treefiddysnek
Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2019
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 4
- Location
- Southeastern USA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 GT350R
- Thread starter
- #16
Nope, there was nothing.Were your exhaust tips coated with excessive sooting?
I'm not sure that 18+ owners have had their cars long enough to suggest that the 18+ engines are more reliable than previous models, and I haven't seen anything from Ford suggesting your claim. If your claim is accurate then I would expect there to be a major recall on all pre-2018 models, and it would definitely warrant the "ticking time bomb threads" that you mentioned, since that's exactly what pre-2018 models would be in this case. I didn't create this thread to bash Ford, but rather to make the mustang community aware that another voodoo engine has bitten the dust. You can put your fingers in your ears and close your eyes if you'd like, but the truth is no car manufacturer is perfect - mistakes will always be made and there will almost always be manufacturing defects with some cars.Pre 2018 350 engines had a lot more problems than 18+. It's unfortunate for you but a lot of people have also had 0 issues with their engines so we don't need another Ford is making cars that are ticking time bombs thread. You may come out with an upgraded 19+ engine with the upgrades from the 500 development so it may not all be bad.
Would you rather have people that have to have their engines replaced due to oil consumption not tell anyone? Are you sure that you aren't an undercover Ford employee?I just hate to see posts about oil consumption bc soo many people on here will start a Ford bashing and it takes away from people who may be on the fence about the car with blanket statements.
I agree with this. It seems highly unlikely that Ford would invest so much into an engine that was broken by design. I speculate that a decent portion of the oil consumption issues arise from manufacturing defects (like you mentioned) due to suboptimal quality control.I don't think there's ever been a defect in design of the Voodoo engine that results in oil consumption.
I'm glad to hear your Shelby is running much better with the new engine. I hope that I get the same result with my replacement. I'm not really concerned with numbers matching, although it does suck that the engine replacement could potentially lower the value of the car. I plan to keep the car forever though and put well over 150k+ miles on it, so the value I'm concerned about most is the enjoyment I get haha. Maybe I can get Ford to throw in a free 100k mile warranty with the new engineLook at it this way.....I did.....you get a 2019R motor, with all the upgrades. Mine (2018) was at 1 quart per 125 miles when it was replaced at 5K miles. The new motor has over 10K on it and uses about 1 quart per 3000 miles. The new motor will NOT be numbers matching, if that's a thing with you.....good luck. Ford does not and will not stamp the new motor with the older motor number.

Sponsored
Last edited: