First PBD tuned GT500

[Myshelby3425]

First PBD tuned GT500

770whp 582trq with race fuel and high flow exhaust. Not sure if that high flow exhaust is cats removed or just the stock exhaust.

Sponsored

 

[Epiphany]

Word is tuners are cooking the cats at "elevated power levels." Be interesting to see if this one had them or not.

 

[BluByeU]

It sounds like they used hi-flow cats, very impressive. These cars are going to hurt a lot of feelings on the street!

 

[Myshelby3425]

It sounds like they used hi-flow cats, very impressive. These cars are going to hurt a lot of feelings on the street!

For sure! But they are going to need radials for the street. More 18” solutions need to come out quick!!

 

[Droopy1592]

8000 rpm?

 

[BluByeU]

8000 rpm?

Exactly...what a F N beast this car is!

 

[olaosunt]

Come on PBD
Lund just pulled ahead with the E85 tune .
Lol

 

[Myshelby3425]

Come on PBD
Lund just pulled ahead with the E85 tune .
Lol

Lund is fucking shit up, lol. I’m sure PBD will too once they take delivery.

 

[V00D00]

Come on PBD
Lund just pulled ahead with the E85 tune .
Lol

Lund has the luxury of being a shop working on a shop car. If i had injectors available, i would have tested them lastnight as well.
Oh, and the exhaust here is stock minus cats.

Hi, thats my car

 

[gmd2003]

I don’t know about spinning it up to over 8000rpm ..... seems pretty risky for minimal gain , vs just changing the pulley .

 

[Darkane]

Gain of 120+whp and 8000rpm?!

I think I’m in love

 

[Idaho2018GTPremium]

I thought your car baselined 684 rwhp SAE? The Insta post says 644 rwhp baseline. You may want to let them know the error, if I'm correct.

 

[V00D00]

I thought your car baselined 684 rwhp SAE? The Insta post says 644 rwhp baseline. You may want to let them know the error, if I'm correct.

no, it was super low. i was quoting 660 baseline to friends, but thats uncorrected, 644 sae. I loaded the 93 catless tune when we were done, so roughly 730rwhp. Cant wait till its dry enough to let er rip

 

[Idaho2018GTPremium]

no, it was super low. i was quoting 660 baseline to friends, but thats uncorrected, 644 sae. I loaded the 93 catless tune when we were done, so roughly 730rwhp. Cant wait till its dry enough to let er rip

Ah ok. I went back and looked at the thread and it was "jwhite" who had 684 rwhp SAE. I wonder why yours was so low? Drivetrain losses on these cars is only around 11%, putting 644 rwhp at only 724 crank hp. Needless to say, 771 rwhp with 11% drivetrain loss is 866 crank hp. Awesome!

 

[V00D00]

Ah ok. I went back and looked at the thread and it was "jwhite" who had 684 rwhp SAE. I wonder why yours was so low? Drivetrain losses on these cars is only around 11%, putting 644 rwhp at only 724 crank hp. Needless to say, 771 rwhp with 11% drivetrain loss is 866 crank hp. Awesome!

Im not quite sure.. maybe there is a 150 mile limitation lol. probably just coincidental we crossed the 150 mile mark on the dyno, s we were adding power

im trying to open the 1st 5 dyno runs, the straight 93 stuff, but the files are not loading in winpep8

Sponsored