zaquhree
Well-Known Member
you are trying to be a dick, not gonna work. 10.5 is fast no matter how you cut it.not sure you understand my question, i was referring directly to your sig. try again.
Sponsored
you are trying to be a dick, not gonna work. 10.5 is fast no matter how you cut it.not sure you understand my question, i was referring directly to your sig. try again.
10.5 was fast in 2002. at least you went with the right kind of blower...you are trying to be a dick, not gonna work. 10.5 is fast no matter how you cut it.

K 8's and 9's are slow cause people have gone 6's and 7's. Great logic.10.5 was fast in 2002. at least you went with the right kind of blower...
8's is fast now. 9's is not hard to hit anymore, especially with FI.
not trying to be a dick, just putting your comments in perspective, a little too much "look at me" comments....."look at me getting it done." lol. lame.
try running 8s and being humble about it and then I'll invite you to my birthday party.
haha, how did I know you'd say that? like I am serious or even have birthday parties or it's even realistic. too funny how that actually affects you.Who cares about your birthday party exactly? Cause I don't?
My car is a daily driven/out of the box car that ran 10's first pass and 10.5 as a best. So people have ran 7's and 6's, so by your logic those 8's and 9's are slow...genius you are.
Since you're such a good tuner, how fast is your car? Where are your 10 second S550's? You seem like a lot of talk.
Tl;drhaha, how did I know you'd say that? like I am serious or even have birthday parties or it's even realistic. too funny how that actually affects you.
i dont think you get logic very good if you think that my logic means 8s are slow if some people run 6s. not too smart but I won't hold it against you.
my fast car is not my mustang. I have an 1100 hp C7 and an NHRA/IHRA Super Stock car (that runs a heck of a lot faster than 10.5 with a low compression naturally aspirated 1968 small valve 327).
I have had my mustang for a matter of months, all i have done is suspension stuff and a GT350 intake. watch for a twin turbo and send me your lunch money.
btw, everyone is all talk on the internet. you can't race online, but if you're ever in texas, better bring some good fuel.
you know I am only doing this because you are swinging your 10.5 around like it's awesome, right? just because you have a 6 inch weiner doesn't mean you have to take it out and do the helicopter....there's a lot of 7 inchers out there.
its a 16, not a 15...look left about 2 inches. haven't been to the track with it but I will send you tissues (for your eyes, perv) when it runs a 10.4 naturally aspirated.Tl;dr
What's your 15 run again?
Where are your 10 second tuned 15+ mustangs?
Until you answer those keep quiet. For what it is my car is impressive, if you don't respect it that's fine because I couldn't care less.
Nice rhetoric, throw jargon and acronyms to make yourself sound intelligent.its a 16, not a 15...look left about 2 inches. haven't been to the track with it but I will send you tissues (for your eyes, perv) when it runs a 10.4 naturally aspirated.
you must think I am a professional tuner, which I will take as a compliment. tuning doesn't pay enough to support the things I want to do in life. I just fix people's "pro tunes."
your car runs exactly what a mustang with a bolted on supercharger should run. as long as you think it's impressive then that's all that matters. but just because you paid for a supercharger kit and paid to have someone else tune your car doesn't give you any credibility at all.
btw, I am not in competition with you, you can't compete with me. I appreciate you assuming that's what this is, telling me to "keep quiet" lol....sounds like you're out of information so now the conversation is over?
if you want to have a real conversation with me, what is your IVO and IVC at 3000 and 6500 RPM? until you answer that question, better to just keep quiet.
i sound intelligent to you? you just keep complimenting me! thank you!Nice rhetoric, throw jargon and acronyms to make yourself sound intelligent.
Point out is a 16? K, tool.
Once again...what does your super tuned mustang run? How many 2015+ have you put down the track with respectable times?
You run your mouth like you're a amazing tuner yet all I see are words...no data or slips to back it up.
Until it runs "10.4" NA, you're just talk.
Lol two kids fighting
OK well the guy a few posts back answered my question. Looks like the Lund tune is basically running the same trap speeds as Whipple... Low 130s. So do I keep Lund and do e85 or go Whipple tune and use flight control. Soo difficult to decide!
Out of your league 1000%.....I haven't questioned any tuners "know how" and asking you one simple question that isn't even about tuning has you upset. That's weak, buddy.Out of my league? K whatever you say.
I'm not the one who runs my mouth about tuning/tuners/and their know-how so you questioning my tuning ability is a nice grab at straws.
You are very consistent at avoiding answering my questions. I'm done replying until you can muster an answer.
The answer is, if there is really 100 hp on the table through the tune, that's a real problem.....I keep going back and forth trying to decide which is the better option for me. I've never tried the Whipple tune... I have only used Lund and the id1000 injectors.
But this new revisions that keep coming from Whipple have caught my attention and I'm curious if anyone has tried both tunes from them?
If you have what are the power differences... Trap speed.. Butt dyno... Or real dyno numbers?
Just from reading the forums it looks like I can switch to the Whipple tune and possibly gain 100 horsepower as well as the flight control to limit power in first and second. Lund thinks I'm around 600-650 rwhp and the Whipple is claiming 765 and 134 mph trap speeds... Which is insanely fast!
Nothing to touch. That guy has a big button on his forehead and I have to press on it.Man.. I'm not touching this one. Lol