Sponsored

American Racing Headers and Lund tune

Voodooo

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Threads
107
Messages
5,821
Reaction score
2,399
Location
SE Michigan
First Name
Scott
Vehicle(s)
Carroll Shelbys Soul Lives Under My GT350 Hood
To be fair Lund never had the same modifications, and we have at least one report of Voodoos car running lean on the generic tune before fuel was added to accommodate the ARH tubes.
I never had a single DTC. With or without Lund tune. I kept this silence enough so I'll spill the beans. When I ordered my GT350 tune for long tube and catless through beefcake, he never......
1) told Lund I had a gt350
2) told Lund I had long tubes
3) told Lund I was catless.

When I contacted beefcake while at Watson months ago he was rude and short and insulted the guys at Watson.

When I contacted John not (John Lund) at Lund when I got home that same day, he was helpful and had John Lund Sr call me right away. At first Sr was short and rude also because he thought the guys at Watson were judging him and they weren't. They actually said they know he's good. It wasn't until Sr looked at my order from beefcake that he seen all the mistakes in the order. That is why my car ran like shit on Lunds tune that day at Watson. But I will say this. Since I never even tried E85 and only dynoed on 93, data logging sucks. I strictly run Sunoco 260 GT now. I'm not convinced the flex fuel tunes are that good for this car yet, and as little time as I have to even drive my car now because of my work load E85 isn't right for me.

But yes my car detonated BAD on the first Lund tune (not his fault) with that being said I still pulled 511 rwhp on his tune at 6000 rpm when detonation was noticed. I wish it wasn't a bad tune then because I'm sure on the tune and with 2250 rpm to go I'm sure I would of pulled 520rwhp on 93. Since then I have data logged it on 93 and just recently for 100 octane race fuel.
Sponsored

 

Johnb-5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Threads
10
Messages
155
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City Mo
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
2006 Volvo XC90 GT350
Those codes are related to the front O2 sensors. I believe he does not have cats, so if those codes are coming up, it's most likely either a bad sensor or a bad extension harness which is giving a false malfunction.

Don't run extensions on these cars. There is enough slack in the stock harness to connect directly to the sensor just by releasing the body side of the harness from it's clip on the top of the transmission bell housing.
There is NOT enough slack in the stock harness, use the supplied o2 extensions that came with the Kooks headers or splice wire in to o2 sensor.
 
Last edited:

superman07

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Threads
16
Messages
1,437
Reaction score
549
Location
columbus ohio
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt350
I never had a single DTC. With or without Lund tune. I kept this silence enough so I'll spill the beans. When I ordered my GT350 tune for long tube and catless through beefcake, he never......
1) told Lund I had a gt350
2) told Lund I had long tubes
3) told Lund I was catless.

When I contacted beefcake while at Watson months ago he was rude and short and insulted the guys at Watson.

When I contacted John not (John Lund) at Lund when I got home that same day, he was helpful and had John Lund Sr call me right away. At first Sr was short and rude also because he thought the guys at Watson were judging him and they weren't. They actually said they know he's good. It wasn't until Sr looked at my order from beefcake that he seen all the mistakes in the order. That is why my car ran like shit on Lunds tune that day at Watson. But I will say this. Since I never even tried E85 and only dynoed on 93, data logging sucks. I strictly run Sunoco 260 GT now. I'm not convinced the flex fuel tunes are that good for this car yet, and as little time as I have to even drive my car now because of my work load E85 isn't right for me.

But yes my car detonated BAD on the first Lund tune (not his fault) with that being said I still pulled 511 rwhp on his tune at 6000 rpm when detonation was noticed. I wish it wasn't a bad tune then because I'm sure on the tune and with 2250 rpm to go I'm sure I would of pulled 520rwhp on 93. Since then I have data logged it on 93 and just recently for 100 octane race fuel.
have you been updating the tune with supplied revisions?

How is the butt dyno?
 

Derek@Lethal

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Threads
20
Messages
678
Reaction score
382
Location
Wellington, FL
First Name
Derek
Vehicle(s)
2012 Mustang GT 300A w/ Brembo's
There is NOT enough slack in the stock harness, use the supplied o2 extensions that came with the Kooks headers or splice wire in to o2 sensor.
There has to be, we don't use extensions on our GT350 or on our GT. You have to remove the harness from the retaining clip at the top of the bell housing.
 

Johnb-5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Threads
10
Messages
155
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City Mo
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
2006 Volvo XC90 GT350
There has to be, we don't use extensions on our GT350 or on our GT. You have to remove the harness from the retaining clip at the top of the bell housing.
Done that... its still about 2 inches too short.
 

Sponsored

Voodooo

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Threads
107
Messages
5,821
Reaction score
2,399
Location
SE Michigan
First Name
Scott
Vehicle(s)
Carroll Shelbys Soul Lives Under My GT350 Hood
have you been updating the tune with supplied revisions?

How is the butt dyno?
No updates. I'm pretty close to just ditching Lunds tune period. Since I don't run E85 I'll more then likely have Watson tune it at some point. Data logging and email tunes suck in my opinion.
 

65sohc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Threads
10
Messages
741
Reaction score
227
Location
Fresno, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350

65sohc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Threads
10
Messages
741
Reaction score
227
Location
Fresno, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
There are several nGauge O2 sensor parameters that can be monitored to tell if the sensor is operating normally.
 

Johnb-5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Threads
10
Messages
155
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City Mo
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
2006 Volvo XC90 GT350
Aren't you guys comparing Kooks to ARH? Maybe Kooks are farther away.
I think the base Gt350's have a different wiring harness then the rest.
 

Sponsored

Johnb-5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Threads
10
Messages
155
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City Mo
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
2006 Volvo XC90 GT350
any updates?
After weeks chasing may tail and not getting anywhere I went back to the 93 tune. The car now runs as it should with no issues.
 

jonesd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
199
Reaction score
68
Location
Houston, Texas
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt350
After weeks chasing may tail and not getting anywhere I went back to the 93 tune. The car now runs as it should with no issues.
Do you by chance have an exhaust video of your kooks paired with the magnaflow?
 

Johnb-5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Threads
10
Messages
155
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City Mo
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
2006 Volvo XC90 GT350
Do you by chance have an exhaust video of your kooks paired with the magnaflow?[/QUOTE
NO not right now.....but will say it sounds pretty good.
 

superman07

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Threads
16
Messages
1,437
Reaction score
549
Location
columbus ohio
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt350
that sucks, e85 gives such a low end boost when its running properly. Although mine is still a bit inconsistent. current tank reads 62 percent ethanol and its running strong. I had to fill up with 93 a few days ago, dropped to 20 percentish and felt the lose of torque pretty hard.
 

altjx

GTFO_0036 | 1337 h4x3r
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Threads
88
Messages
3,710
Reaction score
1,527
Location
Atlanta, GA
Website
www.altonj.io
First Name
Alton J.
Vehicle(s)
2017 Race Red GT350
Not meaning to revive an old thread but good lord I'm excited. Just dropped my car off for them to install the entire ARH system + MGW shifter + Lund tune today. Hoping to have it back by tomorrow evening.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
 








Top