68fbjjz109
Well-Known Member
At Ford there was was a 6 month requirement for tooling being paid off. If your doing a material change that requires new tools, it needed to pay for itself in 6 months.i really like the enthusiasm from everybody here, but with all the upgrades, do you really expect the mustang to remain at such a competetive price tag?
Lets just assume that the following is coming true, or at least most of it:
10-speed automatic
direct injection
front bumper
rear bumper
headlights
taillights
rear spoiler
hood
wheel options
quad exhaust
power increase
magnetic ride
i cannot image that those features will keep the mustang a well priced car.
Most of the changes being discussed either already exists, like magneride; is a long forecasted fuel economy enabler like the 10 spd; or is accounted for in the business case for the mid cycle action, like hood, fenders, taillights. That was probably easier to justify with how successful the S550 was.
I imagine power improvementsupply are forecasted against fuel economy requirements as well. If the exhaust ships to the pants the same, and can deck in a similar fashion, it's just the technical cost.
There is also cost reduction. Ford won't disclose this but I am sure a Job 1 2015, and a Job 4 2017 have alot of differences. I am sure certain parts have been changed to reduce program costs.
Sponsored