Jdenkevitz
Well-Known Member
He's cherry picking statistics to support his position in the most favorable light. Its somewhat disingenuous, but people do it all time. One could just as easily do the opposite and pickYou are comparing an EB automatic Mustang in which that article was written in 2014 (most likely preproduction and supplied by Ford) to an Edmunds long term road test manual GT in which they couldn't control wheel spin?
Show me some consistent reviews of the EB getting a 5.2 0-60, not just one test. I guarantee I can show plenty of reviews with GTs getting mid 4s.
GT: 4.3 0-60 (Car and Driver)
EB: 6.3 0-60 (Motor Trend)
Which would be a 2 second difference.
I can only speak from my own experience having owned both vehicles. The EB was quick, but the GT is fast. The EB suffers from a horrible stock IC and its motor falls on its face above 4500-5000 rpm. There is literally nothing from 5000 rpm to redline in the factory tune.
The GT feels considerably quicker and can really push you back into your seat. A buddy who drives a 911 drove both my mustangs and agreed. While the EB is more nimble going into corners, the GT is much faster.
Sponsored