Dana Pants
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2018
- Threads
- 11
- Messages
- 961
- Reaction score
- 963
- Location
- Burlington MA
- First Name
- Dana
- Vehicle(s)
- 2018 GT PP1
- Thread starter
- #1
Hi everyone,
Since day 1, 150 ft*lb felt bad and I reduced to 140 ft*lb when attaching my wheels.
40k miles, lots of motorsports, and many tire changes later a stud broke on the only wheel bearing I haven’t had to replace.
I guess I’ll go for 130 ft*lb now and hope for the best.
Interestingly, if the factory studs are grade 8.8, then 120 ft*lb would make sense, and if they are grade 10.9, they should take 173 ft*lb. I therefore suspect they aren’t 10.9.
Some might argue that wheel studs are a wear item, but this is the first time in my life I had one break including several cars with 300k+ miles and lives just as hard.
So the questions:
Has anyone encountered an adverse effect due to lowering the wheel tightening torque? If so, what?
How low have you gone in lug nut torque?
P.S. I hate doing rear wheel bearings.
Since day 1, 150 ft*lb felt bad and I reduced to 140 ft*lb when attaching my wheels.
40k miles, lots of motorsports, and many tire changes later a stud broke on the only wheel bearing I haven’t had to replace.
I guess I’ll go for 130 ft*lb now and hope for the best.
Interestingly, if the factory studs are grade 8.8, then 120 ft*lb would make sense, and if they are grade 10.9, they should take 173 ft*lb. I therefore suspect they aren’t 10.9.
Some might argue that wheel studs are a wear item, but this is the first time in my life I had one break including several cars with 300k+ miles and lives just as hard.
So the questions:
Has anyone encountered an adverse effect due to lowering the wheel tightening torque? If so, what?
How low have you gone in lug nut torque?
P.S. I hate doing rear wheel bearings.
Sponsored