TheLion
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #796
Right, I understand where your going with the after market modifications, however FP, Motune and to a lesser degree Roush and Livernois have a working relationship with Ford. Ford would need to have reasonable evidence to suggest the failure was related directly to a Ford Performance or Montune modification. It seems unlikely they would throw a business partner like that under the bus, which attracts significant business to their performance line of cars, which is now quite extensive (Fiesta ST, Focus ST, Focus RS, Taurus SHO, F-150 based Raptor, Mustang and now the up and coming GT).I'm not saying I disagree with what you are saying here but think the way you're interpreting it is misleading. Now that you've read that, it would probably help if you read the Ford warranty and read it from their perspective. I referenced the section a while back but basically Ford says (loose translation, not a quote) if you modify your vehicle with aftermarket parts, they will not cover damage that may have come as a result of that upgrade.
There is no such thing as "voiding the warranty". That is a saying and not worded correctly at all. Nothing is voiding the warranty, even if you get a tune from another tuner that doesn't warrant it, it's the exact same thing. The only difference here is, that if there is a problem that Ford can blame on the upgrade, Ford Performance will cover it for 3/36. If there is a problem after 3/36 and Ford blames it on the upgrade, FP isn't going to cover it and neither will Ford because you made the modification. Believe me, Ford is very free thinking too on what "could" have been caused by the tune/modifications. For example that cam bolt. They can and most likely will say the extra stress from that tune was likely to blame. As for the fuel pump, well maybe they feel the tune ran the fuel pump at a higher duration than stock which led to early failure. You're very logical, I'm sure you understand my point. I'm not asking anyone to believe me, just pull out your warranty from Ford (don't ask someone) and read it.
I don't think it's as simple as them claiming a cambolt or what ever part / parts failed because of PCM software / CAI without being able to make a reasonable case as to how that could be as an example. Remember the dealer has some discretion even at their level and this is a warranted modification type that's been around for years on mustangs (Ford Performance Power Packs that is).
Ford would need to have reasonable evidence that the FP modification was indeed the cause. But at the very least we know your safe up to 36k with the FP solution.
Weather or not you want to stick with the FP software past that or move on to something hotter like Livernois after that period would be up to you, but there may still be less risk up to 60k with the FP software from a warranty standpoint. The language used by FP has been vetted by lawyers out the wazoo, you can bet on that. I can guarantee they also have consulted extensively on Ford to make sure their claims are not false to avoid legal trouble. I think it's a safe bet to rely on it as it is and it's pretty clear.
From a functional standpoint I am not aware of any failed engines using FP, Montune, Roush or Livernois software, at least not mustang Ecoboosts, Fiesta ST's or Focus ST's, but only one of the aforementioned offers any significant performance gain that would be worth considering stepping up to over what FP offers so I suppose their mention is more to illustrate the point.
Sponsored