Davy_Baby9
Well-Known Member
Arguing with fanboys is always a losing proposition.
Sponsored
Its actually 102hp per liter. However, I agree that GM has taken a proven platform and improved on it by squeezing every little bit out with modern technology. I honestly don't care for the MPG argument because I really only drive my 350 in a manner where economy is a mute point. As you mentioned, the Voodoo has gobs more character as an engine and also for me much more desirable power delivery for the track.To say it is the same basic engine is purely foolish. Sure it has the same general design, but today's engine has direct injection, cylinder deactivation, etc, all modern technologies.
Hp/L means absolutely nothing. I could say that my 2.0L in my CLA45 has 180hp/l, does that make it worlds better than the 5.2 with a "measly" 101 hp/l? Your argument is invalid; they have taken an old school design, and turned it into a very modern engine.
While the character and revving capabilities of the 5.2 are superior IMO, you cannot discredit the superior torque, packaging, weight, and fuel efficiency. If you could take your 5.2 and just get an extra 6-7mpg out of it, would you say "no thats dumb it's not supposed to be good on gas cause its a sports car"? Im positive you wouldn't.
You are simply discrediting the work and the engineering that has gone into the LT/LS motors that have taken a simple design from decades ago, and turned them into fantastic engines today with a Lot of desirable traits.
To say it is the same basic engine is purely foolish.
526/5.2 = 101.1 ;)Its actually 102hp per liter. However, I agree that GM has taken a proven platform and improved on it by squeezing every little bit out with modern technology. I honestly don't care for the MPG argument because I really only drive my 350 in a manner where economy is a mute point. As you mentioned, the Voodoo has gobs more character as an engine and also for me much more desirable power delivery for the track.
Isn't the V6 in the Camaro a more modern double overhead cam design? I think that V6 is a really good motor. I actually preferred it over the Mustang V6 when I drove them back to back on the same day a few years ago.I would be willing to bet their engineers only wish that they could go truly wild and design an all new engine from the ground up like the FP guys did with the 5.2L. It is the penny pinchers and accountants that are holding back the GM team from producing a similarly special engine; they can only work with what they are given.
If the reviews are really good and I can find a local dealer with a ZL1 I will probably at least check it out. If they won't let me drive it I might drive an SS at that time just to see what the car is like.Soooooooooooooooo, is anyone going to check out the ZL1 once it hits dealers lots?
I know I will.
Not me. Never liked the new Camaro design but loved the Gen 4 models. You simply can't see properly out of any Camaro.Soooooooooooooooo, is anyone going to check out the ZL1 once it hits dealers lots?
I know I will.
Nope it's a GMSoooooooooooooooo, is anyone going to check out the ZL1 once it hits dealers lots?
I know I will.
Yes, because LeMans race cars win solely based on their engine performance... You sound very bright.If the LS V8 engines are so great, how come the big block Corvettes got beat at LeMans by a 3.5L/215cid V6 engine. LOL
Honestly not sure, don't know much about their NA V6 because i admit it's not something I'm interested in hahaIsn't the V6 in the Camaro a more modern double overhead cam design? I think that V6 is a really good motor. I actually preferred it over the Mustang V6 when I drove them back to back on the same day a few years ago.
Not like the GM engineers would have to start from nothing to do a DOHC V8 engine.