sandeale
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2015
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 356
- Reaction score
- 335
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 GT Premium PP
- Thread starter
- #676
The 5 to 8 ish hp/tq difference between the two runs in the bottom end I attribute to the dyno fudge factor....start to finish these runs were pretty much dead even
And it's possible that a full blown dyno tune could eek out a couple more for each setup but I'm positive the result would remain the same...the 5.0 motor doesn't need the 87mm tb...i would imagine a majority of the gains made from the PP2 package as tested by LMR is from the CAI and tune....Ford may even turn up the wick a little more in the tune to ensure the PP2 has a clear advantage over the PP1.....
Thinking about the PP2 from a business standpoint.....why redesign a new intake system for the gt when a ready made kit is already manufactured in house....but wait the TB end is larger, lets capitalize on that by pairing the correct size TB (also in house) for the CAI and charge even more......sorry im just playing devils advocate
And it's possible that a full blown dyno tune could eek out a couple more for each setup but I'm positive the result would remain the same...the 5.0 motor doesn't need the 87mm tb...i would imagine a majority of the gains made from the PP2 package as tested by LMR is from the CAI and tune....Ford may even turn up the wick a little more in the tune to ensure the PP2 has a clear advantage over the PP1.....
Thinking about the PP2 from a business standpoint.....why redesign a new intake system for the gt when a ready made kit is already manufactured in house....but wait the TB end is larger, lets capitalize on that by pairing the correct size TB (also in house) for the CAI and charge even more......sorry im just playing devils advocate
Sponsored