UNtamed67
Silver Shadow
Probably for Toronto/Ottawa they are indeed way better than the WR A3 which seems ok for most European countries..THESE seem to be really good ones !
http://www.nokiantyres.com/winter-tyres/nokian-hakkapeliitta-r2/
Sponsored
Probably for Toronto/Ottawa they are indeed way better than the WR A3 which seems ok for most European countries..THESE seem to be really good ones !
http://www.nokiantyres.com/winter-tyres/nokian-hakkapeliitta-r2/
Anything else to weight the rear down? I picked up some Pirelli Sottozero's for dirt cheap from a friend in the same size. They will be going on the prior generation Brembo wheels.I've heard all those comments from naysayers about needing to buy a "winter beater" throughout the years. I can only assume they're just horrible drivers. For the record, I drove my Mustang GT PP all winter. Purchased 19in "winter wheels" and rode on a 255/40/19 square setup which were Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4's. This is my 4th Mustang that I've driven all year 'round, previous ones all GTs and Cobras. I'd say this is by far the best of them with the added aggressive Snow/Wet mode. The way it controls everything, you seriously forget you're even in a Mustang.
Thanks, what I thought tooI have to nokian hak r2s and they are phenominal. Drove it through winter with no issues. No weight is needed the car is already well ballanced and lets not kid ourselves its a heavy car to begin with so it handles snow and ice just fine. Just make sure you get skinnier winter tires than your summer ones and you will be fine.
I haven't put weight in the trunk since my '90 5.0. Not necessary.Yeah, the question about the additionnal weight in the trunk, is that "necessary" ?
I mean of course I can only be a plus, but should we ?
And also, did you get rust proofing for your Mustangs or not ?
I don't think it's a matter of good or bad driver. I can only say with winter tyres the brake distance is considerably shorter. Even on a volvo xc90 with all kind of winter and Dynamic stabilty stuff there is a noticeable difference...And you have to buy new tyres anyway after a number of miles so why not buy 2 sets and use the benefits of each ...Just my thoughts of course.I've heard all those comments from naysayers about needing to buy a "winter beater" throughout the years. I can only assume they're just horrible drivers. For the record, I drove my Mustang GT PP all winter. Purchased 19in "winter wheels" and rode on a 255/40/19 square setup which were Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4's. This is my 4th Mustang that I've driven all year 'round, previous ones all GTs and Cobras. I'd say this is by far the best of them with the added aggressive Snow/Wet mode. The way it controls everything, you seriously forget you're even in a Mustang.
Skinnier is better and prices are way cheaper as well, worth buying a spare set of wheels...Thanks, what I thought too
I'm getting the V6 with the 51A 18" wheels, is 17" the skinniest size you can put on the stang, or would 16 be an option too ? Might not look the best, but being from the Alps, I was taught the skinnier the better on snow...![]()
Hahaha, exactly ! It's like these people who put ugly seat covers to protect their seats, cause it's better for resell value lol They're gonna look at ugly seats with moving fabrics while sitting on, just so the guy who's gonna own the car afterwards can enjoy like new seats... Screw that, I dont even know that guy, and it's gonna save em like what, 100$ on the resell value ?! I wanna enjoy my car andmy seats the whole time I'll be owning itThere's no reason to hide the Mustang in a garage all Winter. After all, who are you saving it for?.....the next owner?
Yeah, very true, but anyway I live in Quebec and it's mandatory here to have wintertires on your car from December 15th to March 15th, so you dont really have a choice; and even if I had, I would go with winter tires, stll ; I mean it's Canada, would be a fool to drive around with "all season" tires IMOAnd you have to buy new tyres anyway after a number of miles so why not buy 2 sets and use the benefits of each ...Just my thoughts of course.
It would be easy enough to tell - they traditionally have had two sets of wear bars molded into the tread. The taller ones indicated the depth of the unique compound, the shorter the limit of legal depth. If you only see one set of wear bars, then I would guess that the dual-compound isn't an issue. But there are two sets, you can bet that it still applies.Another vote for Blizzak LM-32. BTW I don't believe that the "performance" Blizzaks like the LM-32 have the "half the compound" issue...that is only the regular Blizzak winter tires such as WS60 (which are much more effective than the performance series).