Sponsored

Performance Package for Daily Driver...comments? experiences?

Kevin08

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Threads
32
Messages
2,422
Reaction score
1,302
Location
Panhandle FL
First Name
Kevin
Vehicle(s)
19GT
Some describe the PP as floaty, too. The fix for that seems to be different springs. Is it possible the floatiness of a non-PP suspension would also be mostly eliminated with the same upgrade?
Sponsored

 

5.Stock

Active Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
38
Reaction score
16
Location
Houston, TX
First Name
Eloy
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Competition Orange
In Houston we have like 2 seasons winter and summer......and i daily mine had the car about 10 with over 16k miles and i love it. i even have steeda progressive lowering springs on it made the car a bit stiffer but well worth it. i have scrapped couple times but nothing major. i also have recaros in them and im a big guy
 

no_moochers

Active Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2015
Threads
13
Messages
40
Reaction score
5
Location
Little Rock, AR
Vehicle(s)
2015 Race Red GT PP
I DD mine, and wouldn't give it up for the world. All the perks are so worth the price. 3.73s are short, but if you live in a relatively flat area you can just start in 2nd. My one recommendation (only if you care a lot about your car looking clean) is get new wheels with less spokes. Those Brembos put off a metric fuck-ton of brake dust and my wheels go from glossy to matte in less than a whole tank and take FOREVER to clean. Plus if you get new wheels you can go square and rotate tires, win-win!
 

Malkionx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2015
Threads
2
Messages
49
Reaction score
4
Location
toronto
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ford Ecoboost Performance Pack
Is there any truth behind the EB PP brakes being unmarked brembos?
 

no_moochers

Active Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2015
Threads
13
Messages
40
Reaction score
5
Location
Little Rock, AR
Vehicle(s)
2015 Race Red GT PP
Is there any truth behind the EB PP brakes being unmarked brembos?
EB PP Brakes are the same as non-PP GT brakes, so I dont think so
 

Sponsored

SnoopisTDI

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
260
Reaction score
66
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Guard 2015 GTPP, Recaros, 2004 Lexus GX470
As others have said, 3.73 makes first gear a little short, but after a couple days it feels normal. Recaros are fine - I just drove 1000 miles in a day (twice) and while it wasn't quite as nice as my GTI was, it wasn't uncomfortable. The only thing I noticed was I kept slouching into the seat and had to remind myself several times to sit up straight. :confused: The only thing to worry about, IMO, is the shitty tires and the lack of a spare tire. If you can deal with that, you'll love it.

I'm curious, to all of you guys who have the "wouldn't have a Mustang without PP" attitude, have you all driven the regular GTs/EBs for comparison?

Seems like "Gotta have a V8" is now "Gotta have PP"
I drove a non-PP Eco and then my GTPP. I thought the non-PP Eco felt kind of bouncy, like the springs were too stiff for the light car. Then I got in the GTPP and it felt a bit heavy, but the ride was better IMO, like that weight kept things settled.
 

73MachI

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
337
Reaction score
121
Location
Ontario
First Name
Brett
Vehicle(s)
15 Mustang GT M6 PP ESP Magnetic
Perspective, the 3.73 drives exactly like my 1999 Honda Civic Si daily driver in terms of shift points and the amount of rowing.

Aside from that, I don't DD my PP so I cannot comment except to say that if you like driving sticks and you're not in stop-and-go all day, you will probably love the PP.

Downside for my climate is the staggered wheels (no spare, or at least a complex spare scenario).
 

Jeff73Mach1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
60
Reaction score
6
Location
Nashville, Tennessee
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ford Mustang GT PP
I daily drive mine. I get about 17 mpg in the city, 35 on the road. I changed the tires to BFG G force II A/S and am very happy with them. In heavy traffic, it is no more of a pain than any other stick shift. This is a great car.
 

cbrookre

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Threads
36
Messages
2,223
Reaction score
826
Location
Ridgefield, WA
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Convertible 50th app
EB PP Brakes are the same as non-PP GT brakes, so I dont think so
I think this rumor came from the fact that the non-PP GT brakes have the same specs and seem to have the same shape as the 2014 and earlier PP Brembros. So not Brembros but seem equivalent.

To provide a different perspective, I have a non-PP 2015 GT convertible and I see very little need to have the PP. The non-PP GT is wicked fast as it is for the street, stops on a dime, and handles very well even with the all weather tires (mine are the 255 wide 19", the smaller 235 may have more traction issues). Without doing some instrumented tests, I am not sure you would notice the difference. Certainly my daily skill is not enough to notice any difference anyway, the car is far more capable than I am able to make real use of off the track. And I do not street race, so for on-ramps and the like I have plenty of car to have some fun without worrying about losing any races by not having some marginal advantage.

Just my perspective and you choose how you spend your dollars.
 

MaskedRacerX

Driver
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Threads
73
Messages
5,611
Reaction score
4,688
Location
Vilano Beach, FL
First Name
DT
Vehicle(s)
'21_JWS4XE / '21_TM3P
I'm curious, to all of you guys who have the "wouldn't have a Mustang without PP" attitude, have you all driven the regular GTs/EBs for comparison?
My GT to GT/PP comparison, PP as the reference:

It felt more precise, the turn in was more immediate, the transitions were more predictable, the overall feel was way more stable, planted, and to use the common parlance here, it was very noticeably less "floaty". Getting on the power out of turn was much more controlled (I suspect the Torsen rear diff making a significant contribution).

The 3:73s are a hoot. It's not my DD, and when I'm driving, I love to shift, plus the 3:73s wind the motor up so quickly into the top end power band (where things really start happening).

I would've likely added a STB, probably the K-brace at some point: I'm convinced that sort of additional bracing has a notable impact, even more so on a convertible.

The overall better handling feel is probably a whole combination of things, vs. just swapping out springs on the non-PP model, there's springs, shocks, swaybar, bracing, Torsen rear and even PP specific electronics.

From just a pure aesthetic standpoint I much prefer the PP wheels, wheel/tire staggered setup and dash finish (with the gauges being a fun little finishing touch).

The brakes are stunning from a pure aesthetic standpoint, sure they're better, but I'll be the first to admit you'd need to be engaged in some 9/10ths driving, on a +track+ before you tested their limits.

You get these upgrades, on day one, no wrenching, no downtime, they're covered under warranty, and it's all dialed in to work together as a final product that adds notable objective performance enhancements, as well as nice [subjective] visual impact.

My $0.02 :)
 

Sponsored

blk_5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Threads
5
Messages
377
Reaction score
67
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
CO 2015 GT PP
I'm curious, to all of you guys who have the "wouldn't have a Mustang without PP" attitude, have you all driven the regular GTs/EBs for comparison?

Seems like "Gotta have a V8" is now "Gotta have PP"
Yep. Test drove a couple premiums and two PPs, didn't even contemplate the EB. I thought I'd probably get a premium non PP with 3.55s (that's what my 14 was) until I drove the PP cars. From there it was will I fit in the Recaros or not. The PP felt more precise, brakes were way better both aesthetically and performance wise, 3.73s make it feel like a rocket in 1st/2nd, and it came with staggered wheels that I liked the look of much more not to mention the other little cool stuff. I actually went and drove the two cars back to back a second time to verify that it wasn't an impulse decision. At the end it was a "Gotta have a PP" for me since I could take the PP car off the lot, add an exhaust and be happy with it for a while. I understand not everyone is that way and if I was drag racing or going forced induction right away I'm sure I would've thought differently. As far as bang for your buck as a DD, PP is hard to beat IMO
 

VertMustang98GT

Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Threads
51
Messages
950
Reaction score
304
Location
614 Ohio
First Name
Ray
Vehicle(s)
17 GT350
Vehicle Showcase
3
Yep. Test drove a couple premiums and two PPs, didn't even contemplate the EB. I thought I'd probably get a premium non PP with 3.55s (that's what my 14 was) until I drove the PP cars. From there it was will I fit in the Recaros or not. The PP felt more precise, brakes were way better both aesthetically and performance wise, 3.73s make it feel like a rocket in 1st/2nd, and it came with staggered wheels that I liked the look of much more not to mention the other little cool stuff. I actually went and drove the two cars back to back a second time to verify that it wasn't an impulse decision. At the end it was a "Gotta have a PP" for me since I could take the PP car off the lot, add an exhaust and be happy with it for a while. I understand not everyone is that way and if I was drag racing or going forced induction right away I'm sure I would've thought differently. As far as bang for your buck as a DD, PP is hard to beat IMO
I did the same and decided on basically the same vehicle you have.

MT82 has been refined in the 2015+ and once you add a MGW Shifter, it's like a brand new car again, but better.
 

DaUnit

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
126
Reaction score
29
Location
DC
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT/PP Shadow Black
Constantly in bumper to bumper traffic where i'm at no issues! However i do notice my summer tires losing little bit of it's grip when its below 20degrees out which is normal (I also drive with traction control off, lol..)
 

dogiebitt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Threads
12
Messages
700
Reaction score
192
Location
Deland, FL
First Name
Danny
Vehicle(s)
2021 Ram 1500 Rebel 5.7L
Vehicle Showcase
1
Some describe the PP as floaty, too. The fix for that seems to be different springs. Is it possible the floatiness of a non-PP suspension would also be mostly eliminated with the same upgrade?
If someone thinks PP is floaty, their last car was a slammed civic with cut springs and no bump stops.
Those reflector things on the lines on the roads feel like potholes to me, to give an illustration of the ride stiffness. In my girlfriends 2014 Fusion I don't even feel them (just hear) when I run over them.

I'm curious, to all of you guys who have the "wouldn't have a Mustang without PP" attitude, have you all driven the regular GTs/EBs for comparison?

Seems like "Gotta have a V8" is now "Gotta have PP"
Test drove a base and premium GT, a base and premium EB, and had the sales guy drive me around in both the GT and EB with the PP. The non-PP cars definitely had a ton of body roll to them. Felt like I was on marshmallows going into turns.
 

Zerobar78

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
382
Reaction score
79
Location
Phoenix
Vehicle(s)
2015 CO GT, PP
I agree with most in having driven both, the PP is, in my opinion, a better setup even for daily driving.

One gripe I'm having is the gearing on the track, I'm getting to the rev limiter in 2nd too often and facing the 2-3 debate, I think a 3.55 would better serve an autocross car.
Sponsored

 
 








Top