Considering all the transmission and engine trouble people are having on the new mustang, not to mention the 15-17(and possibly 18) failing air conditioners, I'd go with the stinger. At least that way I'm getting kia quality from a kia instead of kia quality from ford.
Sure seems like it.
Stinger starts at $32k for the i4 and 38k for the v6. For that you may get a little less power than a mustang, but you get more features and from my test drive, better interior quality. At least comparing to my friend's recently sold BMW 341, the interior was on par or better. 2008 is when kia finally managed to match other manufacturers in quality. At this point its just stigma hanging over their head. hence the creation of the genesis brand from Hyundai. They need a performance brand for the stinger to slot in.
No buyers remorse here, but kind of trolling too I suppose. Whenever I see someone mention another manufacture as being cheap I laugh because that’s the reason I went with the Mustang (because it’s the cheapest V8 you can buy) as well as the unlimited amount of aftermarket parts made for it.
Having came from the import world, I'm not driving any import awd platform that isn't an Evo 9, STI, or GTR. Every thing else is made from glass and even these are pretty much walking a thin line. It's laughable, LAUGHABLE, to imply that the stinger is somehow more resilient in its failure modes than domestic platforms of equivalent or better performance.
Ssh, don't tell anyone. Driving my 15 until the ac dies again or I hit 80k miles.