Sponsored

American Racing Headers and Lund tune

superman07

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Threads
16
Messages
1,437
Reaction score
549
Location
columbus ohio
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt350
What kind of flex fuel tune issues are you having?
I still believe a lot of the issues are with AFR's and the deductive logic for determining Alc percentage, and the effects of AF ratio change dorking with short and long term fuel trims. Add in the CAI and exhaust changes in his car and Its probably even more volatile.

I have seen to much weird behavior when this car learns the fuel if it isn't driven to a real empty tank. I have had it lock into a percentage in under 2 minutes, there wasn't possibly time for the fuel to disperse, normalize, and run enough through the engine to be optimal. I have not found a way to force a reset to trigger a re-learn.

I have been driving down the interstate, with the car running awesome, just to pull over and need fuel, fill up with e85. Then noticed after the re-learn it felt sluggish.
 

Johnb-5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Threads
10
Messages
155
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City Mo
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
2006 Volvo XC90 GT350
John, do you feel the torque improvements? My car is stock, so there isn't nearly as many variables. Incidentally, my car hated the lund tune and the Lethal off road pipes, killed torque. Car felt like I added 800 pounds. had to take the pipes off, which was fine as it was way to loud for me.

what are some of the most severe issues?

What has Lund been able to do so far? Sending in WOT data logs doesn't seem to really smooth out drive-ability issues. I think Lund sold his car.

Are you going to find a shop and just get a "custom" tune?
The first Lund FF tune, the car ran great, no issues until the check engine light with codes p0430 and p0420. After the tune update, that's was when the hesitation and popping started on hard acceleration. Nothing else on the car was changed no fuel added and ACL remained at 69%. After sending numerous data logs another tune was sent with no improvements. Lund thinks the o2 exstension cables could be bad, I'm not sure on that one. Sometime in next few days I plan to reinstall the first FF tune and see how it runs.
 
Last edited:

65sohc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Threads
10
Messages
741
Reaction score
227
Location
Fresno, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
Have you done before and after dyno pulls with the stock vs Lund tune?
No reason to. It is worth it to me just knowing I'm not handicapped by 91 octane. I have no interest in running race fuel, especially when e85 is convenient, at least as good, and a fraction of the price.
 

Voodooo

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Threads
107
Messages
5,821
Reaction score
2,399
Location
SE Michigan
First Name
Scott
Vehicle(s)
Carroll Shelbys Soul Lives Under My GT350 Hood
No reason to. It is worth it to me just knowing I'm not handicapped by 91 octane. I have no interest in running race fuel, especially when e85 is convenient, at least as good, and a fraction of the price.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but it's not worth the hassle to run E85 for me.
 

Sponsored

65sohc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Threads
10
Messages
741
Reaction score
227
Location
Fresno, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
The first Lund FF tune, the car ran great, no issues until the check engine light with codes p0430 and p0420. After the tune update, that's was when the hesitation and popping started on hard acceleration. Nothing else on the car was changed no fuel added and ACL remained at 69%. After sending numerous data logs another tune was sent with no improvements. Lund thinks the o2 exstension cables could be bad, I'm not sure on that one. Sometime in next few days I plan to reinstall the first FF tune and see how it runs.
I didn't know what those codes were so I looked them up. Malfunctioning cat, or at least cat-related. One way to troubleshoot would be to write you a catless tune with rear O2 sensors off.
 

Johnb-5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Threads
10
Messages
155
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City Mo
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
2006 Volvo XC90 GT350
I didn't know what those codes were so I looked them up. Malfunctioning cat, or at least cat-related. One way to troubleshoot would be to write you a catless tune with rear O2 sensors off.
You are correct, the first Lund 93 tunes I received they were turned off like I requested. Some how that didn't get done when I ordered the FF tunes.
 
Last edited:

65sohc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Threads
10
Messages
741
Reaction score
227
Location
Fresno, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
What are "N/cats"?
 

Johnb-5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Threads
10
Messages
155
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City Mo
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
2006 Volvo XC90 GT350

oregongt350

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Threads
5
Messages
567
Reaction score
395
Location
Oregon
First Name
Michael
Vehicle(s)
2022 GT500 HE, 1967GT Fastback S code,
N/cats

What are "N/cats"?
:D:D:D:D:D:lol::lol::lol::lol::headbang::headbang::headbang:

N/cats are a breed of cats that live on freeways and expressways. They are extremely difficult to catch and have been known to make hi pitched sounds sometimes mixed with load thunderous roars when least expected. Do not approach without using extreme caution and a full checkbook :) :) :)
 

Sponsored

65sohc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Threads
10
Messages
741
Reaction score
227
Location
Fresno, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
I figured that was the case but since your error codes are cat-related I thought maybe I was missing something. All the more reason to suspect that Lund may be right as far as your O2 sensor extension cables. If the tune works on Lund's own car it should work on anyone's.
 

Derek@Lethal

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Threads
20
Messages
678
Reaction score
382
Location
Wellington, FL
First Name
Derek
Vehicle(s)
2012 Mustang GT 300A w/ Brembo's
I didn't know what those codes were so I looked them up. Malfunctioning cat, or at least cat-related. One way to troubleshoot would be to write you a catless tune with rear O2 sensors off.
Those codes are related to the front O2 sensors. I believe he does not have cats, so if those codes are coming up, it's most likely either a bad sensor or a bad extension harness which is giving a false malfunction.

Don't run extensions on these cars. There is enough slack in the stock harness to connect directly to the sensor just by releasing the body side of the harness from it's clip on the top of the transmission bell housing.
 

superman07

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Threads
16
Messages
1,437
Reaction score
549
Location
columbus ohio
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt350
I would be very careful driving this car with the potential of a bad o2 sensor reading, knowing how screwed up it was with E-blends and just a vacuum leak, man, the deductive refueling logic and inference strategy depends on the O2's to get you the right percentages, and ultimately AFR I assume.

Before I had figured out what had happened I put large amounts of 93 in the tank just to see the Alc percentage stay roughly the same. Freaked me out, and ultimately led me to identify my clean side separator was in 2 pieces.
 

superman07

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Threads
16
Messages
1,437
Reaction score
549
Location
columbus ohio
Vehicle(s)
2016 gt350
I figured that was the case but since your error codes are cat-related I thought maybe I was missing something. All the more reason to suspect that Lund may be right as far as your O2 sensor extension cables. If the tune works on Lund's own car it should work on anyone's.
To be fair Lund never had the same modifications, and we have at least one report of Voodoos car running lean on the generic tune before fuel was added to accommodate the ARH tubes.
Sponsored

 
 








Top