it is and it isn't, every degree of timing up to about 25 will yield 10-20 rwhp depending on the combo, so pop in 1-2 degrees and lean it out a little will get the job done41rwhp and 20rwtq less is a lot considering that the only change on the car was a tune. Dyno comparison was done on the same car, same dyno and same day.
I can understand the claim for longevity but Lund is acting like all customers have the same goals. I drive my car 5000 miles per year and I am insane when it comes to maintaining my cars. My goal is results for the amount of money that I have spent and will end up spending. 41rwhp and 20rwtq less with Lund's tune is not the results that I paid for.
I would have been fine with my Lund tune if my logs would have looks similar to the ones that Travis posted in this thread here http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43888
Heck, my ECTs and ACTs are always lower than the ones in Travis's logs with a 93oct tune. Yet, Lund had my tune even more conservative than Travis's even after me trying to get him to just bump timing a little "was at 16.8 and looking for 18.5" and leaning out the A/F just a little "was at 11.2 and looking for 11.5". Lund said NO to my request so he shouldn't be surprised when someone like me gets pissed.
i'm running 24 degrees of timing on 25 psi, lol
Sponsored