- Banned
- #31
I'm also waiting on Camaro6, rather than jump the gun I will weigh the many options (15' Camaro/Challenger/Mustang ) available next year and see what's best for me. As of now I think I would prefer the Ecoboost to the GT.
Sponsored
Im just waiting to see what Chevy does in a few months...Im not really in a hurry ;)I just ticked over 100 miles on my new GT PP after trading in my '14 GT500, took it for a nice cruise down along the beach through Ft. Walton Beach and Destin. Good mix of city and highway driving. Aside from torque and power, which the Shelby had in spades, this car beats the GT500 like a rented mule. Nicer interior, better handling, better ride quality, better FEEL when driving.
JMO, but everyone arguing about magazine stats without ever having driven the new car need to stop arguing and and schedule a test drive ASAP.
Then you're missing out. The new car drives and handles like a dream. It's a night and day difference between the new car and the previous model.
i have to say i drove a black mustang gt and it was a blast!!that car got up to 160 really quick.having driven alot of cars,i can say the camaro dont have shit on the new mustang.i could care less about what that gm guy randy says.he does whatever he can to let the camaro win in his test.:lol:I just ticked over 100 miles on my new GT PP after trading in my '14 GT500, took it for a nice cruise down along the beach through Ft. Walton Beach and Destin. Good mix of city and highway driving. Aside from torque and power, which the Shelby had in spades, this car beats the GT500 like a rented mule. Nicer interior, better handling, better ride quality, better FEEL when driving.
JMO, but everyone arguing about magazine stats without ever having driven the new car need to stop arguing and and schedule a test drive ASAP.
Then you're missing out. The new car drives and handles like a dream. It's a night and day difference between the new car and the previous model.
Because I would enjoy having an adult conversation about comparing similarly priced, equipped, and purposed cars. There is already a thread for people who want to wonder in endless circles comparing a street car vs. a track car or a car that is not here yet.Then why start this thread?:shrug:
For the difference in price alone you could have baddest tire rim combination for track use. And tires mean everything in racing/track driving. Why does almost every race series use spec tires? Because tires make the cars more evenly matched than any other single variable yes even more than engine power. Tires can easily account for the difference in lap times.
These two quotes from the wandering-in-endless-circles GTPP vs 1LE thread summarizes the waste of time that it is very nicely.Yes. ^ This just needs to be put in the first post and as a disclaimer in the video. Then this whole thread (GT PP vs 1LE) can finally shut down.
We can summarize this entire discussion which just keeps running in circles:
1) tire size and compounds are not comparable; the 1LE has a clear advantage here
2) the PP is a comprehensive package that's awesome for street use and is a great starting platform for track use
3) the price difference between two comparable trim level cars specced with their performance/track package will always leave a few thousand spare dollars in the Mustang owner's wallet
4) the areas where the GT PP falls short are some of the most easily remedied when it comes to aftermarket modification
5) the S550's interior is in an entirely different league compared to the SS's, and that's not something that can be easily modified by the owners...
I was really impressed with the additional 4.53 sec gain that was realized from stiffening up the suspension, while still leaving it "comfortable and capable" for street use. This is without a doubt what is required on the 2015 GT to make it a successful track first but streetable car like it's competition, and the parts are all available right off the Ford shelf.While I've already posted this elsewhere, I believe it's pertinent to this thread:
On their 2011 Mustang GT, with no other modifications, StangTV decreased their lap times significantly -- 2.25 seconds -- by upgrading their stock 235-section Pirelli tires to 275-section Nittos all the way around.
http://www.stangtv.com/tech-stories...ing-thoroughly-testing-frpps-s197-suspension/
The 1LE features 285's all the way around; up front, that's a total of 60mm (almost 2.5") extra contact patch, tire on pavement, when compared to the GT PP's 255's. Out back, the difference, while not as significant as the delta up front, is 20mm total (almost an inch).
So don't compare the best of what each has to offer in a certain price range?I think it's easy to say he wants what the majority of the public will drive vs what the majority of the public will drive... and then to compare the cars in that fashion.
I'm not saying you can't compare and he's probably saying the same. If the target audience is different for each car, then comparing them based off pure track capabilities might be jumping the gun.So don't compare the best of what each has to offer in a certain price range?
So by that logic, why not compare a fully loaded GT vert against a Z28 if they were in a couple grand of each other?So don't compare the best of what each has to offer in a certain price range?
What happened to the red Zl1? Just wore out the tires that much or what?Come to Texas. Lots of Camaros at the track. And we invite the Mustangs, Corvettes and Mercedes out to have fun too. Pics from this past Saturday.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/128352468@N04/