KingMatt24
Well-Known Member
I see what youâre saying, but I just donât see it as a bad thing for the Mustang brand like so many people.Because Ford named it a mustang and perverted the purpose of the car and set (false) expectations.
The person who allowed not-a-mustang to be called one needs to be hanged from a pole, not just fired.
This thing isn't legal in any race class so it's stupid to build it and mouth the words "racing" in the description.
On the other hand this perverts the Ford halo car concept and cheapens the GT by supplanting it with a mass produced successor. I'm sure every one is already sold, there are plenty of people in the world to whom 300G is like buying cat food.
Had Ford cut the price to be 120k or so to give the c8 z06 a run for it's money, that would have been something even the everyman could cheer about.
That Ford management learns surprising lessons taking a ev f150 out on a trip is a testament to how clueless and out of touch they are.
What Ford fails to realise is that the tweed cap set isn't the ones keeping the lights on. When your product execution is shite rah rah the troops/fanboys doesn't prevent them from buying a different brand of car.
Execution is the ONLY metric that matters.
Everyone is complaining and saying âWhy would I buy a $300K Mustang when you can get a Lambo, Porscheâ etc for that price. I mean, if I had $300K for a car I wouldnât buy a Ford either but just the fact this thing exists is what I think is cool.
Shopping for $300K+ cars doesnât really apply to any of us, so having these hypothetical arguments over which car makes more sense for that price is hilarious.
This car wasnât necessary but itâs one of those things where itâs just cool that Ford was actually crazy enough to go through with this
Sponsored