Sponsored

PP2 Swaybar Data: Anyone Have It?

OP
OP
Roadway 5.0

Roadway 5.0

Strassejager
Joined
Dec 19, 2016
Threads
57
Messages
1,483
Reaction score
1,780
Location
New York - USA
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2016GT PP 6MT
Vehicle Showcase
1
Is the 350R bar also solid like the PP2?
24mm DIA x 3.6mm wall (0.94 x 0.14 in ) with 8mm (0.31 in) shorter

^^^Pulled this from the GT350 vs GT350R thread and answered my own question.

So long as the above data is true, and the lever arm length is constant, this would make the PP2 solid rear bar significantly stiffer than the GT350R’s, no? Even with the R bar 8mm shorter (and is this shorter at the mounting points?), a 34mm bar completely solid should trump this I would think.
Sponsored

 

Ron

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
295
Reaction score
194
Location
DFW
First Name
Ron
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT PP2
I’m guessing he worked this from the C&D article that stated a 20% increase for front springs & a 13% increase for the rear springs from the PP1. Math works out exactly (w/a sprinkle of rounding).
You are correct. Tho I prefer 'reverse engineering' v. the highly technical term ... 'sprinkle of rounding'. :sunglasses:
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
15,010
Reaction score
8,921
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
24mm DIA x 3.6mm wall (0.94 x 0.14 in ) with 8mm (0.31 in) shorter

^^^Pulled this from the GT350 vs GT350R thread and answered my own question.

So long as the above data is true, and the lever arm length is constant, this would make the PP2 solid rear bar significantly stiffer than the GT350R’s, no? Even with the R bar 8mm shorter (and is this shorter at the mounting points?), a 34mm bar completely solid should trump this I would think.
Stiffer, yeah, but probably not as much as you'd think. Bar torsional stiffness is primarily a function of the diameter^4. When you have a tube it's a function of OD^4-ID^4.
 

BlownGP

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Threads
32
Messages
1,058
Reaction score
279
Location
Houston/Baton Rouge
First Name
Steven
Vehicle(s)
Pontiac, Ford, Dodge
24mm DIA x 3.6mm wall (0.94 x 0.14 in ) with 8mm (0.31 in) shorter

^^^Pulled this from the GT350 vs GT350R thread and answered my own question.

So long as the above data is true, and the lever arm length is constant, this would make the PP2 solid rear bar significantly stiffer than the GT350R’s, no? Even with the R bar 8mm shorter (and is this shorter at the mounting points?), a 34mm bar completely solid should trump this I would think.
The way I look at this is it would be splitting hairs.
Unless you track the bars back to back. Would anybody notice a difference?
 
OP
OP
Roadway 5.0

Roadway 5.0

Strassejager
Joined
Dec 19, 2016
Threads
57
Messages
1,483
Reaction score
1,780
Location
New York - USA
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2016GT PP 6MT
Vehicle Showcase
1
Stiffer, yeah, but probably not as much as you'd think. Bar torsional stiffness is primarily a function of the diameter^4. When you have a tube it's a function of OD^4-ID^4.
Wow, you weren’t kidding. I just ran some generic numbers in the Fred Puhl calculator and the difference between a 3.6mm tube and solid was less than 1 lb/in with an array of arm and bar lengths.

It surprises me that more manufacturers don’t use a solid bar; it weighs a bit more but must be much cheaper to manufacture.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
Roadway 5.0

Roadway 5.0

Strassejager
Joined
Dec 19, 2016
Threads
57
Messages
1,483
Reaction score
1,780
Location
New York - USA
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2016GT PP 6MT
Vehicle Showcase
1
The way I look at this is it would be splitting hairs.
Unless you track the bars back to back. Would anybody notice a difference?
After looking into it, maybe only Mario Andretti would notice the difference.
 

BlownGP

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Threads
32
Messages
1,058
Reaction score
279
Location
Houston/Baton Rouge
First Name
Steven
Vehicle(s)
Pontiac, Ford, Dodge
Wow, you weren’t kidding. I just ran some generic numbers in the Fred Puhl calculator and the difference between a 3.6mm tube and solid was less than 1 lb/in with an array of arm and bar lengths.

It surprises me that more manufacturers don’t use a solid bar; it weighs a bit more but must be much cheaper to manufacture.
I've seen hollow bars crack but that was a different platform.
I'm going to order the rear PP2 bar Monday.
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
15,010
Reaction score
8,921
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
Wow, you weren’t kidding. I just ran some generic numbers in the Fred Puhl calculator and the difference between a 3.6mm tube and solid was less than 1 lb/in with an array of arm and bar lengths.

It surprises me that more manufacturers don’t use a solid bar; it weighs a bit more but must be much cheaper to manufacture.
Not really actually. A solid bar will cost more to make for sure. More material cost and the tooling to bend them needs to be beefier. Tubular steel is pretty cheap.
 
OP
OP
Roadway 5.0

Roadway 5.0

Strassejager
Joined
Dec 19, 2016
Threads
57
Messages
1,483
Reaction score
1,780
Location
New York - USA
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2016GT PP 6MT
Vehicle Showcase
1
Not really actually. A solid bar will cost more to make for sure. More material cost and the tooling to bend them needs to be beefier. Tubular steel is pretty cheap.
Good point. I was envisioning a manufacturer actually hallowing the steel. Pre-bought tube makes a lot of sense — less time to pump out bars this way too.
———
On a curious note: Would a hallow bar react any faster than a solid? My gut says yes, but maybe this is another instance of minimal gains. Thanks.
 

Sponsored

2018OFPP1?2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
659
Reaction score
445
Location
CA
First Name
Walt
Vehicle(s)
'92 LX 5.0 Vert, 2018 GT PP2
Part number sticker on the actual part...
IMG_20190518_114301807.jpg
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
15,010
Reaction score
8,921
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1

2015Etrac

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2016
Threads
121
Messages
1,580
Reaction score
359
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Black 2016 Mustang GT Premium 401a
The GT350R bars went up in price? I believe I paid around $125 for both front and rear from Levittown Ford last year.
 
 




Top