DrumReaper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2015
- Threads
- 114
- Messages
- 4,985
- Reaction score
- 3,706
- Location
- South East
- Vehicle(s)
- 1971 429CJ Mach 1, 2012 Boss 302
- Thread starter
- #31
Yeah, I agree with 95% of that. It’s sort of like the old adage about boats... buy a boat according to what you’re gonna do with it 80% of the time.My cynical self can’t help but to say - I wouldn’t expect anyone on the Ford payroll to suggest that an outgoing model is better in any way than the incoming one....or to really say anything bad at all about the current car.
Also I have to believe both cars HAVE been run on the same day by the same ^^driver - so why not publish it? Seems a little self-serving to use that metric to discredit 3rd party testing while never providing that data, when they have it.
That said, I have no doubt the 500 is faster. It takes an already fast car and adds a ton of HP along with the quickness/smoothness of the DCT. The weight is like having a fat passenger in your 350 - it’s still going to get around the track just fine.
Preference between the cars is personal and subjective but one is definitely faster than the other. Consumables will be higher on the 500 but if you bought a car to do a lot of track days, you should have expected and planned for this..bench racing this stat doesn’t make much sense.
I’m sure the CFTP is a blast on the track, and I’m sure the weight acts differently on the track than just a fat passenger (no need to delve the physics of it all). At no point have I declared that it isn’t the “King” of hot laps between the R and the CFTP... just tougher on the wallet, in many ways, to run the King at the track.
Sure, if I’m some rich dude or I have all the consumables afforded to me cause I’m developing the car, that’s fine and dandy, but for us common folk it means a little more.
Good post, though, Jeff.
Sponsored