Sponsored

Thoughts on suspension upgrades

EricSMG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Threads
3
Messages
361
Reaction score
106
Location
San Diego
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT w/PP, 2004 BMW M3 Coupe
TCA045 and only the TCA045.

I have recommended anything else, zero times. I am not a fan of Delrin on vertical links.

NVH will not be an issue. I have about 1000 sets of these out there and can count on less than 5 fingers how many NVH issues I have dealt with, with these particular pieces. They really are the bees knees. ;)
On a bone stock GTPP save for your lockout kit - what changes will I notice with these links?
Sponsored

 

Rebellion

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Threads
14
Messages
1,052
Reaction score
273
Location
Houston
Vehicle(s)
2016 Competition Orange GT
When putting my poly vertical links on...I finally realized the benefits of a spherical bearing. The load on the vert link is not purely "vertical" (along the axis of the link), there are significant traversal forces and movement. In the case of poly (and delrin), it will load the bearing asymmetrically to some degree, at weird angles. I'm not sure if this is the correct way to explain it, but when you see the mechanism at different height, you will notice that the vertical link joints (in this case, the bearing) actually require some freedom of movement. A solid ball/socket type of joint seems to make a lot of sense in this application, which I think is reason why Kelly is so adamant about the TCA045's.

I'm sure a lot of my terminology above is wrong, but well, it's sort of hard to explain. After I realized how the mechanism works, I wish I would have gotten the 45's.
 
 








Top