bluebeastsrt
Oh boy
- Joined
- May 10, 2015
- Threads
- 79
- Messages
- 7,552
- Reaction score
- 7,027
- Location
- New Jersey
- First Name
- BigD
- Vehicle(s)
- Ruby red 2019 GT Premium.
I mean this sh!t is literally the magazine racer mantra. Ignore
And don’t worry about the blue font. I just put you on ignore and won’t be replying to these types of posts in the future.
The This argument isn't about who's faster, it's about who has more off the line traction. It's a dumb argument, as if I were planning on lining the GT500 up against anyone, I'd quickly throw a set of drag radials on a be done with it.
So your going with v boxes and cell phones as your preferred methods of data gathering over a time slip? ok......no need to continue this conversation.Jesus I hate your blue font, can't read it for shit on the dark theme.
Again someone who doesn't understand the scientific method. If you take 30 measurements of 1 thing (a GT500 1/4 mile time) and take 30 measurements of another thing (a ZL! 1LE 1/4 mile time) and use the same instrument for both tests, the numbers are comparable. Done. Finito. End of story. Even if the numbers read 1% higher than another test using a different tool, the fact that the process and procedure for testing remains the same makes the comparison legitimate. Now if the machine is so wildly out of calibration that it's measurement is unreliable, then of course you can't use it. That's not the case here at all. These aren't being measured via i-phones in cupholders and free apps, these are V-box dataloggers that are the industry standard for acquiring data.
The repetition of the process eliminates anomalies, and the consistency of the method guarantees comparability.
And don’t worry about the blue font. I just put you on ignore and won’t be replying to these types of posts in the future.
Sponsored