Sponsored

New Intake Cam set in development

Performance nut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Threads
178
Messages
1,665
Reaction score
636
Location
TX
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT A10
Vehicle Showcase
1
at 1070 wheel on e85 and 1200 on ftw, i haven't seen any drivabilty / tuning issues with the car.

options are always nice, but we've seen 0 issues with the comps on our car or any customers cars
I haven't researched Comp cams for the Coyote engine. Did you happen to have any dyno links for these with similar modifications to this project (GT350 IM, CAI, LT hearders)?
Sponsored

 

turbosc297

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
163
Reaction score
71
Location
mn
Vehicle(s)
2022 GT
Really quite a bummer that a proper A/B test wasn't performed here...
 

Performance nut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Threads
178
Messages
1,665
Reaction score
636
Location
TX
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT A10
Vehicle Showcase
1
Got a follow up email:

That is correct. I did not do back to back tests with cams only on the 2016 at the shop, we did that before with the 11-14 cams which these 15+ cams are based on.

Here is a link to the 11-14 testing we did which WAS done back to back with no other changes:

http://www.svt performance .com/forums/showthread.php?1114836-Custom-L-amp-M-Intake-Cam-change-results (remove the spaces)

The 2015+ engines run 13MM lift with the same overall duration as the 11-14’s but with a centerline that is farther advanced. Basically the same lobe as a Boss intake cam but moved 30 degrees on the stick. The thread above was a test of the New custom intake cam VS the stock Boss 13MM intake cam. Gains were as expected, adding 16 degrees of duration netted 17RWHP without a loss of any low/midrange power.

The 2015+ cams are 4 degrees larger and have 1MM more lift than the 11-14 cams tested in the thread above. Same principle, slightly larger as the data gathered in the original test showed we had room for more if desired.

Since power gained is not static for each individual setup we simply have to use math. The engine in the original test gained 3.5% power from the intake cams at 6400+RPM without losing any power under the curve.

One can deduce a slightly larger cam for the 2015+ should net slightly better results, but let’s just say 3.5% power gained from 6400+, on a 420RWHP full bolt on 2015+ car the cams would be worth ~15HP.

Keep in mind these cams work best with higher reving setups like the GT350 and SCJ since the gains only show up from 6400+.

With boost the cams would be worth more power as 3.5% gained is 3.5% gained.

I’ve also gone so far as checking piston to valve clearance on the stock camshaft vs the new intake cam on a factory stock engine to ensure full TiVCT is not a problem. The lobe profile was designed by L&M specifically for use with stock valve springs in a boosted application so valve float is not going to be an issue either.

Shaun
AED
 
Last edited:

beefcake

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Threads
1,527
Messages
12,780
Reaction score
5,279
Location
Bethel
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ford Mustang
I haven't researched Comp cams for the Coyote engine. Did you happen to have any dyno links for these with similar modifications to this project (GT350 IM, CAI, LT hearders)?
problem is, most of the time, when people are adding cams, they are making alot of changes at the same time.

hard to get a just before on after, as it's so much work to go into the engine
 

Performance nut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Threads
178
Messages
1,665
Reaction score
636
Location
TX
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT A10
Vehicle Showcase
1
problem is, most of the time, when people are adding cams, they are making alot of changes at the same time.

hard to get a just before on after, as it's so much work to go into the engine
I'll be happy to pay for the dynos if someone will sponsor the parts and installation :D
 

Sponsored

Lonmon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Threads
17
Messages
716
Reaction score
275
Location
Mid East US
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT 10spd Base
Thats a lot of money and work for 15hp. Not me, if its not a 30-50whp gain I am not going through all the expense and work. For me this is not a viable option. Those gains could have easily been from the exhaust alone or close to it. I guess someone with deep pockets, low aspirations, and a need to keep as close to stock drivability as possible might be interested. Someone show me what I'm missing. It's easier to tune? I didn't know the better tuners were having such a hard time with getting cams right.
 

Petroleum Jesus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2016
Threads
12
Messages
430
Reaction score
165
Location
Houston, TX
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
Thats a lot of money and work for 15hp. Not me, if its not a 30-50whp gain I am not going through all the expense and work. For me this is not a viable option. Those gains could have easily been from the exhaust alone or close to it. I guess someone with deep pockets, low aspirations, and a need to keep as close to stock drivability as possible might be interested. Someone show me what I'm missing. It's easier to tune? I didn't know the better tuners were having such a hard time with getting cams right.
My engine is bone stock right now, and I agree. By the time I install LTs, IM, CAI, Cams, and injectors, my investment is getting into 5K+ territory, and for that money I might as well get a Whipple and leave the rest. When the time comes to upgrade to my next mustang, it will be much easier to swap over as well.
 

WhiteyDog

WOOF!!!
Joined
Jun 30, 2016
Threads
16
Messages
1,788
Reaction score
733
Location
Manheim, Pa.
Vehicle(s)
16
Thats a lot of money and work for 15hp. Not me, if its not a 30-50whp gain I am not going through all the expense and work. For me this is not a viable option. Those gains could have easily been from the exhaust alone or close to it. I guess someone with deep pockets, low aspirations, and a need to keep as close to stock drivability as possible might be interested. Someone show me what I'm missing. It's easier to tune? I didn't know the better tuners were having such a hard time with getting cams right.
Yeah, was hoping for more gains from these new cams as well. Looks like I'll be keeping my stock cams.
 

Sponsored

Evolvd

Instigator
Joined
Jan 19, 2015
Threads
186
Messages
6,865
Reaction score
5,867
Location
Northwest Florida
First Name
Brian
Vehicle(s)
2021 Shelby GT500
Like Beefcake said, cams aren't going to be a "go-to" part for most folks due to the cost and time involved to swap them. However, if you're already pulling your motor and going for big power, it's an option.

I certainly miss working on my old 4G63 Evo motor. I could swap cams in that thing in about 2 hours and be back on the road.
 

Terminator2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
1,960
Reaction score
448
Location
Spring Hill Florida
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
My engine is bone stock right now, and I agree. By the time I install LTs, IM, CAI, Cams, and injectors, my investment is getting into 5K+ territory, and for that money I might as well get a Whipple and leave the rest. When the time comes to upgrade to my next mustang, it will be much easier to swap over as well.
I would definitely add the LTs and if doing a Centri blower intake manifold is worth it.
 

Captdistraction

Not the Stig
Joined
Sep 3, 2016
Threads
28
Messages
219
Reaction score
43
Location
Phoenix
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2016 mustang GT350 Tech Pack, 2011 Mustang Racecar, 2011 Raptor
Timing cover gotta come off for intake cam swap?
Absolutely. You have to align the crank, remove the chains on both sides, then set the chain alignments again.

There's nothing hard in the process (though it seems difficult on paper), but it is time-consuming.
 

Reds197

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Threads
29
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
339
Location
KC
Vehicle(s)
18 BASE (sold)16 LPF 62mm 16 Whipple 15 VMP MT-82
Maybe worth the time on 11-14 cars but I dont see much value on the 15+ cars.
Sponsored

 
 








Top