Sponsored

2016 Miata

Tim Hilliard

Happy Owner
Banned
Joined
May 18, 2014
Threads
83
Messages
2,352
Reaction score
257
Location
Boston
Vehicle(s)
'15 Guard 300A PP Recaro
I. am. so. confused. When did DD get back together?
Sponsored

 

OppoLock

RWD Addict
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Threads
43
Messages
3,093
Reaction score
871
Location
St. Petersburg, FL
First Name
Sean
Vehicle(s)
'15 GT, '20 GT350
Vehicle Showcase
1
I feel like i've seen those taillights before
The C-pillar back (save for the actual rear valance) is like a cute baby F-Type. Even the taillights look like the little adolescent version of something that would grow up to look like the Jag's.
 

Sponsored

Tony Alonso

Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Threads
177
Messages
4,257
Reaction score
1,522
Location
Cincinnati, OH USA
Vehicle(s)
'01/'09/'19 Bullitt, '90 GT, '00 Corvette FRC
Looks like Ford might want to talk to Mazda about loosing weight.
Pretty sure if they shrunk it down, made it a 2-seat roadster, and lost the V8 they could get a similar weight :)
 

Sponsored

allgripnoslip

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Threads
2
Messages
65
Reaction score
9
Location
Ca
Vehicle(s)
'15 GT PP
2200lbs, Mazda, you know just what I like. I hope this comes out soon.

Anyone hear any engine specs?
 

HGFireHazard

Mustang Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
442
Reaction score
44
Location
Oklahoma
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Premium PP
Pretty sure if they shrunk it down, made it a 2-seat roadster, and lost the V8 they could get a similar weight :)
As reported by Jalopnik, the 3rd gen weighed 2,447 pounds and the new car is somewhere in the realm of 2,200 pounds.

Mazda is claiming they lost over 220 pounds from a 2,400 pound car.

How can anyone see something like this and not think that Ford failed miserably on the 2015 in this regard?
 

Tony Alonso

Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Threads
177
Messages
4,257
Reaction score
1,522
Location
Cincinnati, OH USA
Vehicle(s)
'01/'09/'19 Bullitt, '90 GT, '00 Corvette FRC
As reported by Jalopnik, the 3rd gen weighed 2,447 pounds and the new car is somewhere in the realm of 2,200 pounds.

Mazda is claiming they lost over 220 pounds from a 2,400 pound car.

How can anyone see something like this and not think that Ford failed miserably on the 2015 in this regard?
The 220lb reduction, from what little I've seen, comes from shrinking the car down in its structural bones.

The wheelbase on the Mustang stayed the same. The GT is the one that mainly went up in weight, and even that amount was within the realm of what it gained over the years of the S197 (although I also wish it went down). If the S550 dropped the 6 inches it got from the SN-95 Mustangs, it also would have dropped weight.

I don't think Ford failed. I think the expectations about weight loss weren't managed in the most straightfoward way. This car's dimensions changed over time because of the styling. This is only my opinion, but I believe the new structure essentially had a major update in the front, in the top, and the rear floor area of the suspension and trunk, leaving the S197 floorpan area essentially intact, although there are likely changes to support the A-pillar moving back if you believe what has been shared in recent interviews with Ford people. I know other will debate if that is a "new platform" or not, but that's not my point here.

This approach was not unlike what happened when the Fairmont platform turned into the FOX-4 platform to go from the Foxbody to SN-95 Mustang. It gained weight, but it also gained strength. They retained the floor plan as part of doing an update on a budget. I recognize that my opinion is an oversimiplification, but unless they were going to change the wheelbase, I had generally thought there would be a small-to-no amount of weight loss on this new car. My hope was 100lbs across the board in eery model.

You might term it "failed", but I term it "making design and engineeering choices while balancing the constraints of safety, cost, and future high horsepower engine applications". Miata plays in a different space.
 

HGFireHazard

Mustang Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
442
Reaction score
44
Location
Oklahoma
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Premium PP
The 220lb reduction, from what little I've seen, comes from shrinking the car down in its structural bones.

The wheelbase on the Mustang stayed the same. The GT is the one that mainly went up in weight, and even that amount was within the realm of what it gained over the years of the S197 (although I also wish it went down). If the S550 dropped the 6 inches it got from the SN-95 Mustangs, it also would have dropped weight.

I don't think Ford failed. I think the expectations about weight loss weren't managed in the most straightfoward way. This car's dimensions changed over time because of the styling. This is only my opinion, but I believe the new structure essentially had a major update in the front, in the top, and the rear floor area of the suspension and trunk, leaving the S197 floorpan area essentially intact, although there are likely changes to support the A-pillar moving back if you believe what has been shared in recent interviews with Ford people. I know other will debate if that is a "new platform" or not, but that's not my point here.

This approach was not unlike what happened when the Fairmont platform turned into the FOX-4 platform to go from the Foxbody to SN-95 Mustang. It gained weight, but it also gained strength. They retained the floor plan as part of doing an update on a budget. I recognize that my opinion is an oversimiplification, but unless they were going to change the wheelbase, I had generally thought there would be a small-to-no amount of weight loss on this new car. My hope was 100lbs across the board in eery model.

You might term it "failed", but I term it "making design and engineeering choices while balancing the constraints of safety, cost, and future high horsepower engine applications". Miata plays in a different space.
You make some good points, thanks for the even tempered response.

I use the term failed because of what other manufacturers (including Ford themselves) are doing to new vehicles at the same time period. I only use the Miata as a comparison because of the sheer amount of weight it lost. That's something like a 9% decrease. If the 2015 lost that over the S197... well we can all imagine that world.

If you read a lot of the common complaints in general you'll see weight, size, and now even mileage. If Ford could have trimmed 100 pounds it would have most likely come from a slight downsizing, which would have also helped the other categories. A 2015 that lost even just a few inches in length and 100 pounds in all forms would almost certainly have matched the EPA numbers of the outgoing model (even though we know what's on the sticker isn't official, but it probably is). I could go on but I think you get the point.
Sponsored

 
 








Top