Lund vs Whipple tune

[zaquhree]

Nothing to touch. That guy has a big button on his forehead and I have to press on it.

He has created his whole identity around a 10.5 supercharger and probably lives in an apartment. I love that.

Did you get your feelings hurt? Cause you seem to have me on your mind still

Assume all you want.

Your car "will run 10.4" but right now it doesn't.

You're really setting the S550 world on fire with all your fast S550 tunes out there. Maybe if you spent more time doing vs. talking you'd get somewhere. Maybe you'd be closer to your "10.4"

Sponsored

 

[Dat Boi Kumar]

I'm running constant 10.5's @134MPH in the quarter on whipples auto cal!

 

[zaquhree]

I'm running constant 10.5's @134MPH in the quarter on whipples auto cal!

Yeah I saw we ran the same exact et lol, nice work. I do wish I had the 60' y'all get with the PD. Was your 10.5 on the 93 or race gas tune?

 

[Travis@boostworks]

We went 178mph in the half mile in our car that was geared to run the mile. Makes over 1200whp, and was tuned by Lund. I think both Whipple and Lund have excellent methodology when it comes to tuning approach.

Don't focus so much on dyno numbers.. They don't paint the entire picture. Our customer's Kenne Bell/Lund tuned 705whp auto went 10.30's @ 135mph. I've seen cars that dyno a peak number 70whp higher run the same time/mph or slower.

It's not just about peak numbers. How often do you spend at the rpm where peak power is made?

 

[Dat Boi Kumar]

Yeah I saw we ran the same exact et lol, nice work. I do wish I had the 60' y'all get with the PD. Was your 10.5 on the 93 or race gas tune?

It was on 93 tune, but was running MS109 in it.

 

[sigintel]

Well I think 10.5 w a Paxton out of the box rocks.

Congrats again on 10.5!
Excellent performance vs cost build
:rant::headbonk::shrug:

 

[Deranged1]

I respect the hell out of Lund's tuning but with all the features that Whipple offers, their tune would be hard to pass up. My vote is, if you're going to run pump gas, stick with Whipple. Trap speeds look to be about the same. Plus, the software and tuning continues to get better and better. If race gas or E85 is in the plans, obviously Lund.

 

[PowerAdderGT]

We went 178mph in the half mile in our car that was geared to run the mile. Makes over 1200whp, and was tuned by Lund. I think both Whipple and Lund have excellent methodology when it comes to tuning approach.

Don't focus so much on dyno numbers.. They don't paint the entire picture. Our customer's Kenne Bell/Lund tuned 705whp auto went 10.30's @ 135mph. I've seen cars that dyno a peak number 70whp higher run the same time/mph or slower.

It's not just about peak numbers. How often do you spend at the rpm where peak power is made?

Travis, can you post up the time slip and/or video of that 10.3 @135 run?

 

[5.0 Steve]

Back to the OP i think the Whipple tune wins out because its free with the kit ....unless you really increase the boost or have cat deletes like me then call Lund

 

[Jmeo]

I say try the Whipple tune. Flight control is a game changer.

Also you can run race gas any time you want the cal will automatically change timing and take advantage of the higher octane.

 

[Higgs Boson]

Did you get your feelings hurt? Cause you seem to have me on your mind still

Assume all you want.

Your car "will run 10.4" but right now it doesn't.

You're really setting the S550 world on fire with all your fast S550 tunes out there. Maybe if you spent more time doing vs. talking you'd get somewhere. Maybe you'd be closer to your "10.4"

keep posting, you keep showing that you're not too bright. It doesn't make your 10.5 fast. Compare apples to apples instead of your supercharger to my nearly stock mustang....your car is slow, yes my mustang is currently even slower.....only difference is I don't think my mustang is fast but you think yours is "getting it done." It's not.

So go ahead and post asking the same questions you have answers to since you aren't smart enough to have an actual conversation and really don't know anything about your own car and all you can do is try and point things that really have no bearing on your car being slow. It doesn't matter if my mustang runs 14s or 8s, YOUR mustang should be in the 9s but it's not, hasn't even broken 10.5 yet. That's slow for your combination.

 

[Farrdaddy]

Is there an ignore feature in this forum..thank you. Found it

 

[mrs2c5s]

Sounds like we got an interent racer on board......

 

[zaquhree]

keep posting, you keep showing that you're not too bright. It doesn't make your 10.5 fast. Compare apples to apples instead of your supercharger to my nearly stock mustang....your car is slow, yes my mustang is currently even slower.....only difference is I don't think my mustang is fast but you think yours is "getting it done." It's not.

So go ahead and post asking the same questions you have answers to since you aren't smart enough to have an actual conversation and really don't know anything about your own car and all you can do is try and point things that really have no bearing on your car being slow. It doesn't matter if my mustang runs 14s or 8s, YOUR mustang should be in the 9s but it's not, hasn't even broken 10.5 yet. That's slow for your combination.

I edited my posts so you would quite yapping but you keep doing it.

Once again, your Mustang is slower and you have yet to prove you have tuned ANYTHING worth mentioning in the S550 world. Carry old Mr. Irrelevant.:amen:

Congrats again on 10.5!
Excellent performance vs cost build
:rant::headbonk::shrug:

Thanks! It is nice to see the out-of-the-box kits running mid 10's. Although according to some they should run 5's because other people have done it somewhere.

 

[18psi]

keep posting, you keep showing that you're not too bright. It doesn't make your 10.5 fast. Compare apples to apples instead of your supercharger to my nearly stock mustang....your car is slow, yes my mustang is currently even slower.....only difference is I don't think my mustang is fast but you think yours is "getting it done." It's not.

You called out his slow 10.5 mustang when yours doesn't even run 10.5
No one here cares about any other cars you or anyone else has. At all. This is a coyote discussion in a coyote forum AFAIK.
I really hope you don't think you're sounding like the more intelligent party here, cause if so, I got bad news for you.

What he's saying is there aren't that many s550's running 10.5 @ 130+, and my observations tend to agree. Many here like to dyno plot race, and then you see 800hp cars trapping lower than 600hp cars and the excuses start.

Sponsored