ctandc72
Well-Known Member
Did you read the Road and Track article I linked? That was from 2015. They admit that with a manual, the driver is last question mark linking the power to the chassis. With an automatic - there is no question mark. I thought we were talking about performance cars? Taking "normal" cars are an entirely different ballgame. It's all about production numbers.i dont buy that at all. the r&d for dct, tooling and warranty claims are going to be astronomical compared to a manual. i bet once offerred that dct is going to have a retail of over $15k alone. now, i dont know the profit margin, but that trans alone is not a cost benefit in a single application like this. When the bmws had dct warranty claims, if it was more than replace oil gaskets/pans, the entire thing was replaced. im the 1st person to have a built getrag 7spd dct, and it took dodson 3+years to get it back to me. the gtr dct is what, $20k to build to handle high hp/tq/rpms? and thats only because of company's specific to building them + demand. I think we will luck out on that one if mustang and zr1s are getting a basically equal unit, so the aftermarket will find a way, but in no way could that be cheaper than 6spd warranty claims
And I'm not saying it's the main reason. There are numerous reasons and I guarantee you one of those reasons is financial. It's how car companies operate. Profit margin. Now when you start talking "Exclusive" and "ultra expensive" cars - such as super cars, that's an entirely different thing.
Sponsored