Hack
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
- Threads
- 86
- Messages
- 12,855
- Reaction score
- 8,274
- Location
- Minneapolis
- Vehicle(s)
- Mustang, Challenger
I think I was being a little hard on the WRX. They aren't all bad and I like the styling. But I also don't think they are great/better than the Mustang unless the criteria is mostly around snow and ice driving.My mistake - C/D tested the latest generation WRX at 0.95 lat-g with moderate understeer (a bit more than I prefer, FWIW).
Not too shabby for a car that can pass for a family sedan if your family is 4 or fewer.
Norm
However, I have to say I'm surprised at the 0.95 G figure. I read the C/D info. I didn't realize the WRX came with such a stiff suspension that "car guys"at C/D would complain about it. I'm also surprised the WRX would come with summer only tires required to reach 0.95 Gs.
I had the WRX pegged as a more practical daily driver kind of car, but I guess most Mustangs are actually more practical than the WRX. Most Mustangs have relatively soft suspension and all season tires.
Sponsored