Edelbrock E-Force Update

[Roh92cp]

Naw. I made 721 on 92 and a Lund tune.

You made that with the Eforce? If so congrats.

Sponsored

 

[z06psi]

You made that with the Eforce? If so congrats.

Nope. My point is that the eForce is good for the Mustang waxer. Not for the guy who wants to make some power.

 

[Evolvd]

Naw. I made 721 on 92 and a Lund tune.

LOL we were talking about the EForce, not your Procharger

 

[Martman GT]

It's beginning to look like no news is bad news. That's kind of too bad. I really like the look of the Eforce and was hoping it would at least be in the ballpark of say a Roush or VMP from a performance standpoint.

 

[z06psi]

LOL we were talking about the EForce, not your Procharger

I understand that. I was only commenting on the excuse that was given for the low numbers when I was at the same octane and conservative tune.

Edelbrock is not a 800rwhp platform. Proven in every community they get into which is fine. Hence the waxer comment.

 

[69mach1-395]

^Not everybody wants enough power to break their engine...find another thread.

 

[daltron]

^Not everybody wants enough power to break their engine...find another thread.

And all the other proven FI systems break engines lol?

 

[Evolvd]

And all the other proven FI systems break engines lol?

LOL I knew someone was going to bite on that. What I think he means to say is that just because the edelbrock is rated lower doesn't mean that it's inferior. Some folks don't need or want 650+ hp.

 

[Roh92cp]

LOL I knew someone was going to bite on that. What I think he means to say is that just because the edelbrock is rated lower doesn't mean that it's inferior. Some folks don't need or want 650+ hp.

Yeah but, it's not a very good selling point for sure. Most people are looking for a system that has comparable power to the others, not one that is advertised as we cost more and offer less power.

 

[Sawman70]

Nope. My point is that the eForce is good for the Mustang waxer. Not for the guy who wants to make some power.

So 650 horsepower isn't "some power"?

Definately a trolling judgmental comment.

 

[Evolvd]

Yeah but, it's not a very good selling point for sure. Most people are looking for a system that has comparable power to the others, not one that is advertised as we cost more and offer less power.

Maybe...but that's an assumption. A lot of people look for an exhaust that sounds a certain way regardless of performance, or trim/body pieces that add zero functionality. Maybe some folks want a supercharger that looks sweet under the hood and provides great gains at the same time....

Until we have real-world testing on this SC with a good tune no one here can shoot this thing down as "inferior", especially when it comes to personal choice.

 

[Super Werty]

Maybe...but that's an assumption. A lot of people look for an exhaust that sounds a certain way regardless of performance, or trim/body pieces that add zero functionality. Maybe some folks want a supercharger that looks sweet under the hood and provides great gains at the same time....

Until we have real-world testing on this SC with a good tune no one here can shoot this thing down as "inferior", especially when it comes to personal choice.

LOL but we do know it's inferior. It's got a smaller intercooler and it's inverted. Two points Proven to be less efficient already.

The only people who want this kit are people who like the look or are older edelbrock fans. It's a decision based purely on Aesthetics... Not performance.

 

[Roh92cp]

Maybe...but that's an assumption. A lot of people look for an exhaust that sounds a certain way regardless of performance, or trim/body pieces that add zero functionality. Maybe some folks want a supercharger that looks sweet under the hood and provides great gains at the same time....

Until we have real-world testing on this SC with a good tune no one here can shoot this thing down as "inferior", especially when it comes to personal choice.

OK that's a fair statement, not really trying to shoot it down as its a really good looking unit for sure, just doesn't seem to be on par power wise for the money.

LOL but we do know it's inferior. It's got a smaller intercooler and it's inverted. Two points Proven to be less efficient already.

The only people who want this kit are people who like the look or are older edelbrock fans. It's a decision based purely on Aesthetics... Not performance.

Also has a tiny throttle body and on a positive displacement unit that's really important to not be a restriction.

 

[Evolvd]

LOL but we do know it's inferior. It's got a smaller intercooler and it's inverted. Two points Proven to be less efficient already.

The only people who want this kit are people who like the look or are older edelbrock fans. It's a decision based purely on Aesthetics... Not performance.

Inferior for what you want...but alas too many people on here think everyone else should install what "they" want.

I consider the Ecoboost an inferior motor compared to the 5.0...but that doesn't mean people shouldn't buy it.

 

[Roh92cp]

Inferior for what you want...but alas too many people on here think everyone else should install what "they" want.

I consider the Ecoboost an inferior motor compared to the 5.0...but that doesn't mean people shouldn't buy it.

True we all here compare what we have against others it's part of the game and your right shouldn't get mean spirited about it, but it's human nature to advocate for your system.

Not sure the Eco boost analogy is a good one, becuase I don't think people by and Eco boost for the same reasons they buy a power adder. Bang for the buck within reason with compatible option is very important when shopping for a SC system.

Sponsored