund, LT Pypes 1 7/8" off road headers, mbrp cat back, Steeda CAI.

I am absolutely loving this setup so far but am at a loss for which decision to make regarding injectors and the 350 TB

Quite a few people here with this setup and e85 have 47lb injectors versus our stock 39 lb hr. I see this quite often actually and now Lund is telling me that isn't at all necessary.

If the stock injectors don't lean out all the way up to 7800+ rpm then why do people switch to the 47s?

Also would switching from the stock TB to the gt350 really provide that much more throttle response. If so, how?

Thanks
 

4V Mayhem

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
1,368
Reaction score
529
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium M6
I've been driving my setup for a few weeks now with the GT350 IM , e85 race tune from Lund, LT Pypes 1 7/8" off road headers, mbrp cat back, Steeda CAI.

I am absolutely loving this setup so far but am at a loss for which decision to make regarding injectors and the 350 TB

Quite a few people here with this setup and e85 have 47lb injectors versus our stock 39 lb hr. I see this quite often actually and now Lund is telling me that isn't at all necessary.

If the stock injectors don't lean out all the way up to 7800+ rpm then why do people switch to the 47s?

Also would switching from the stock TB to the gt350 really provide that much more throttle response. If so, how?

Thanks
I'm still wondering myself about the TB. I questioned it because of the difference the stock TB made over the GT350. But then the tune with the GT350 TB was questioned by others. So for now I don't think there is an answer one way or another. Although common sense would tell me that tuned properly, the GT350 TB should be better even if the difference is small.

As for the 47 # injectors. I think the stock injectors are fine if you do either LTs or the IM. But once you do both (LTs AND IM), I think that is when you want to upgrade. Because I don't think the stockers can handle that kind of power especially if you're gonna be shifting in the mid to high 7000 RPM range. Right now I have the stockers with the GT350 IM and TB and I shift at 7500.
 

Sponsored

Thoriniv

Active Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
26
Reaction score
7
Location
Fort Worth , TX
Vehicle(s)
2015 Magnetic GT
But once you do both (LTs AND IM), I think that is when you want to upgrade. Because I don't think the stockers can handle that kind of power especially if you're gonna be shifting in the mid to high 7000 RPM range. Right now I have the stockers with the GT350 IM and TB and I shift at 7500.
That's where I'm confused though as well, I have catless LTs and the 350 IM and even then Lund is saying going out and getting the 47s is a waste on this car and setup. Even from professionals there are so many varied points of view on pretty major components of any motor.

I did find a set of 47s for half price, so at least I have that going for me .
 

Dominant1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2016
Threads
94
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
1,128
Location
USA
First Name
Dr Frankenstang
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt/cs auto 3:55 gears
Vehicle Showcase
1
I did 47 lb injectors to leave open the possibility of going e-85 later!
 

4V Mayhem

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
1,368
Reaction score
529
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium M6
That's where I'm confused though as well, I have catless LTs and the 350 IM and even then Lund is saying going out and getting the 47s is a waste on this car and setup. Even from professionals there are so many varied points of view on pretty major components of any motor.

I did find a set of 47s for half price, so at least I have that going for me .
Yea it seems to me that there are too many different POVs even among the "experts". And it even seems that they say one thing to one customer and then another thing to another customer. I know a few people who are tuned by Lund and they were told to go with 47s after LTs and the IM...smh. And then a few others, like yourself, were told the opposite. I think the problem is that these cars are still pretty new and not everyone is fully well versed in tuning them. Perhaps the tuners out there weren't as capable as they are now and so now they can tune it properly with the stock injectors. Maybe up until recently they were recommending the 47s as a precaution or something. Who knows. But it's getting a bit frustrating and confusing not being able to get consistent answers.
 

GSLSE20B

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
1,005
Reaction score
289
Location
Fair Oaks , Ca
Vehicle(s)
16 SHADOW BLACK GTPP
With my LTH ,gt350 IM and TB , my injectors couldnt hold .85 . I was hitting .90+ . 100% DC . With the LU47s I'm at about 50% DC max at 8k on e85 .
Sponsored

 
 








Top