Sponsored

What lug nut torque have you settled on?

Dana Pants

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Threads
11
Messages
961
Reaction score
963
Location
Burlington MA
First Name
Dana
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP1
Hi everyone,

Since day 1, 150 ft*lb felt bad and I reduced to 140 ft*lb when attaching my wheels.

40k miles, lots of motorsports, and many tire changes later a stud broke on the only wheel bearing I haven’t had to replace.

I guess I’ll go for 130 ft*lb now and hope for the best.

Interestingly, if the factory studs are grade 8.8, then 120 ft*lb would make sense, and if they are grade 10.9, they should take 173 ft*lb. I therefore suspect they aren’t 10.9.

Some might argue that wheel studs are a wear item, but this is the first time in my life I had one break including several cars with 300k+ miles and lives just as hard.

So the questions:
Has anyone encountered an adverse effect due to lowering the wheel tightening torque? If so, what?

How low have you gone in lug nut torque?

P.S. I hate doing rear wheel bearings.

EBC42A13-A436-4EA3-92B5-6976F9348C0A.jpeg


97C25147-2350-4813-9CD5-22A512C6728A.jpeg
Sponsored

 

Bikeman315

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Threads
520
Messages
15,285
Reaction score
19,349
Location
Myrtle Beach, SC
First Name
Ira
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT/CS, 2021 Volvo XC60
Hi everyone,

Since day 1, 150 ft*lb felt bad and I reduced to 140 ft*lb when attaching my wheels.

40k miles, lots of motorsports, and many tire changes later a stud broke on the only wheel bearing I haven’t had to replace.

I guess I’ll go for 130 ft*lb now and hope for the best.

Interestingly, if the factory studs are grade 8.8, then 120 ft*lb would make sense, and if they are grade 10.9, they should take 173 ft*lb. I therefore suspect they aren’t 10.9.

Some might argue that wheel studs are a wear item, but this is the first time in my life I had one break including several cars with 300k+ miles and lives just as hard.

So the questions:
Has anyone encountered an adverse effect due to lowering the wheel tightening torque? If so, what?

How low have you gone in lug nut torque?

P.S. I hate doing rear wheel bearings.
So many threads over the years on this topic. Although some would disagree the majority weighs in at 150 as per Ford‘s recommendation.

https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/wheel-torque-question.170859/#post-3469715
 

TrackMustang

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Nov 24, 2021
Threads
34
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
1,524
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang GT
When I picked up my aftermarket wheels the stock lugs didn’t fit anymore. The wheel manufacturer gave me a set of lug nuts and said the torque spec was 105ft/lbs. I’ve been using that torque since with no issues.
 

MAGS1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2020
Threads
50
Messages
5,935
Reaction score
9,005
Location
Somewhere in Middle America
First Name
Mark
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT
150 ft/lbs. all day, every day no issues. On stock wheels for winter and SVE CFX for spring, summer and fall. I had aftermarket wheels on my 2016 as well and was at 150 with no issues.
 

Cory S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Threads
47
Messages
3,355
Reaction score
3,702
Location
Bradford, NH
First Name
Cory
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
I use 127-130lb-ft and use a micro film of antisense every few rotations. Stud threads never gall and never loosen.
 

Sponsored

Biggsy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2018
Threads
186
Messages
2,265
Reaction score
1,642
Location
MD
First Name
Warren
Vehicle(s)
'17 GT PP, '10 Tundra
I use 150 on track and street. ARP studs on front. Will upgrade the rear during the winter to GT4 studs. Less chance of them breaking
 

Skye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Threads
12
Messages
1,717
Reaction score
2,428
Location
≈39N
Vehicle(s)
"Skye" Mach1 N2144
150 lb-ft, per Ford and SVE.
 

Cory S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Threads
47
Messages
3,355
Reaction score
3,702
Location
Bradford, NH
First Name
Cory
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
FWIW, my buddy was still putting his lug nuts on an 800whp 2018 GT with 100lb-ft. I mentioned the “spec” was 150, and he was like “WTF”…. He’s probably swapped wheels off and on at least 30 times in the last 3 years. He’s never had one come loose. He’s been doing them like mine now at 130.
 

Sponsored

Biggsy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2018
Threads
186
Messages
2,265
Reaction score
1,642
Location
MD
First Name
Warren
Vehicle(s)
'17 GT PP, '10 Tundra
Also you never want to torque them while they are hot. I know a few people in the track group have suffered broken studs because they take their wheels off soon as they come into the paddock from the track .
 

DougS550

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Threads
234
Messages
3,429
Reaction score
1,735
Location
Indiana
First Name
Doug
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT Premium A10 PP1 Whipple Stage 2
Hi everyone,

Since day 1, 150 ft*lb felt bad and I reduced to 140 ft*lb when attaching my wheels.

40k miles, lots of motorsports, and many tire changes later a stud broke on the only wheel bearing I haven’t had to replace.

I guess I’ll go for 130 ft*lb now and hope for the best.

Interestingly, if the factory studs are grade 8.8, then 120 ft*lb would make sense, and if they are grade 10.9, they should take 173 ft*lb. I therefore suspect they aren’t 10.9.

Some might argue that wheel studs are a wear item, but this is the first time in my life I had one break including several cars with 300k+ miles and lives just as hard.

So the questions:
Has anyone encountered an adverse effect due to lowering the wheel tightening torque? If so, what?

How low have you gone in lug nut torque?

P.S. I hate doing rear wheel bearings.

EBC42A13-A436-4EA3-92B5-6976F9348C0A.jpeg


97C25147-2350-4813-9CD5-22A512C6728A.jpeg
150 lbs as recommended by my 19 Ford service manual.
 

boB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2018
Threads
15
Messages
1,042
Reaction score
1,019
Location
FL
First Name
boB
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT PP1
There is plenty of data to show that bolts/studs that are undertorqued are likely to fail much sooner than those that are torqued properly.
 

Gnatsum21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2021
Threads
12
Messages
1,068
Reaction score
2,065
Location
Fort Lauderdale FL
Vehicle(s)
Former: GT 21 Roush Twister Orange RIP | ECO 2016
120
 

Cory S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Threads
47
Messages
3,355
Reaction score
3,702
Location
Bradford, NH
First Name
Cory
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
There is plenty of data to show that bolts/studs that are undertorqued are likely to fail much sooner than those that are torqued properly.
Define “under torqued”. That could mean 60lb-ft, 75lb-ft, 100lb-ft, 130lb-ft.

Define “fail”.

I’ve seen more failures of lug nut/studs in my 35 years from over tightening (or even torquing to “spec”) than under torquing. Obviously I don’t mean just forgetting to tighten the lug nuts. That’s going to happen eventually to people who aren’t thorough anyway.
Sponsored

 
 




Top