Armen
Well-Known Member
Here in Ontario, I use Shell 91. I'm not sure about other areas, but here it contains no ethanol. When I've stored my cars, I always use this fuel. No stabilizer. No issues, ever.
Sponsored
You must not know much about motors with that statement. Try putting 87 octane in a 14.1 compression NA motor and see what happens :frusty:The difference between 87 and 93 isn't very significant when you're talking about an NA motor.
Well Ford says you can. And they build the motors.;)Not that I'm comparing the stock Coyote motor to that, but your statement is vague and partially incorrect. On a stock motor with moderate compression the difference between 87 and 93 *may* be insignificant...but just because a motor is NA doesn't mean it can run 87 just as well as 93.
I never even thought of this. After I went through the first tank of gas from dealership I put 91 one in (in Cali... I had no idea 93 was common place elsewhere). I had to go back to the dealership when that tank was done and they filled it up for me but I knew they were putting 87 in and I could certainly feel the difference. Maybe it was a shitty batch of 87 or from a cheapo gas station. I guess I will try another tank of 87 and see if I notice any difference but the price difference really isn't that big of a deal, even looking at year end figures.The difference between 87 and 93 isn't very significant when you're talking about an NA motor. Stick to tier 1 gas stations and I bet you won't notice one iota of difference. If you get a bad batch of 87 your ECU will sense more knock and pull some timing which will in turn reduce available power but unless you're running a forced induction with a 93 tune, you don't need it.
Which is odd considering that CA is such a nasty state to deal with when concerning emissions. You'd think they would regulate more consistent fuel mixtures.I never even thought of this. After I went through the first tank of gas from dealership I put 91 one in (in Cali... I had no idea 93 was common place elsewhere). I had to go back to the dealership when that tank was done and they filled it up for me but I knew they were putting 87 in and I could certainly feel the difference. Maybe it was a shitty batch of 87 or from a cheapo gas station. I guess I will try another tank of 87 and see if I notice any difference but the price difference really isn't that big of a deal, even looking at year end figures.
bama did a dyno with 87 and 93 i think.Which is odd considering that CA is such a nasty state to deal with when concerning emissions. You'd think they would regulate more consistent fuel mixtures.
I've run a few tanks of 87 from my local Tier 1 stations and haven't noticed a difference in my butt dyno. I'm sure someone, somewhere, has done actual dyno testing to see differences between octane ratings but there are so many variables associated with such a test that it may be difficult to detect what the source of any differences are.
Are there graphs of this? I'm really curious as to the results!bama did a dyno with 87 and 93 i think.
Are you just using the preloaded tune?As per the owner's manual, use 93 for towing..... It says 87 octane otherwise. I have a SCT on mine, so I run 93. It does have a 87 octane feature in the SCT, maybe I'll give that a try.