Sponsored

Before/After 93 to E85 Lund tuning Dyno.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sasuketr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Threads
61
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
355
Location
Chicago,IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ingot Silver GTPP
Looks like i m sending the datalog to lund as soon as possible. I don't know how in the world but the car put down lower numbers compared to stock with no tune steeda intake. Similar temps snd humidity but stock best run was 396 whp and 368 lbft, lund flex fuel on 93 octane is 389.6 whp and 366 lbft. Ofcourse different days but come on something is not right here!
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
Moddiction

Moddiction

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Threads
82
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
341
Location
Mooresville, NC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Same Dyno? 396 is very inflated for stock. Should be around 370-380whp stock.
 

Sasuketr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Threads
61
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
355
Location
Chicago,IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ingot Silver GTPP
Same Dyno? 396 is very inflated for stock. Should be around 370-380whp stock.
Same dyno and warmer temps before. The stock first 2 pulls were around 382 and 383 whp and last pull was after waiting for 15 minutes 396 whp. Today 2 pulls on 5th gear were 385 whp and 389 whp. Car is running cooler with the 170 degree thermostat and lunds fan settings. So something is way off here. I ll send the log to lund and see what happens!

Has anyone had similar experience like this before?
 

Kuba

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
262
Reaction score
96
Location
Streamwood IL
First Name
Jacob
Vehicle(s)
Ram 2500
Same Dyno? 396 is very inflated for stock. Should be around 370-380whp stock.
I've ran my car on Mustang dyno, stock tune, PMAS no tune, 93 pump gas, hood closed, everything else stock and was 360 whp. Also, was told that in comparison to Dynojet dyno the numbers would be roughly up to 10% higher, so 390ish?
 

newkidnik

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2016
Threads
6
Messages
263
Reaction score
45
Location
Midwest
Vehicle(s)
'16 5.0
Same dyno and warmer temps before. The stock first 2 pulls were around 382 and 383 whp and last pull was after waiting for 15 minutes 396 whp. Today 2 pulls on 5th gear were 385 whp and 389 whp. Car is running cooler with the 170 degree thermostat and lunds fan settings. So something is way off here. I ll send the log to lund and see what happens!

Has anyone had similar experience like this before?
Did you ever end up hearing back from Lund about this?
 

Sponsored

Sasuketr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Threads
61
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
355
Location
Chicago,IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ingot Silver GTPP
Did you ever end up hearing back from Lund about this?
They are working on it! I ve sent two datalogs and waiting for their response. According to some other members here, the flex tune still may require to dial in depending on the car. To get the most benefits you have to do some datalogging going back and forth with lund to get the tune actually dial in.
 

lwnslw

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2016
Threads
13
Messages
447
Reaction score
94
Location
S Fl
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
I have been looking at the Lund FF tune for a while but have some reservations/questions.

So far I have just bolt on's....... Airaid intake, TB spacer, MBRP cat back and a BAMA 93 tune. I had my GT dynoed and it put down 412HP

For those with the FF tune...How does it run when using 93 ? I want to retain the HP numbers I have now on 93 WITH the ability to switch over to E85 when tracking the car for that added gain...

Thanks for all inputs..
 

stoli

Fat Guy Racing
Joined
Sep 18, 2014
Threads
124
Messages
3,225
Reaction score
971
Location
Lakeland, FL
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
'15 Black GT/PP
It's no different than a regular 93 tune.
 
OP
OP
Moddiction

Moddiction

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Threads
82
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
341
Location
Mooresville, NC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Checked with Lund on my tune. Everything looks perfect they said. Car feels great so I didn't think anything was up with it. 416whp/380wtq is right where it should be.
 

Sasuketr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Threads
61
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
355
Location
Chicago,IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ingot Silver GTPP
Checked with Lund on my tune. Everything looks perfect they said. Car feels great so I didn't think anything was up with it. 416whp/380wtq is right where it should be.
Lucky you bud! Mine is still not there yet. It runs better with the stock tune. I even recorded a stock pull datalog. But i am sure there is a way to fix this. I hope i ll post positive results next week.
 

Sponsored

newkidnik

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2016
Threads
6
Messages
263
Reaction score
45
Location
Midwest
Vehicle(s)
'16 5.0
Lucky you bud! Mine is still not there yet. It runs better with the stock tune. I even recorded a stock pull datalog. But i am sure there is a way to fix this. I hope i ll post positive results next week.
:frusty::hitcomputer:

That's a shame. Hope it gets fixed. Sounds like they're really busy.
 

Schung5.0

New Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Threads
0
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Location
Orange County
Vehicle(s)
2015 mustang 5.0PP
2015 mustang gt performance pack

Gt350 manifold, gt350,throttle body and gt350 intake, 47lbs injectors
Flex fuel e85 tune with 91% ethanol in tank
1-3/4 kooks long tube headers with green cats x-pipe, pype bomb axle backs
Rear gear 3.73
6 speed manual

Dyno numbers came out to 430whp/366tq SAE smoothing 5
Doesn't this seem pretty low??
 
OP
OP
Moddiction

Moddiction

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Threads
82
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
341
Location
Mooresville, NC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
All dynos read differently. What was baseline stock?
 

Lonmon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Threads
17
Messages
716
Reaction score
275
Location
Mid East US
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT 10spd Base
Looks like 4th gear pulls instead of 5th gear if thats Dynojet numbers. Even if the HP isn't far off from expected that TQ number is certainly lower then most. I'm assuming a Lund tune but if not the tune is always another suspect.
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 








Top